Are New Executive Condos Still For The “Sandwich Class” In Singapore?
Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Is there even a point to the Executive Condominium (EC) scheme anymore?
I know this will ruffle some feathers, but it’s time we gave this some thought. The EC scheme, which dates back to 1995, was designed as a form of sandwich-class housing: a home for those who earned too much to buy a regular flat, but too little to buy private housing. But the recent dynamite performance of Hundred Palms EC, along with the rising cost and quality of new ECs, suggests some rethinking might be in order.
First, it may be time to ponder if like Central area BTO flats before Plus and Prime – ECs have become more of a lottery ticket than genuine sandwich housing.
From interactions on the ground, it’s clear to me that no small number of buyers see ECs as a waiting windfall: assuming you can get one, it’s sure to go up in price in the short span of just five years. Hundred Palms is the most recent example, but check out some of the gains we’re seeing. The fact is, buyers who expect their ECs to be windfalls are seldom disappointed – and this explains why almost every EC sells fast, including Aurelle of Tampines quite recently.
So in principle, we’re already running a bit contrary to the original intent of sandwich housing.
Then there’s the issue of how affordable an EC is these days.
As I’ve mentioned before, buyers who are at or below the $16,000 per month income ceiling for ECs probably have to make a bigger down payment. To quickly repeat: the MSR of the home loan cannot exceed 30 per cent of your monthly income. So at the ceiling of $16,000 per month, the maximum home loan repayment is about $4,800 per month, which caps the loan amount to $910,000.
Assuming a three-bedder at Aurelle is around $1.689 million (indicative), you would need to borrow $1.26 million+ to make the minimum down payment of 25 per cent. So buyers are going to have to cover a shortfall. Raising the income ceiling would fix that, but it would still be a sign that our EC prices are getting on the high side.
If we’re still committed to the idea of ECs as housing first, albeit sandwich housing, we have to be careful that we don’t neglect affordability. Something that’s misleadingly easy to do, because of the temptation to handwave it and say they can “go buy a resale flat” instead.
Let’s not forget the price gap with private condos either
When we checked last year, the price gap between resale ECs and condos is still there (whew!), but as we mentioned, the coming of higher-end ECs may bring a change (I mentioned this regarding Aurelle in the linked article). Barring the largest units like five-bedders, the price gap between an EC and a private condo has generally narrowed in the past three years.
But this could be the start of an unwanted trend: as more expensive new ECs hit the market, and resale gains start climbing, we may soon see the two segments nearing in price (e.g., Hundred Palms’ $3 million+ transaction). As the gap narrows further, the question of ECs’ relevance as “sandwich housing” will come into further question.
To be fair, the high prices do match the better quality we’re seeing – but this further differentiates the EC concept today from yesteryears
I’m not going to point at any specific projects and affect property values here, but since around 2017 (the last land cycle), EC quality has jumped tremendously – a change that may also explain the higher prices.
Earlier batches of ECs were quite different: ask agents or buyers in the past, and most will affirm that ECs used to mean:
More from Stacked
Can Resale Condos Maintain Their Momentum For The Rest Of 2021?
First-time buyers and upgraders were hit by more bad news, for end-June 2021. It was expected that a return to…
- A very inaccessible location, far from the MRT station
- Cramped or closely packed blocks
- Lower quality finishing
- Facilities that are smaller or limited than a fully private condo
This is no longer the case today. Recent launches like Novo Place, Aurelle, etc. have layouts, facilities, and finishing that are on par with fully private counterparts. I’ve actually tried asking people on the ground to spot the EC versus the private condo, from the project details and pictures. Barely a third of the people I ask can tell the difference (and I suspect some of them were just lucky guessers.)
This may lead to a further narrowing of price gaps over time. Some examples of this can already be seen in the Punggol area:
Prive, an EC in Punggol, is fetching average prices of $1,455 psf; and yet River Isles, a fully private condo also in Punggol, currently averages $1,444 psf. There’s an interesting transaction to note here:
In February 2025, a 1,173 sq.ft. unit at River Isles transacted for $1.7 million. But a month earlier Prive EC saw a slightly smaller unit (1,087 sq.ft.) transact for a slightly higher $1.72 million!
The Prive transaction also very nearly beat A Treasure Trove; this is a private condo in Punggol where, in February 2025, a 1,044 sq.ft. unit transacted for $1.733 million; barely higher than Prive, despite the units being almost similar in size.
We can also consider Flo Residence, another private condo in the Punggol area. Units here average $1,356 psf. This is lower than two other ECs in Punggol: The Terrace ($1,409 psf) and Twin Waterfalls ($1,489 psf).
Even if we acknowledge that factors such as floor level, facing, state of maintenance etc. play a role, these are empirical signs that the gap between ECs and condos are closing in Punggol; and other neighbourhoods may follow in time.
Whilst I do think we’ll always have and need a sandwich housing scheme, the nature of that scheme can change
We also tried once with DBSS, for example, although that didn’t last long. But I do expect that, with the way ECs are closing in on fully private counterparts – in terms of both price and quality – we might soon see some alternatives.
Meanwhile in other property news:
- Can you find an almost new three-bedder unit for under $1.5 million? Here are some possible places to check out.
- Is emptying out your CPF to pay your home loan always the best idea? It’s situational, and there are some things to consider first.
- Here’s a homeowner experience we can all relate to: wanting to keep renovation rates sane. Here’s one many of us fail to relate to: people who actually manage to do it.
