Last week in part 1 of this series, we covered whether Twin Vew delivered on its marketing promise. We discussed that one of the major selling points was the land price discrepancy between the site of Twin Vew’s and the price of the nearby plot that would become Whistler Grand.
We also explained why this price gap (in terms of the respective land bids) drew a large crowd of early buyers to Twin Vew, as it suggested the next available option in the area would be much pricier. And it also created speculation that, when Whistler Grand set a new benchmark price, the buyers of Twin Vew would see substantial gains.
But this didn’t come to pass – perhaps due to the unexpected introduction of property cooling measures – Whistler Grand was priced much more conservatively than initially expected. So how did this affect the buyers at Twin Vew? Did any of them still make money? And if there were losses, how bad were they? These are the questions we’ll answer in this next deep dive:
The challenge for many buyers today isn't access to information.
It's interpreting that information in a way that makes sense for their finances, goals, and stage of life.
Over time, that's also why we decided to work with agents who shared the same data-driven and advisory-led approach behind our editorial, consultants who could help readers think through decisions more objectively, rather than simply push transactions.
Today, the team has worked with more than 2,000 clients across over $5B in property transactions.
Who made money on Twin Vew, and who didn’t?
Let’s look at how the prices moved at Twin Vew, from the period right after its Temporary Occupancy Permit (TOP) to 2025 in the resale market:
Average $PSF
| No. of bedrooms | New sale only | Sub sale and resale in 2020/2021 | Resale in 2025 | % change from new sale to 2020/2021 | % change from new sale to 2025 | % change from 2020/2021 to 2025 |
| 1-bedroom | $1,514 | $1,692 | $1,780 | 11.75% | 17.56% | 5.20% |
| 2-bedroom | $1,427 | $1,554 | $1,781 | 8.84% | 24.76% | 14.63% |
| 3-bedroom | $1,368 | $1,554 | $1,921 | 13.60% | 40.50% | 23.67% |
| 4-bedroom | $1,387 | $1,593 | $1,912 | 14.90% | 37.85% | 19.98% |
| 5-bedroom | $1,527 | – | – | – | – | – |
Average price
| No. of bedrooms | New sale only | Sub sale and resale in 2020/2021 | Resale in 2025 | % change from new sale to 2020/2021 | % change from new sale to 2025 | % change from 2020/2021 to 2025 |
| 1-bedroom | $798,788 | $866,233 | $966,629 | 8.44% | 21.01% | 11.59% |
| 2-bedroom | $1,068,347 | $1,179,611 | $1,384,158 | 10.41% | 29.56% | 17.34% |
| 3-bedroom | $1,464,474 | $1,650,300 | $1,979,853 | 12.69% | 35.19% | 19.97% |
| 4-bedroom | $1,919,848 | $2,229,000 | $2,596,481 | 16.10% | 35.24% | 16.49% |
| 5-bedroom | $3,021,333 | – | – | – | – | – |
Average size (sqft) – based on units transacted
| No. of bedrooms | New sale only | Sub sale and resale in 2020/2021 | Resale in 2025 |
| 1-bedroom | 528 | 513 | 541 |
| 2-bedroom | 749 | 759 | 776 |
| 3-bedroom | 1,072 | 1,065 | 1,030 |
| 4-bedroom | 1,386 | 1,398 | 1,358 |
| 5-bedroom | 1,977 | – | – |
No. of units sold
0 Comments