Sellers at property seminars are more accountable than many would suspect.

One of the criticisms I tend to hear about property seminars - both from investors and local realtors - is that there’s a lack of accountability. Caveat emptor applies, and if you get sold a dud at a seminar, the seller gets off scott-free. Or at least, that’s the consequence most people imagine. But this week, we learned that’s not quite the case. 

image4

A doctor in Singapore has successfully sued a property advisor, over a hotel investment in the UK. Said doctor sank around $100,000 into a double-room, for the Tillington Hotel; the expectation was for returns of seven per cent in the first year, to about 14 per cent by the sixth or seventh year; at that point investors might allegedly exit the project and sell their investments for twice the invested sum. 

In June 2021, the hotel was sold at a loss, and the doctor received £3,949 (we’re not sure what exactly it was worth in SGD at the time.) He was able to claim damages in the amount of over $84,989; although the report says he wasn’t challenged.

(Bonus tip for my readers: hospitality-related properties, like hotels, can be among the most high-risk properties. It’s possible for a hotel to run at a loss for, say, nine months out of the year, only being profitable during narrow “travel season” windows; sometimes a hotel may need to make all its profit in those brief periods or go bust. Not always the case of course, but worth checking before you buy.) 

image3

Perhaps it’s time we took all this further though. With ABSD rates at an all-time high, property investors are going to seek alternatives. That’s going to mean overseas properties (everyone is looking at Japan now), as well as non-residential properties (hotels, industrial spaces, malls, etc.) And after seeing so many cooling measures, I know one thing for sure:

Cooling measures make seminars pop up like mushrooms after rain.

It’s frustrating to those with legitimate seminars, because now they get drowned out. Especially because the legit ones tend to be far less dramatic in their claims, and are thus overlooked. Even I would worry about holding seminars now, given the reputation the space might develop.

image2

Nevertheless, it's heartening to see that there is some recourse for those who’ve been in such situations, but let's not solely rely on legal redress to protect our interests. Dive deep, research diligently, and always prioritise understanding over allure. Remember: in the realm of property investment (or any investment, for that matter), if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. 

Meanwhile, it may be time to visit the URA building to see the new draft Master Plan

From the Greater Southern Waterfront, to the redevelopment plans for Turf City, there’s quite a big change that will come up in the near future. 

The first is the increasing number of homes in central areas; and models like Prime housing are letting young couples move into areas that, previously, were unaffordable. Then there’s changes to deal with rising temperatures and the sea level, like the Long Island Project that will completely block my beautiful sea view. 

This is what I get for using so much plastic. Now I get to stare at someone’s undergarments hanging in their service yard or something, instead of my beautiful East Coast Beach with its ships, sun, sand, and oil slick. 

image1

In all seriousness though, knowing what’s going to happen in the URA Master Plan is great to help you in your property journey. While the new possible updates aren’t fully set in stone yet, having a peek at them provides valuable insights into the future direction of Singapore's urban planning. 

As property enthusiasts or potential investors, staying ahead of the curve means understanding the government's long-term vision and planning accordingly. Whether you’re lamenting a lost view or celebrating a potential appreciation in property value, it’s undeniable that change is the only constant. 

In other serious property news…

My apologies for being slow this week, it’s due to Covid-related reasons; but here are some articles for your pleasure nonetheless:

Weekly Sales Roundup (25 September - 01 October)

The challenge for many buyers today isn't access to information.

It's interpreting that information in a way that makes sense for their finances, goals, and stage of life.

Over time, that's also why we decided to work with agents who shared the same data-driven and advisory-led approach behind our editorial, consultants who could help readers think through decisions more objectively, rather than simply push transactions.

Today, the team has worked with more than 2,000 clients across over $5B in property transactions.

See how the consultation works →

Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFTENURE
MIDTOWN MODERN$5,617,0001808$3,10699 yrs (2019)
TERRA HILL$5,341,0001894$2,819FH
THE CONTINUUM$4,861,0001690$2,876FH
PULLMAN RESIDENCES NEWTON$4,425,3001281$3,455FH
THE RESERVE RESIDENCES$3,760,7781625$2,31499 yrs (2021)

Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFTENURE
THE LAKEGARDEN RESIDENCES$1,249,900592$2,11199 yrs (2023)
NORTH GAIA$1,301,0001033$1,25999 yrs (2021)
THE ARDEN$1,330,000721$1,84499 yrs (1969)
FORETT AT BUKIT TIMAH$1,355,000570$2,375FH
PROVENCE RESIDENCE$1,379,000926$1,49099 yrs (2020)

Top 5 Most Expensive Resale

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFTENURE
GOODWOOD RESIDENCE$32,000,00010710$2,988FH
BOTANIKA$5,200,0002497$2,082FH
THE WATERSIDE$4,230,0002400$1,762FH
SEASIDE RESIDENCES$4,060,0001679$2,41899 yrs (2016)
N.A.$3,780,0001798$2,103FH

Top 5 Cheapest Resale

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFTENURE
N.A.$440,0001539$28699 yrs (1953)
THE GARDEN RESIDENCES$780,000474$1,64799 yrs (2017)
GRANDEUR PARK RESIDENCES$784,000420$1,86899 yrs (2016)
SKY GREEN$788,888441$1,788FH
EUHABITAT$790,000560$1,41199 yrs (2010)

Top 5 Biggest Winners

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFRETURNSHOLDING PERIOD
GOODWOOD RESIDENCE$32,000,00010710$2,988$16,400,0009 Years
BOTANIKA$5,200,0002497$2,082$2,618,00016 Years
AMARYLLIS VILLE$3,753,0001991$1,885$1,803,00014 Years
THE SPRINGBLOOM$2,400,0001647$1,457$1,680,86825 Years
DOVER PARKVIEW$2,668,0002228$1,197$1,488,00017 Years

Top 5 Biggest Losers

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFRETURNSHOLDING PERIOD
MARINA BAY SUITES$3,150,0001615$1,951-$655,00013 Years
THE LAURELS$3,600,0001313$2,741-$538,00013 Years
THE COAST AT SENTOSA COVE$3,650,0002562$1,425-$395,00016 Years
EON SHENTON$1,358,888689$1,973-$294,31211 Years
KINGSFORD WATERBAY$1,070,000850$1,258-$99,0005 Years

Transaction Breakdown

Type Of Sale Proportion NEWSLETTER

My interesting links of the week:

- An interview of Donald Trump in 1980

image5

You can watch the interview here for yourself, but I was stunned to see how his famous hair was almost the same even when he was 33 (although I’m not sure what I was expecting here). 

It was also curious to me to see him branded as a real estate investor, as with all his recent shenanigans and stint as the president of the US, many have probably forgotten that he used to be in real estate. 

You gotta admit, even back then, you can tell that he’s just… different.

For more news on the Singapore property market, follow us on Stacked.

At Stacked, we like to look beyond the headlines and surface-level numbers, and focus on how things play out in the real world.

If you'd like to discuss how this applies to your own circumstances, you can reach out for a one-to-one consultation here.

And if you simply have a question or want to share a thought, feel free to write to us at stories@stackedhomes.com. We read every message.