Is This New ABSD Rule A Sign?


A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Changes to ABSD for developers are a sign of the times.

When we started seeing runaway prices after Covid, there was a sense of “not this again,” and most market watchers had flashbacks to 2009 to 2013, or the 2017 en-bloc fever. The last two times property prices skyrocketed, some of the more common scapegoats were:
- Developers being too exuberant, and
- Foreigners pushing up prices
So we saw the slew of responses, from new cooling measures to higher Land Betterment Charges (LBC). But as the post-covid phase came to a close, there was a sense that analysts and regulators were missing something.
Foreigners had been hit with the highest ABSD rate ever, with taxes doubling to 60 per cent; and we saw prices dip in the most affected areas. But still, property prices remained high.

Then the expected “second round” of en-bloc fever never materialised; and far from being exuberant, developers have been at their most muted and timid in decades. The government likely sat up and took notice when the bid for a Marina Bay white site – with what would have been a hot commodity previously – drew one lonely bid; and that bid was so low, URA rejected it and didn’t sell.
Clearly, things are different now; and the high prices aren’t easily blamed on foreigners (even the money-laundering ones), or on developers getting cocky. In fact, some realtors have commented about how few Singaporeans are willing to sell (at today’s prices, what can they buy even if they sell an $800,000 4-room flat? A two-bedder where a second toilet is a priced-out luxury? Forget it.
The changes to ABSD clawback may be a sign that things are changing
It’s not a huge change, but it is the very first time we’ve seen the government budge on it.
Under the old rules, developers had five years to complete and sell every single unit; failing to do so meant they forfeited the ABSD, which is 40 per cent of the land price. Developers could get ABSD remission of up to 35 per cent, if they completed and sold out in five years.
The government didn’t really care how many units were involved: a 1,000 unit development had the same time limit as a 50 unit development.

Now, after Budget 2024 and the Marina site bid, we have a concession: If a developer can complete the project in five years, and sell out at least 90 per cent of the units, they can get partial ABSD remission. The amount of the remission will vary based on the number of units they have left over.
More from Stacked
Land ownership in Singapore – here is everything you need to know
It is no secret that Singapore is a very small country. In case you did not know, the total land…
Besides providing a small modicum of relief, this may (just may) have the following effects:
- Developers may be less hesitant to build larger, high-quantum units, which are typically the last ones to move
- Fire sales (i.e., developers rushing to bundle and en-bloc remaining units for sale to meet ABSD deadlines) might be a little less frequent; or may be a little less drastic, depending on the developers’ cost calculations
Depending on how the property market and land bids move, we may see further concessions in the near future. Some of the changes developers have long clamoured for is that ABSD remission be pegged to how many units are left in total, or instead of a strict 5-year timeline – it should be instead scaled accordingly to the number of units that they are undertaking.
Then again, there are those in the market who will cheer the existing ABSD rules; probably out of hopes that, with the boot on developers’ necks, they’ll also be inclined to price new launches cheaper.
Meanwhile in other property news:
- FIVE Lentor projects in just two years, is this maybe getting a bit much for the area? Here’s what the newest one, Lentor Mansion, has to offer so far.
- Above 2,000 sq. ft., but under $3 million. Do good condos at this size and price range exist? We dug some up from resale records.
- It’s February, so check out the BTO launch sites, for those of you who need a flat.
- People are still asking if 2024 is the right time to upgrade to a condo; so here’s an answer, taking into account today’s prices.

