How Grand Dunman “Helped” To Sell The Continuum: The Hidden Influence Of Price Anchoring In Real Estate

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Imagine intending to buy a stock, but it’s jumped from $50 to $100 since you started tracking it. Suddenly, $50 becomes your anchor point, making $100 seem costly.
But is $100 truly expensive? It’s hard to tell.
If the company’s revenue and earnings have significantly increased (or there’s a much bigger potential upside now), $100 now might actually present a better deal than $50 from a year ago. But the issue is, that we don’t concentrate on the value of the company’s business, we compare the current price to previous prices.
As such, all of us tend to be affected by price anchoring, whether it’s at the high end or the low.
Likewise in the property market, we like to think that most buyers are rational, and evaluate properties based on location, facilities, convenience, etc. But there’s no getting around some deep-rooted psychological quirks, that prevent us from making totally balanced price comparisons. One of the issues we often come across is price anchoring, and even developers and sales teams need to contend with this. Here’s how it works:
What is price anchoring?
There’s a human tendency to seek out a baseline, when it comes to comparing costs. Before we buy something, we want to know the usual price for a similar item, so we can decide if what we’re looking at is expensive. That’s generally a smart thing to do. The problem is, we’re not very good at it.
Most people don’t do a lot of active research in finding that “baseline,” and can be misled into thinking something is cheaper (or pricier, in the case of bad marketing) than it really is. Let’s apply this to condo prices for example:
The priciest penthouse on sale – which you’re probably not expected to buy – is at $3,000 psf. But just below that, you’ll see the lowest floor priced at $2,000 psf.
As the contrast between $2,000 and $3,000 is pretty big, you may feel that $2,000 psf now seems reasonable.

The developer is counting on the fact that hopefully, your brain won’t go further than that (e.g., not to the point of comparing it to a $1,000 EC, by which standards $2,000 seems like a very expensive condo).
In the property market, the same effect is used when pricing units; but there are cases – such as when one launch occurs soon after another – where accidental price anchoring happens.
The case of Grand Dunman vs. The Continuum vs. Tembusu Grand
You can see a rundown of these three condos here.

Tembusu Grand moved first, launching in April 2023. The Continuum launched soon after in early May 2023, while Grand Dunman previewed a few months later in July (the actual launch date was around a fortnight later).
The Continuum didn’t see good sales during its launch weekend.
The Continuum moved just 216 of 816 units (26.5 per cent sold) during the launch weekend, averaging $2,732 psf. The most common gripe at the time was pricing; $2,700+ psf seemed high relative to both Tembusu Grand, and the District 15 average.
The developers of Tembusu Grand, perhaps wary of the price gap between the resale condos, had averaged just $2,465 psf (resale counterparts averaged just $1,728 psf).

The green bar shows new launch prices in District 15, while the blue bar shows resale prices. The recent spikes are caused by the three new launches.
So by being the second to launch, The Continuum got stuck with the “expensive” label, thanks to Tembusu Grand anchoring a lower price.
Next comes Grand Dunman
Grand Dunman launched in July, moving 550 of its 1,008 units (54.6 per cent sold) at $2,500 psf. Now more than half is a good number, for a mega-development with a 1,000+ unit count and in the current high interest rate climate.

What’s interesting is that fewer buyers balked at the price, and some even said it was well-priced. Well priced relative to what? Well, The Continuum.
Keep in mind that Grand Dunman is a 99-year leasehold condo. A freehold counterpart in the same location (e.g., The Continuum) would typically be priced about 20 per cent higher (that’s around $3,000 psf).
More from Stacked
Would You Sell Your Home To Retire On A Cruise Ship For $300k In Singapore?
Then you’ll be glad to know you can, in fact, buy a cruise ship cabin and live in it. Now…
So while Grand Dunman is cheaper than The Continuum, it’s not way cheaper as some buyers seem to perceive. It’s just more tolerable due to the initial price anchor set by The Continuum.
Timing was a crucial element here, as being the first, second, third, etc. to launch can all create different impressions of how pricey the project is. Once a launch has set the price anchor, the subsequent launch will be seen as affordable or expensive based on that anchor.
That said, the pendulum has recently swung back toward The Continuum
We’re told that Grand Dunman has now moved the bulk of its lower-quantum units (one and two-bedders), thus leaving just the family-sized or larger units. With most of the units left being higher floors (and price staging), this has allowed a closer price gap between Grand Dunman and The Continuum. This is helping to push sales at The Continuum – since the launch weekend of Grand Dunman, 33 units at The Continuum have been sold, as compared to the 9 units sold in the first half of July.

This may cause a reversal in subsequent months: buyers checking out District 15 may run into the pricier remaining Grand Dunman units first, and then come across The Continuum. If so, this could reverse initial impressions.
In any case, this is a good issue to be aware of, when buying in an area with multiple new launches. You can also watch for it in the resale market (e.g., the first batch of owners in a condo could set the price anchor, when they start selling their units).
These are some other times we’ve seen price anchoring in effect as well
Another case was the Gazania, which launched at around $2,000 psf in May 2019. It moved only 23 out of 165 released units on launch day (15 per cent), and then sold only four units for the rest of 2019.

