Have DBSS Flats Outperformed Regular HDBs? We Analysed The Data


A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
When the Design, Build, and Sell Scheme (DBSS) was around, there were a lot of negative comments. Complaints about poor finishing, and excessively high prices, meant the scheme was short-lived: we saw only 13 DBSS projects enter the market before the entire scheme was suspended. And yet, DBSS flats today often set new price records, despite their initially rocky reception. This has given rise to the question: have DBSS flats reliably outperformed “regular” flats? We took a look at the results so far:
A quick note on the DBSS flats
For those who aren’t clear about what we’re talking about, please see this article for an explanation of DBSS projects. We’ve also included a list of all 13 DBSS projects there. As a quick summary: DBSS flats were built by private developers but are HDB flats (and will never be privatised). They have unique layouts not common to many HDB flats, such as high ceilings and picture windows, but they do not have condo facilities like pools or private security.
Overall performance between DBSS and regular flats:
Estate | Project | Type | Lease | 3 ROOM | 4 ROOM | 5 ROOM | 3 ROOM | 4 ROOM | 5 ROOM |
ANG MO KIO | Park Central @ AMK | DBSS | 2011 | $926,097 | $1,098,779 | ||||
ANG MO KIO | City View @ Cheng San | Non-DBSS | 2002 | $783,250 | $962,315 | -15.4% | -12.4% | ||
CLEMENTI | Trivelis | DBSS | 2014 | $622,981 | $921,091 | $1,221,667 | |||
CLEMENTI | Clementi Ridges | Non-DBSS | 2017 | $679,445 | $979,945 | $1,196,850 | 9.1% | 6.4% | -2.0% |
HOUGANG | Parkland Residences | DBSS | 2014 | $560,000 | $769,182 | $924,800 | |||
HOUGANG | Hougang Capeview | Non-DBSS | 2016 | $513,500 | $702,668 | $852,678 | -8.3% | -8.6% | -7.8% |
HOUGANG | Hougang ParkEdge | Non-DBSS | 2017 | $493,800 | $643,400 | $788,752 | -11.8% | -16.4% | -14.7% |
HOUGANG | Hougang Parkview | Non-DBSS | 2015 | $632,657 | $834,833 | -17.7% | -9.7% | ||
JURONG WEST | Lake Vista @ Yuan Ching | DBSS | 2014 | $533,250 | $694,985 | $843,343 | |||
JURONG WEST | Corporation Tiara | Non-DBSS | 2015 | $598,000 | $734,500 | -14.0% | -12.9% | ||
JURONG WEST | Yung Ho Spring I | Non-DBSS | 2019 | $446,154 | $614,140 | -16.3% | -11.6% | ||
JURONG WEST | Yung Ho Spring II | Non-DBSS | 2019 | $456,958 | -14.3% | ||||
JURONG WEST | Yung Kuang Court | Non-DBSS | 2018 | $588,918 | $711,761 | -15.3% | -15.6% | ||
KALLANG/WHAMPOA | City View @ Boon Keng | DBSS | 2011 | $1,072,286 | $1,243,583 | ||||
KALLANG/WHAMPOA | Bendemeer Light | Non-DBSS | 2017 | $792,000 | $986,243 | -8.0% | |||
PASIR RIS | Pasir Ris ONE | DBSS | 2015 | $621,875 | $780,535 | $914,563 | |||
PASIR RIS | Costa Ris | Non-DBSS | 2015 | $538,489 | $720,189 | $832,571 | -13.4% | -7.7% | -9.0% |
TAMPINES | Centrale 8 At Tampines | DBSS | 2014 | $624,000 | $814,925 | $950,254 | |||
TAMPINES | Parc Lumiere | DBSS | 2011 | $822,099 | $896,818 | ||||
TAMPINES | The Premiere @ Tampines | DBSS | 2008 | $758,500 | $922,801 | ||||
TAMPINES | Tampines GreenLeaf | Non-DBSS | 2015 | $527,972 | $741,974 | $888,000 | -15.4% | -9.0% | -6.6% |
TOA PAYOH | The Peak @ Toa Payoh | DBSS | 2012 | $765,444 | $1,037,037 | $1,371,097 | |||
TOA PAYOH | Toa Payoh Crest | Non-DBSS | 2018 | $783,574 | $1,083,364 | 2.4% | 4.5% | ||
TOA PAYOH | Lor 2 Toa Payoh | Non-DBSS | 2006 | $905,447 | $1,086,852 | -12.7% | -20.7% | ||
YISHUN | Adora Green | DBSS | 2013 | $542,878 | $737,987 | $871,296 | |||
YISHUN | Floral Spring | Non-DBSS | 2015 | $555,333 | $669,300 | -24.8% | -23.2% | ||
YISHUN | Jade Spring 1 | Non-DBSS | 2012 | $460,000 | $581,761 | -15.3% | -21.2% | ||
YISHUN | Park Grove @ Yishun | Non-DBSS | 2018 | $608,049 | $737,563 | -17.6% | -15.3% | ||
YISHUN | Dew Spring @ Yishun | Non-DBSS | 2013 | $445,500 | $567,773 | -17.9% | -23.1% |
For the above, the green highlights show where regular HDB flats have transacted at a discount compared to DBSS counterparts.
In general, we see that DBSS flats command higher absolute prices than their regular counterparts (obviously). This is evident in comparisons such as City View @ Boon Keng (DBSS) vs. Bendemeer Light (non-DBSS), where City View fetched $84,757 more, despite being six years older. Over in Toa Payoh, The Peak @ Toa Payoh (DBSS) outperformed Toa Payoh Crest (non-DBSS) by $55,221, again despite being six years older.

