Older HDB Flats Don’t Depreciate As Quickly As You Think. Here’s What The Numbers Show
- Ryan J
- November 20, 2021
- 7 min read
- 7 7 Comments
Common wisdom holds that, because of their 99-year lease, older HDB flats should see a steeper depreciation than newer ones. For many homeowners, it’s a good reason to sell and upgrade early. It was even a big point of online debate in 2018 when Minister Khaw Boon Wan said even 50-year-old flats could appreciate. But how true is all this? We did some digging:
Methodology:
We examined all transaction data from January 2021 to November 2021 (incomplete data for November 2021). Next, we looked at the actual transacted prices of flats across the different ages and plotted them out. Finally, we looked at the price per lease remaining and study how it differs from the theoretical price behaviour.
Do note, however, that this study only compares age and price. It does not factor in location. As a result, there may be “old” properties that are just located in better places, hence the location factor helps sustain prices more than the newer flats. To better address this, all transactions are used instead in hopes that the aggregate data should paint a sufficiently accurate picture.
The commonly accepted theory of leasehold depreciation rates
Bala’s Curve is the most commonly used method of gauging leasehold value. This approach pegs leasehold value to a percentage of its freehold counterpart, with depreciation accelerating toward the end of the lease.
For example, based on the curve, a new leasehold property (99-years) is valued at 96 per cent of equivalent freehold land.
By the time there are 49-years of lease remaining, the value should be around 74.1 per cent of equivalent freehold land. With 30 years remaining, values fall to 60 per cent, and so forth. The discount rate applied in Bala’s Curve is about 3.5 per cent which was chosen as this is the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) medium-term interest rate used in the calculation of the Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR) for property loans.
Note that the depreciation is not linear, forming an inverted U shape on a graph. This is due to the time value of money; the first five years of the lease are thus worth more than the last five years.
While Bala’s Curve can’t be applied literally in every instance, it is the widely accepted model of how a leasehold property depreciates over time.
At this stage, we must point out that the depreciation rate is not so much the focus here – regardless of the rate (unless it’s 0), prices would fall at a steeper rate as the years go by. This is primarily what we’re interested in.
Do we see the same kind of depreciation in HDB flats as they age?
Surprisingly, the answer we derived was no. You would expect that as a property grows older, prices should fall faster over time. As such, if we were to plot out prices of HDBs across the different age categories, we should expect to see a curve similar to Bala’s Curve.
However, older flats do not seem – based on our findings – to be losing more money than newer ones.
To derive this, we compared transaction data from January 2021 to November 2021. We then plotted the transaction prices for flats of different ages to compare the behaviour of prices.
We then checked if it corresponded to Bala’s Curve. This is what we found:
The charts above show a scatterplot of the transactions of different flat types across different ages. You would see that the polynomial trendline follows more or a linear to inverted U curve, meaning the price reduction is the same or slows down as it gets older. This is opposed to the accelerating inverted U of Bala’s Curve.
While prices go down with lease decay, the depreciation is nowhere near as fast as Bala’s Curve suggests. For 5-room flats, in particular, average prices for older flats even seem to defy depreciation and can cost more than newer counterparts. This is especially evident in certain “prestige” neighbourhoods, such as Marine Parade. There are certainly other factors here at play.
Update 21 March 2022: We were asked to consider using $PSF instead of the overall price (as shown above) given that older flats tend to have bigger unit sizes. As such, we plotted the $PSF alongside the age into a scatterplot below:
The outcome still shows the same pattern: a U-shaped curve. In fact, the $PSF vs age scatterplot has a more pronounced effect on older HDBs.
Price per lease remaining
Another way to look at HDB prices is to see what is its price per lease remaining. This is done by taking the price of the flat and dividing it by the remaining years of its lease.
Due to the way prices depreciate (slower at the start, faster later on), the price per lease remaining increases slower in the earlier part of its life than later on. Here’s what it looks like in theory based on a 3.5% depreciation rate:
Over time, the price per lease remaining increases. Consider a flat with a theoretical value of $500,000:
Applying Bala’s Curve, the average price per lease, at six to 10 years old, is about $5,436. At 46 to 50 years old, the average should increase to $8,388, or up around 54 per cent.
However, we noted that the increase (using data from 4-room flats transacted in January – November 2021) went from $5,978 per lease remaining to $8,178 per lease remaining over the same age average. This is an increase of about 37 per cent – less than the 54 per cent as the theoretical model implies.
This suggests that the value retention of HDB flats, as they age, is far greater than the commonly used model. This implies the price per remaining lease may be much higher than the common consensus holds.
So while older HDB flats certainly do depreciate, the rate is much slower than we may have expected.
AnalysisAre Higher Floor Units Better In Terms Of Profitability? We Look At 3,569 Transactions.
by IanWhy could this be happening?
