Is This New ABSD Rule A Sign?

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Changes to ABSD for developers are a sign of the times.

When we started seeing runaway prices after Covid, there was a sense of “not this again,” and most market watchers had flashbacks to 2009 to 2013, or the 2017 en-bloc fever. The last two times property prices skyrocketed, some of the more common scapegoats were:
- Developers being too exuberant, and
- Foreigners pushing up prices
So we saw the slew of responses, from new cooling measures to higher Land Betterment Charges (LBC). But as the post-covid phase came to a close, there was a sense that analysts and regulators were missing something.
Foreigners had been hit with the highest ABSD rate ever, with taxes doubling to 60 per cent; and we saw prices dip in the most affected areas. But still, property prices remained high.

Then the expected “second round” of en-bloc fever never materialised; and far from being exuberant, developers have been at their most muted and timid in decades. The government likely sat up and took notice when the bid for a Marina Bay white site – with what would have been a hot commodity previously – drew one lonely bid; and that bid was so low, URA rejected it and didn’t sell.
Clearly, things are different now; and the high prices aren’t easily blamed on foreigners (even the money-laundering ones), or on developers getting cocky. In fact, some realtors have commented about how few Singaporeans are willing to sell (at today’s prices, what can they buy even if they sell an $800,000 4-room flat? A two-bedder where a second toilet is a priced-out luxury? Forget it.
The changes to ABSD clawback may be a sign that things are changing
It’s not a huge change, but it is the very first time we’ve seen the government budge on it.
Under the old rules, developers had five years to complete and sell every single unit; failing to do so meant they forfeited the ABSD, which is 40 per cent of the land price. Developers could get ABSD remission of up to 35 per cent, if they completed and sold out in five years.
The government didn’t really care how many units were involved: a 1,000 unit development had the same time limit as a 50 unit development.

Now, after Budget 2024 and the Marina site bid, we have a concession: If a developer can complete the project in five years, and sell out at least 90 per cent of the units, they can get partial ABSD remission. The amount of the remission will vary based on the number of units they have left over.
More from Stacked
What The Future Of Singapore Real Estate Could Look Like: 6 Exciting Predictions
Let’s imagine for a second that you are in art class and the teacher gave you this description to create:
Besides providing a small modicum of relief, this may (just may) have the following effects:
- Developers may be less hesitant to build larger, high-quantum units, which are typically the last ones to move
- Fire sales (i.e., developers rushing to bundle and en-bloc remaining units for sale to meet ABSD deadlines) might be a little less frequent; or may be a little less drastic, depending on the developers’ cost calculations
Depending on how the property market and land bids move, we may see further concessions in the near future. Some of the changes developers have long clamoured for is that ABSD remission be pegged to how many units are left in total, or instead of a strict 5-year timeline – it should be instead scaled accordingly to the number of units that they are undertaking.
Then again, there are those in the market who will cheer the existing ABSD rules; probably out of hopes that, with the boot on developers’ necks, they’ll also be inclined to price new launches cheaper.
Meanwhile in other property news:
- FIVE Lentor projects in just two years, is this maybe getting a bit much for the area? Here’s what the newest one, Lentor Mansion, has to offer so far.
- Above 2,000 sq. ft., but under $3 million. Do good condos at this size and price range exist? We dug some up from resale records.
- It’s February, so check out the BTO launch sites, for those of you who need a flat.
- People are still asking if 2024 is the right time to upgrade to a condo; so here’s an answer, taking into account today’s prices.