In most cases, DBSS costs more for the equivalent flat type. The only exception is when we compare Clementi Ridges (which was controversial as it launched just months after the DBSS with a larger size and lower cost) and Toa Payoh Crest. But we’ll delve further into this below.
Let’s look at comparisons by specific estates:
Ang Mo Kio

Clementi

Hougang

Jurong West

Kallang/Whampoa

Pasir Ris

Tampines

Toa Payoh

Yishun

Note: We ran into some unavoidable issues here. Namely, not all estates had both DBSS and regular flats launched in the same year; so the start and end dates for our comparisons varied. In addition, some projects had too few transactions and would skew our results; so we had to exclude them in the interest of fair comparisons.
When we compare specific estates, it’s less clear-cut which ones performed better. The price appreciation varies significantly across locations. Some non-DBSS flats, such as Costa Ris in Pasir Ris (+39.3%) and Tampines GreenLeaf (+35.4%), outperformed DBSS counterparts in the same estate.
In contrast, DBSS projects like Trivelis in Clementi (+32.6%) and The Premiere @ Tampines (+30.8%) showed stronger growth than nearby non-DBSS flats.
This is also a good time to explain the special cases of Trivelis versus Clementi Ridges, and other instances where DBSS seemed to lose out
By no coincidence, this was one of the flash points in the anger over DBSS pricing. Around a decade ago, there was significant anger among Trivelis buyers, when they discovered that Clementi Ridges – which is right next to Trivelis – was both bigger and cheaper.

We wrote a detailed explanation of this some time ago in 2022, some of which remains relevant. As we pointed out back then, the fact that Trivelis launched at around 16 to 17 per cent higher than Clementi Ridges (despite being smaller) set it as a disadvantage for gains.
In our more updated look however, we can see that Trivelis, despite its early criticisms, still appreciated more in absolute dollar value (+$598,686) than Clementi Ridges (+$517,405). But Clementi Ridges remained competitive, narrowing the price gap and almost catching up with Trivelis. So the DBSS premium still exists, but in this case, it was smaller due to the launch controversy and perceived quality issues.
Meanwhile, Toa Payoh Crest, a non-DBSS project, is famous for having several four-room flats selling for over $1 million. Its gains are quite comparable with its DBSS counterpart, while in Yishun, Adora Green underperformed compared to non-DBSS flats (which saw growth of 33 to 41 per cent.)
In these instances, there’s a likely similarity compared to the Trivelis situation: the regular flats launched at lower prices that allowed greater room for appreciation. It’s also plausible that, going forward, the DBSS premium in these estates will erode; perhaps due to the lack of significant advantages over newer, non-DBSS flats in the area.
While DBSS flats continue to command an impressive quantum, it’s not guaranteed that they’ll outpace regular flats. Their higher initial prices may also translate to slower growth. It will also be interesting to see if, over time, the introduction of Plus and Prime flats has any effect on the DBSS projects.
For more updates as the situation progresses, follow us on Stacked. We’ll also provide you with reviews of new and resale properties alike. If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so here.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Property Trends

Editor's Pick Condo Profits Averaged $270K In 2024 Sub Sales: Could This Grow In 2025?

Property Trends Should You Buy A Freehold Or Leasehold Condo In 2025? Here’s The Surprising Better Performer

Property Trends How Condo Kitchen Preferences Have Changed In 2025

Property Trends Do High-Floor HDB Flats Appreciate More In Value? The Data May Surprise You
Latest Posts

Property Market Commentary Is It Still Safe To Buy A Home In 2025? Why Singapore Property Buyers Shouldn’t Panic

Living In This Beautiful Japanese-Inspired 5-Room HDB Home Features an Indoor Gravel Garden

News Can The CCR Convince Singaporeans To pay $3M For ‘Prime’ Again?

Landed Home Tours A Freehold Landed Estate With A Jumbo Playground In The East: Touring Lucky Gardens (From $3.7m)

Rental Market Is Singapore’s Rental Market Really Softening? We Break Down The 2024 Numbers By Unit Size

Property Picks The Cheapest 2 And 3-Bedder Condos Within 1km Of Top Primary Schools—From Just $1 Million (Part 2)

Units Of The Week 5 Cheapest 5-Room HDB Flats Near An MRT From $609k

Homeowner Stories I Almost Sold My Home In Singapore—Here’s Why I’m Glad I Rented It Out Instead

Property Picks These Are The Cheapest 2 And 3-Bedder Condo Units Within 1km Of Popular Primary Schools (Part 1)

Editor's Pick The Worst Property I Ever Bought (And Why We’re Launching Paid Property Content)

Pro We Analysed 8 Years Of 1-Bedroom Condo Data In Central Singapore: Here’s What Investors Should Know

Pro Where You Can Buy A Resale 3-Bedder For The Price Of A New 2-Bedder In 2025

Pro Why 3-Bedders May Be The Smarter Investment (Over 2-Bedders) In 2025: Here’s The Breakdown

Pro Which Singapore Regions Offer The Best Value For Two-Bedder Condos Today? (Resale vs New Launch)

Property Market Commentary What DIY Property Buyers In Singapore Might Miss Out On (And Why It Matters)

Hi, I think this article needs to be clearer in framing the comparisons. For example, the tables are showing Clementi Ridges doing better than Trivelis, but why is part of the article saying Trivelis did better? Also what is the point of comparison? Is it vs the launch prices, resale prices (which date)?
Even within the same district, location and size matters when it comes to resale. You need to state distance away from mrt and psf price. Otherwise I can only suspect that it’s painting a narrative according to the conclusion wanted in the first place.