Is There Room For Conservation In Land-Hungry Singapore?

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Remember the old saying about poetry being the “luxury we cannot afford?”
It’s from our late, and much venerated, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew. Granted, he said it a long time ago in 1968, back when Singapore seemed to run into a nationwide crisis every other Tuesday. Perhaps there was a change of heart later, once Singapore was developed.
But I can’t help seeing an echo of that in recent land space arguments. We all know that golf and horse races are apparently like poetry: luxuries not everyone can afford. But now, there’s also the issue of Ridout Road’s Black & White Bungalows. And this, like poetry, is supposed a piece of our cultural legacy.
Yet there’s been grumbling about the land size given over to these buildings. With that come debates over whether they’re a benefit to the public or an icon of wealth inequality. This is the question:
Is conservation a luxury we cannot afford when we’re badly in need of land?

Now, I’m going to say that I won’t want a flat there. Ridout Road is as bad as the Turf Club to me.
I mean, have you been to the part of Kranji where the club is? It’s the dictionary definition of ulu. They should keep the horses when they shut the club, those might be the best way to get to the nearest MRT.
Likewise, the Ridout Road bungalows, if converted for public housing, would probably need a lot of work. Landed enclaves and GCB areas are notoriously inconvenient if you don’t drive. (Although obviously, Ridout is in a much better location).
So perhaps a solution lies somewhere in between.
We may not have to tear down the Black & White bungalows and build flats over them. But instead of just renting them out to rich people – which is bound to cause resentment – we could repurpose them while still conserving them.
Those Black & White bungalows can be converted to training hubs, subsidised family retreats, start-up incubators for local companies (don’t worry about it being ulu, I’ve worked for start-ups; we have superhuman tolerance for inconveniences), etc.
And this can be done while keeping the bungalows intact. SLA can still offset some of the maintenance costs, via the tenants they take on.
We could also look into turning more into hotels (like Villa Samadhi), or these could also be really cool spots for other cafes (take a look at this Starbucks cafe at Rochester Park).
It’s easier to justify conservation if we make it accessible to the public. Repurposing the bungalows into public amenities can foster the notion that we share these national icons.
It is, indeed, a matter of optics

A while back, I mentioned one of the problems with SERS sites being replaced by condos: it looks a lot like poorer people being kicked off good land, for their wealthier counterparts.
I’ve always felt it’s a good idea to have Prime Location Housing (PLH) take the place of former SERS sites, for precisely that reason.
The same goes for Ridout Road. Even if everything is by the books, there’s psychological bruising when the average Singaporean sees how our upper-crust live. It’s especially prickly right now, in an environment of high home prices.
This isn’t helped by Singapore being a small country. In larger states, the rural poor might live several days from where their wealthier counterparts reside. In Singapore, people living in rental flats can see $2 million condos across the street. The wealth and income divide are too visible over such short distances.
So for political leaders and celebrities, a home must be sufficient to reflect their status but also understated enough not to prompt envious outrage. I think our outgoing President had the right idea in trying to stay on in her jumbo-sized flat.
More from Stacked
7 Surprising Hidden Residential Plots On The Master Plan You May Not Know About
Even in a country as strict as Singapore, it’s hard to rigidly apply urban planning. Somehow or other, buildings still…
Meanwhile, in other serious property news:
- We checked out some flats that may soon reach $1 million. Perhaps it’s not too late to grab one yet.
- Want a three-bedder, but all the prices are insane? Check out where you can get one for under $2 million; and they’re all 1,700 sq. ft. and above too.
- Or if a three-bedder isn’t doing it for you, check out where you might find a landed property for under $1.95 million.
- Our private home prices have dropped for the first time in 3 years, here’s what you need to know.
- It’s always interesting to see other people’s experiences of living in a brand new mega-development. Here’s what living in Parc Esta, a 1,399-unit development is like.
Weekly Sales Roundup (26 June – 02 July)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
LES MAISONS NASSIM | $32,748,700 | 6179 | $5,300 | FH |
CAIRNHILL 16 | $4,800,000 | 1744 | $2,753 | FH |
THE ATELIER | $4,250,000 | 1496 | $2,841 | FH |
ONE PEARL BANK | $3,880,000 | 1399 | $2,773 | 99 yrs (2019) |
PICCADILLY GRAND | $3,462,000 | 1679 | $2,062 | 99 yrs (2021) |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
NORTH GAIA | $1,231,000 | 958 | $1,285 | 99 yrs (2021) |
TENET | $1,240,000 | 893 | $1,388 | 99 yrs (2021) |
TEMBUSU GRAND | $1,472,000 | 527 | $2,791 | 99 yrs (2022) |
LEEDON GREEN | $1,499,000 | 603 | $2,487 | FH |
PULLMAN RESIDENCES NEWTON | $1,533,000 | 463 | $3,312 | FH |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
TRILIGHT | $4,950,000 | 2099 | $2,358 | FH |
MARINA COLLECTION | $4,522,886 | 2788 | $1,622 | 99 yrs (2007) |
THE VIEW @ MEYER | $3,830,000 | 1690 | $2,266 | FH |
MOUNT FABER LODGE | $3,780,000 | 2594 | $1,457 | FH |
THE DAIRY FARM | $3,550,000 | 2336 | $1,520 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
THE HILLFORD | $546,000 | 398 | $1,371 | 60 yrs (2013) |
THE HILLFORD | $560,000 | 398 | $1,406 | 60 yrs (2013) |
PARC ELEGANCE | $635,000 | 398 | $1,594 | FH |
PARC ROSEWOOD | $646,800 | 506 | $1,278 | 99 yrs (2011) |
CANBERRA RESIDENCES | $710,000 | 614 | $1,157 | 99 yrs (2010) |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
ONE AMBER | $2,920,000 | 1335 | $2,188 | $1,948,900 | 17 Years |
TRILIGHT | $4,950,000 | 2099 | $2,358 | $1,436,000 | 6 Years |
THE VIEW @ MEYER | $3,830,000 | 1690 | $2,266 | $1,379,500 | 15 Years |
FORT GARDENS | $2,560,000 | 1442 | $1,775 | $1,030,000 | 8 Years |
THE SAIL @ MARINA BAY | $1,700,000 | 893 | $1,903 | $937,880 | 18 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
MARINA COLLECTION | $4,522,886 | 2788 | $1,622 | -$2,447,114 | 13 Years |
SCOTTS SQUARE | $2,900,000 | 947 | $3,062 | -$450,000 | 13 Years |
URBAN VISTA | $1,235,000 | 893 | $1,382 | -$120,985 | 10 Years |
REFLECTIONS AT KEPPEL BAY | $2,540,000 | 1496 | $1,698 | -$100,600 | 16 Years |
ESPIRA SUITES | $715,000 | 441 | $1,620 | -$13,500 | 9 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