Weekly Sales Roundup (12 February – 18 February)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
TERRA HILL | $5,388,430 | 1894 | $2,844 | FH |
KLIMT CAIRNHILL | $5,230,000 | 1496 | $3,496 | FH |
THE RESERVE RESIDENCES | $3,919,463 | 1625 | $2,411 | 99 yrs (2021) |
PINETREE HILL | $3,646,000 | 1464 | $2,491 | 99 yrs (2022) |
GRAND DUNMAN | $3,630,000 | 1432 | $2,536 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
THE LANDMARK | $1,472,640 | 517 | $2,850 | 99 yrs (2020) |
THE MYST | $1,542,000 | 678 | $2,274 | 99 yrs |
GRANGE 1866 | $1,584,000 | 527 | $3,003 | FH |
IRWELL HILL RESIDENCES | $1,647,000 | 624 | $2,638 | 99 yrs (2020) |
PINETREE HILL | $1,927,000 | 797 | $2,419 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ARDMORE PARK | $12,900,000 | 2885 | $4,472 | FH |
CAIRNHILL PLAZA | $5,400,000 | 2852 | $1,893 | FH |
THE SEAFRONT ON MEYER | $4,828,000 | 2088 | $2,312 | FH |
CAPE ROYALE | $4,410,000 | 1905 | $2,315 | 99 yrs (2008) |
CARIBBEAN AT KEPPEL BAY | $3,600,000 | 2099 | $1,715 | 99 yrs (1999) |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
PRESTIGE HEIGHTS | $620,000 | 344 | $1,823 | FH |
CARDIFF RESIDENCE | $668,000 | 398 | $1,607 | 99 yrs (2011) |
HIGH PARK RESIDENCES | $683,500 | 441 | $1,631 | 99 yrs (2014) |
THE PROMENADE@PELIKAT | $685,000 | 484 | $1,486 | FH |
LA FIESTA | $690,000 | 452 | $1,626 | 99 yrs (2012) |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
ARDMORE PARK | $12,900,000 | 2885 | $4,472 | $7,066,041 | 28 Years |
HILLCREST ARCADIA | $2,980,000 | 2325 | $1,282 | $1,830,000 | 28 Years |
PARK EAST | $2,700,000 | 1755 | $1,539 | $1,815,000 | 21 Years |
THE SEA VIEW | $3,500,000 | 1410 | $2,482 | $1,700,000 | 16 Years |
BISHAN PARK CONDOMINIUM | $2,080,000 | 1539 | $1,351 | $1,455,000 | 17 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
THE LINE @ TANJONG RHU | $1,020,000 | 570 | $1,788 | -$300,000 | 10 Year |
THE OCEANFRONT @ SENTOSA COVE | $3,550,000 | 1776 | $1,999 | -$150,000 | 13 Years |
VISIONCREST | $2,860,000 | 1227 | $2,331 | -$110,000 | 17 Years |
SKIES MILTONIA | $1,270,000 | 1076 | $1,180 | -$80,000 | 11 Years |
THE ROCHESTER RESIDENCES | $1,288,000 | 1023 | $1,260 | -$78,268 | 16 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

For more on the Singapore property market, follow us on Stacked.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News

Singapore Property News She Lost $590,000 On A Shop Space That Didn’t Exist: The Problem With Floor Plans In Singapore

Singapore Property News 9,800 New Homes Across 11 GLS Sites In 2H 2025: What To Know About Tanjong Rhu, Dover, And Bedok

Singapore Property News Why HDB Needs To Build More 4 Bedroom Flats

Singapore Property News This West-Side GLS Plot Just Got A $608M Bid And 6 Bidders: Why Lakeside Drive Bucked The Trend
Latest Posts

On The Market This Upcoming 710-Unit Executive Condo In Pasir Ris Will Be One To Watch For Families

Landed Home Tours Where To Find Freehold Terrace & Semi-D Landed Homes From $4.85 million In The East

Property Market Commentary Which Central Singapore Condos Still Offer Long-Term Value? Here Are My Picks

On The Market 5 Cheapest Newly MOP 5 Room HDB Flats From $700k

Pro Why Rivergate Outperformed Its District 9 Rivals—Despite Being Nearly 20 Years Old

On The Market Springleaf Vs Faber Walk: Which Future GLS Residential Site Has More Potential?

Property Market Commentary I Reviewed HDB’s 2 And 3-Room Show Flats: Ideal For First-Time Buyers Or Too Small To Live In?

Editor's Pick Why Kingsford Hillview Peak Underperformed—Despite Its MRT Location And “Good” Entry Price

Editor's Pick Buying Property In Malaysia As A Singaporean: 6 Key Restrictions To Be Aware Of

Editor's Pick Why Punggol Northshore Could Be The Next Hotspot In The HDB Resale Market

Homeowner Stories “If We Sell, We’ll Never Have A Home This Big Again”: What Singaporean Parents Do After The Kids Move Out

Property Advice How Much Is Your Home Really Worth? How Property Valuations Work in Singapore

Property Investment Insights Singapore Property Data Is Transparent: But Here’s Why It Can Still Mislead You

Editor's Pick Why Marina Bay Suites May Look Like a Poor Performer—But Its 4-Bedroom Units Tell a Different Story

On The Market 5 Cheapest Convenient 1-Bedders Near Integrated Developments From $800k