- Integrated developments: love them or hate them, they’re here to stay on our ever more populated island. Here are some experiences of the people who live in them.
Weekly Sales Roundup (24 March – 30 March)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
| PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
| 32 GILSTEAD | $13,000,000 | 3821 | $3,402 | FH |
| THE CONTINUUM | $5,052,960 | 1690 | $2,990 | FH |
| MEYER BLUE | $4,786,000 | 1528 | $3,131 | FH |
| PINETREE HILL | $4,632,000 | 1733 | $2,673 | 99 yrs (2022) |
| THE ORIE | $3,983,000 | 1453 | $2,741 | 99 yrs (2024) |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
| PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
| LENTOR CENTRAL RESIDENCES | $1,197,000 | 463 | $2,586 | 99 yrs (2023) |
| NOVO PLACE | $1,398,000 | 872 | $1,603 | 99 yrs (2023) |
| LUMINA GRAND | $1,418,000 | 936 | $1,514 | 99 yrs (2022) |
| NORTH GAIA | $1,419,000 | 1033 | $1,373 | 99 yrs (2021) |
| AURELLE OF TAMPINES | $1,434,000 | 840 | $1,708 | 99 years |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
| PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
| LEEDON RESIDENCE | $16,000,000 | 6125 | $2,612 | FH |
| THE CLAYMORE | $11,380,000 | 3348 | $3,399 | FH |
| GOODWOOD RESIDENCE | $7,330,000 | 2454 | $2,987 | FH |
| CUSCADEN RESERVE | $7,299,000 | 2099 | $3,477 | 99 yrs (2018) |
| THE DRAYCOTT | $6,250,000 | 2637 | $2,370 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
| PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
| RIVERBAY | $640,000 | 388 | $1,652 | 999 yrs (1882) |
| KOVAN GRANDEUR | $640,000 | 388 | $1,652 | 99 yrs (2010) |
| 8@WOODLEIGH | $680,000 | 398 | $1,707 | 99 yrs (2008) |
| THE INFLORA | $682,000 | 463 | $1,473 | 99 yrs (2012) |
| SKYSUITES17 | $718,000 | 355 | $2,021 | FH |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
| PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
| THE CLAYMORE | $11,380,000 | 3348 | $3,399 | $6,370,000 | 26 Years |
| THE REGALIA | $5,650,000 | 2648 | $2,134 | $4,270,000 | 21 Years |
| LEEDON RESIDENCE | $16,000,000 | 6125 | $2,612 | $4,000,000 | 8 Years |
| NEWTON 21 | $3,980,000 | 2411 | $1,651 | $2,270,000 | 19 Years |
| TANGLIN PARK | $3,880,000 | 1507 | $2,575 | $2,250,000 | 25 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
| PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
| ORCHARD SCOTTS | $3,900,000 | 2282 | $1,709 | -$430,000 | 12 Years |
| URBAN TREASURES | $1,000,000 | 517 | $1,935 | -$17,000 | 4 Years |
| PINETREE HILL | $3,213,000 | 1292 | $2,487 | $0 | 5 Months |
| THE ARDEN | $2,344,000 | 1410 | $1,662 | $0 | 2 Months |
| PINETREE HILL | $2,056,000 | 797 | $2,581 | $0 | 1 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

For more on the Singapore property market, follow us on Stacked.
Ryan J. Ong
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News
Singapore Property News How Much Smaller Can Singapore Homes Get?
Singapore Property News The Hidden Costs of Smaller Homes in Singapore
Singapore Property News 10 New Upcoming Housing Sites Set for 2026 That Homebuyers Should Keep an Eye On
Singapore Property News Will Relaxing En-Bloc Rules Really Improve the Prospects of Older Condos in Singapore?
Latest Posts
Property Investment Insights What Changed In Singapore’s Property Market In 2025 — And Why It Matters
Landed Home Tours We Toured A Quiet Freehold Landed Area Near Reputable Schools — Where Owners Rarely Sell
Overseas Property Investing The Biggest Mistake Singaporeans Make When Analysing Overseas Property
Pro How Much More Should You Really Pay for a Higher Floor or Sea View Condo?
On The Market 5 Spacious 5-Room HDB Flats Under $600K You Can Still Buy Today
Property Market Commentary 7 Close To TOP New Launch Condos In 2026/27 For Those Looking To Move In Quick
Property Advice I Own A 55-Year-Old HDB Flat, But May Have To Sell — Can I Realistically Buy A Freehold Condo With $700K?
Property Market Commentary Why It’s So Much Harder For Young Singaporeans To Buy A Home Today
New Launch Condo Reviews Coastal Cabana EC Review: A Unique EC With Sea Views Priced From $1.438M
Property Market Commentary Which HDB Towns Sold the Most Flats This Year? The 2025 Rankings Reveal Some Surprises
Landed Home Tours We Toured a Freehold Landed Area Buyers Overlook — It’s Cheaper (and Surprisingly Convenient) From $3.2M
Property Advice We Own A 2-Bedder Condo In Clementi: Should We Decouple To Buy A Resale 3 Bedder Or Sell?
On The Market We Found the Cheapest Yet Biggest 4-Room HDBs You Can Buy From $480K
Pro Why This Freehold Mixed-Use Condo in the East Is Underperforming the Market
Homeowner Stories I Gave My Parents My Condo and Moved Into Their HDB — Here’s Why It Made Sense.