- Our observations are not location-specific
- Housing grants don’t change for older flats
- It could be related to the buyer demographic
1. Our observations are not location-specific
Due to practical limitations, we were not able to derive observations based on specific estates. This gap may explain the reason why some older flats – such as those in Marine Parade – are able to defy depreciation.
A mature estate holds greater appeal, as there are more shops, eateries, and sometimes transportation nodes. Bishan or Queenstown, for example, have more in the way of amenities compared to Sengkang or Punggol.
In addition, some estates are more central than others. Central Area flats, flats in Toa Payoh, etc., see greater demand than most fringe region flats.
For these reasons, a centrally located – or mature – flat could hold significant appeal despite its apparent age.
2. Housing grants don’t change for older flats
Whether a flat is 10 years old or 40 years old, a buyer gets the same $20,000 CPF Housing Grant, and other Enhanced Housing Grant (EHG) amounts that they qualify for.
Because these subsidies are fixed, but older flats tend to be cheaper, the subsidies soak up a greater percentage of the price in older flats. i.e., a $20,000 grant for a new $500,000 flat soaks up four per cent of the price. For an older flat in the same area, depreciated to $400,000, the same $20,000 grant soaks up five per cent of the price.
This can help to maintain demand for older flats, and could contribute to slowing their depreciation.
3. It could be related to the buyer demographic
We can’t ignore that most buyers of these older flats are not younger Singaporeans. They are often seniors and retirees, who are at the last stop of their property journey. This has two implications:
First, the flat they’re buying is meant to last to the end of their life. There is little concern over resale value, as they don’t see these flats being sold within their lifetime.
This means that, if they find a flat they’re comfortable with, they may not mind paying Cash Over Valuation (COV). All that matters is the remaining lease can last out their years; and if they’re in their 70’s, for example, it doesn’t matter if the flat is 40 years old.
Also, for many older Singaporeans, the flat may not factor much into legacy planning. This is because Singapore has a very high homeownership rate of over 90 per cent.
By the time a couple is in their 70s, their children probably have homes of their own, and can’t inherit their flat anyway. This further reduces the need for long remaining leases or resale gains.
These older buyers may also want to pick a mature or central estate for comfort (see point 1), further propping up demand, and slowing depreciation of these flats.
Second, older buyers tend to have more savings accumulated, such as in their CPF. They may also be right-sizing, having just sold off a condo or even a landed property. This makes them better able to afford flats, even those sold well above valuation.
This isn’t to say lease decay is not a real concern
Once again, we’re not claiming it’s a good idea to buy a really old flat, or that you can count on every ageing flat to hold its value. Rather, our point is just that depreciation is not as severe as we may expect it to be.
Those who currently own ageing flats may want to research the valuation, as you may be sitting on more value than you thought. Also, it’s a reminder that sometimes, waiting a few more years to upgrade is not necessarily a terrible idea (especially if you need to build up savings).
For more on HDB resale flats and private properties alike, follow us on Stacked. We’ll also provide you with the most in-depth reviews of new and resale properties alike.
The analysis in article is not complete. There is no free lunch. Slower depreciation in early years, will mean much faster depreciation in later years (after 50 yrs), in general.
Hi Chong, yes that’s right. That’s true, but that point is not so certain yet, as we’re still seeing really old HDBs holding their ground. At some point, the prices would drastically fall, so rather than a smooth depreciation over 99 years, it’s more of a long holding out and a collapse towards the end.
1. not much point if specific locations are not analysed e.g. TPY / AMK / BDK. I doubt we can take 5-10 years SK / PG and compare to these areas
2. Should analyse other periods besides 2021 as well. Don’t think the record COV will continue to stick for old flats. How long did the previous COV mania in 2011 last?
3. there is also some survivorship bias for old flats. Only the better old flats get sold, and the rest are unable be sold. No point selling your old flat now if u can’t get a good deal, because you will be worst off finding a new one.
Hey! Yes these are the weaknesses of the study I’m afraid. There are things that we can’t account for due to a lack of data, as you’ve mentioned, comparing it to places like SK and PG. We’re primarily interested in the relationship on a whole, as we often get questions about whether or not to buy an older flat like one that is 20/25 years old as opposed to a 5-year old flat. There’re a lot of people who would encourage you to “sell quickly” and upgrade before it gets worse, but we just wanted to showcase that this is not so black and white
I feel that Covid period is not a true picture of these old flats’ worth due to exceptional demand for resale flats for various reasons. When worker shortages start to ease and BTOs are available again with normal lead times, it would be interesting to research again the depreciation of old resale flats.
Thanks for your feedback Lin! Granted that the time period in which we analyse the data matters a lot too! This is also true not just for Covid-19, but when cooling measures were implemented, or when developers started to make units smaller in general. A lot of the market conditions are dynamic, and each period is different too. We just wanted to highlight that the depreciation is not as stark if we look at all of the data for the past year
Don’t forget HDBs get new leases of life from HIP I and II and NRP.