Do Mega-Developments Really Outperform Regular Condos? A Parc Clematis Vs Clavon Case Study

Based on the case study, Parc Clematis, a mega-development, shows similar or slightly better resale performance compared to Clavon, a smaller project. It matched Clavon in $PSF appreciation and resale turnover, indicating that size does not necessarily guarantee higher returns.

The comparison between Parc Clematis and Clavon suggests that larger scale does not significantly impact long-term investment returns or resale gains. Both projects performed similarly in terms of annualized gains and price momentum, with Parc Clematis even commanding a pricing premium.

Buyers value lifestyle features, layout efficiency, and facilities over exclusivity. Parc Clematis's diverse unit mix, extensive facilities, and location near amenities contribute to its strong demand, despite its large size.

Contrary to expectations, Parc Clematis has higher maintenance fees than Clavon, possibly due to its larger and more lavish facilities. Typically, mega-developments are expected to have lower fees due to economies of scale, but this is not always the case.

Parc Clematis sits on over 58,898 sqm of land, offering extensive facilities like multiple pools, clubhouses, sports courts, and unique features such as communal kitchens. Clavon, with about 16,543 sqm, has standard amenities like pools, a gym, and landscaping, but fewer and less varied facilities.