At the time, $2,000 psf – or a quantum reaching about $1 million for a one-bedder – was widely considered too pricey for a District 19 condo (even if it was freehold). But then in June 2020, and right up to the start of 2023, Gazania started to sell out its remaining units more quickly. This was likely due to $2,000 psf becoming a new launch norm, and Gazania’s price now looking acceptable as a result.

Property Market CommentaryIs $2,000 PSF Going To Be The New Norm For New Launches In 2022 And Beyond?
by Ryan J
We also saw this with Jadescape. It moved 327 units during launch in September 2018; this was at around $1,669 psf. After that, sales were slow and sporadic right up till January 2020. Again, the same complaint of “too expensive” was used, couched in so many polite terms by analysts.
Project | Average of Unit Price ($ PSF) | Sales | Total Units | % Sold by 20th Jan 2020 |
AFFINITY AT SERANGOON | $1,507 | 646 | 1,052 | 61% |
PARC ESTA | $1,696 | 1034 | 1,399 | 74% |
PARK COLONIAL | $1,760 | 706 | 805 | 88% |
RIVERFRONT RESIDENCES | $1,317 | 1204 | 1,472 | 82% |
STIRLING RESIDENCES | $1,796 | 908 | 1,259 | 72% |
THE TRE VER | $1,592 | 649 | 729 | 89% |
JADESCAPE | $1,679 | 608 | 1,206 | 50% |
But after January 2020, other ongoing projects – from Parc Esta to Stirling Residences to Affinity – had sold out the bulk of their low quantum units. They were mostly left with larger units, with price tags proportional to size.
Suddenly, Jadescape (hovering at around $1,690 psf at the time) was regarded as one of the more competitively priced options; and sales started to ramp up.
A check with recent sales also shows that Jadescape has earned its first buyers on average the most out of its quicker-selling new launch competitors at that time. As of this point of writing, the average profit at Jadescape is $317,118, as compared to $146,489 at Affinity, and $279,447 at Stirling Residences.
So it seems how “expensive” a property looks isn’t just tied to its cost for its workmanship, facilities, location, etc. It’s more about the prices that first confront the buyers, and which sets the baseline against which others get measured.
This could make second-mover advantage quite potent for developers, if they’re in time to adjust prices in response to a prior launch.
For more on the Singapore private property market, and its quirks and trends, follow us on Stacked. We’ll also provide you with in-depth reviews of new and resale projects alike.
If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so here.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Property Market Commentary

Property Market Commentary Why More Families Are Choosing Two-Bedders Over Bigger Properties in 2025

Property Market Commentary What The URA Master Plan Reveals About Marina Bay’s Future (And How It Could Impact Property Values)

Property Market Commentary The 5 Most Common Property Questions Everyone Asks In Singapore – But No One Can Answer

Property Market Commentary 6 Upcoming New Condo Launches To Keep On Your Radar For The Rest Of 2025
Latest Posts

Overseas Property Investing Where Should Singaporeans Buy Property In France? A Full Guide For Young Investors

Singapore Property News How A Waterfront Development With 4,000 Homes Is Going To Reshape Singapore’s Property Market

On The Market 5 Rare HDB Flats Above 1,700 Sq Ft You Can Buy Right Now – From $850K

Pro District 15 Resale vs New Launch Condos – Analysing Price Gaps for Larger Family Units

Property Investment Insights Are Singapore’s Suburban Condos Still Affordable? The Surprising Truth

On The Market Rare 16,000 Sq ft Freehold Plot In D15 Hits The Market For $39M

Editor's Pick I Transformed My Two-Bedroom Unit Into A Dual-Key Layout – Here’s Why I Would Not Do It Again

Pro New Launch vs Resale One and Two Bedders in D15: Here’s Where The Price Gaps Are The Biggest

Editor's Pick We Toured An ‘Exclusive’ Freehold Landed Enclave In Singapore That Feels Close To Nature – And Even Has A Canal Running Through It

Singapore Property News Where Condo Prices Rose Fastest (and Slowest) in Singapore’s Outside Central Regions

Editor's Pick I Left Singapore for New York and Ended Up Launching a $450M Manhattan Project. Here’s What I Learned About Buying Property Here

On The Market 5 Cheapest Freehold 3-Bedroom Condo Units In Singapore You Can Buy This Week – Including Quiet Spot in Floraville

Pro Analysing 10 Years of District 12 Boutique Condo Transactions: Insights Into What Drives Profitability

Editor's Pick Rare Detached Freehold Home On Singapore’s ‘Millionaire’s Row’ Up For Sale At $14m

Property Investment Insights Do Primary Schools Really Matter For Property Prices In Singapore? These 6 Condos Suggest Otherwise