Weekly Sales Roundup (12 February – 18 February)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
TERRA HILL | $5,388,430 | 1894 | $2,844 | FH |
KLIMT CAIRNHILL | $5,230,000 | 1496 | $3,496 | FH |
THE RESERVE RESIDENCES | $3,919,463 | 1625 | $2,411 | 99 yrs (2021) |
PINETREE HILL | $3,646,000 | 1464 | $2,491 | 99 yrs (2022) |
GRAND DUNMAN | $3,630,000 | 1432 | $2,536 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
THE LANDMARK | $1,472,640 | 517 | $2,850 | 99 yrs (2020) |
THE MYST | $1,542,000 | 678 | $2,274 | 99 yrs |
GRANGE 1866 | $1,584,000 | 527 | $3,003 | FH |
IRWELL HILL RESIDENCES | $1,647,000 | 624 | $2,638 | 99 yrs (2020) |
PINETREE HILL | $1,927,000 | 797 | $2,419 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ARDMORE PARK | $12,900,000 | 2885 | $4,472 | FH |
CAIRNHILL PLAZA | $5,400,000 | 2852 | $1,893 | FH |
THE SEAFRONT ON MEYER | $4,828,000 | 2088 | $2,312 | FH |
CAPE ROYALE | $4,410,000 | 1905 | $2,315 | 99 yrs (2008) |
CARIBBEAN AT KEPPEL BAY | $3,600,000 | 2099 | $1,715 | 99 yrs (1999) |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
PRESTIGE HEIGHTS | $620,000 | 344 | $1,823 | FH |
CARDIFF RESIDENCE | $668,000 | 398 | $1,607 | 99 yrs (2011) |
HIGH PARK RESIDENCES | $683,500 | 441 | $1,631 | 99 yrs (2014) |
THE PROMENADE@PELIKAT | $685,000 | 484 | $1,486 | FH |
LA FIESTA | $690,000 | 452 | $1,626 | 99 yrs (2012) |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
ARDMORE PARK | $12,900,000 | 2885 | $4,472 | $7,066,041 | 28 Years |
HILLCREST ARCADIA | $2,980,000 | 2325 | $1,282 | $1,830,000 | 28 Years |
PARK EAST | $2,700,000 | 1755 | $1,539 | $1,815,000 | 21 Years |
THE SEA VIEW | $3,500,000 | 1410 | $2,482 | $1,700,000 | 16 Years |
BISHAN PARK CONDOMINIUM | $2,080,000 | 1539 | $1,351 | $1,455,000 | 17 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
THE LINE @ TANJONG RHU | $1,020,000 | 570 | $1,788 | -$300,000 | 10 Year |
THE OCEANFRONT @ SENTOSA COVE | $3,550,000 | 1776 | $1,999 | -$150,000 | 13 Years |
VISIONCREST | $2,860,000 | 1227 | $2,331 | -$110,000 | 17 Years |
SKIES MILTONIA | $1,270,000 | 1076 | $1,180 | -$80,000 | 11 Years |
THE ROCHESTER RESIDENCES | $1,288,000 | 1023 | $1,260 | -$78,268 | 16 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

For more on the Singapore property market, follow us on Stacked.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News

Singapore Property News In a Weak Economy, This Policy Hurts Singaporean Homeowners Most

Singapore Property News Rare Mixed-Use Site At Hougang MRT And New Sembawang EC Plot Just Launched: What You Need To Know

Singapore Property News $1.16M For A 4-Room HDB In Clementi? Why This Integrated Development Commands Premium Prices

Singapore Property News Why Lower Land Prices In Singapore Don’t Mean Cheaper New Condos
Latest Posts

Property Advice The Surprising Reasons Some Singaporean Buyers Are Choosing Smaller Condo Units (Even When They Can Afford More)

Landed Home Tours Touring Onan Road, A Freehold Landed Estate With A “Hidden” Enclave Of Shophouses

Overseas Property Investing I’m A Singaporean House-Hunting In Mexico City: Here’s What 2 Weeks On The Ground Taught Me

Homeowner Stories I’ve Lived In Braddell View For 14 Years: What It’s Like To Live In Singapore’s Largest Residential Site

Property Investment Insights Why Some 30-Year-Old Leasehold Condos Are Still Outperforming New Ones

Pro How Do Old Leasehold Condos Hold Up Against Newer Projects? A Case Study Of Orchid Park

On The Market 5 Cheapest 4 Room HDB Flats In Central Singapore (From $495K)

Homeowner Stories Why These Buyers Chose Older Leasehold Condos—And Have No Regrets

Editor's Pick Arina East Residences Review: First Condo Launch in Tanjong Rhu in 13 Years, Near MRT Station

Pro Do Mega-Developments Really Outperform Regular Condos? A Parc Clematis Vs Clavon Case Study

Pro Affinity at Serangoon vs The Garden Residences: Same Launch Year, Same Location — But Which Gave Better Capital Gains?

Editor's Pick 4 Potential Residential En Bloc Sites That Could Be Worth Watching In 2025

Property Market Commentary Can Singapore’s Housing Market Handle A Rapidly Ageing Population?

Editor's Pick We Tour Freehold Landed Homes Within 1km Of Tao Nan & CHIJ Katong (From $3.88M In 2021)

Editor's Pick Why I Bought A $1.45 Million 2-Bedder At ELTA: A Buyer’s Case Study