My interesting links of the week
- A ludicrous luxury apartment marketing video
This isn’t in Singapore (if that isn’t obvious enough), but boy is this one cheesy marketing video for the apartment.
Luxury Apartment website lifestyle marketing is hilarious in its directness:
— Bobby Fijan (@bobbyfijan) July 5, 2023
"Live here, and you'll have sex with ludicrously fit & pretty people"
(Tho the ambiguity is brilliant. Is this a couple? Friends? Threesome? Clearly someone is about to get laid, just not clear who) pic.twitter.com/LBjJ8s1Bop
I’ve seen my fair share of lifestyle marketing videos in Singapore, and while they don’t quite capture the attention like this one, they are all so cookie-cutter that none of them really stand out either.
I would love to see a tasteful example being done. None of that typical going to school, having a picnic by the park type of video, but one that is really able to organically capture the lifestyle of the consumer that they are trying to attract.
- Ann Siang Hill shophouses in the 1970s

I saw this on @ivanpoluninarchives, this was a photo taken at Ann Siang Hill in the 1970s. This was around the same time apartments like Golden Mile Complex and Pandan Valley was built, so you can imagine the era it was in.
I couldn’t quite find data on how much one of these properties was going for in the 1970s, but today a recent 3-storey shophouse in the area was asking for $22 million. It’s a stark reminder of how much Singapore has progressed (and also in terms of the value of its real estate). Very few people back then would have looked at this area in its current condition, and predict just how valuable everything would get.
Follow us on Stacked for more news in the Singapore property market, as well as updates and reviews on new and resale properties across the island.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News

Singapore Property News A 5-Room HDB In Boon Keng Just Sold For A Record $1.5m – Here’s How Much The Owners Could Have Made

Singapore Property News Decoupling Is No Longer a Property Hack: What the Courts and IRAS Have Made Clear

Uncategorized Why More Singaporeans May Soon Trade Condos For Resale HDBs

Singapore Property News This 5-Room HDB in Clementi Just Sold For $1.458M: Here’s What The Seller Could Have Made
Latest Posts

Pro Analysing 10 Years of District 12 Boutique Condo Transactions: Insights Into What Drives Profitability

On The Market Rare Detached Freehold Home On Singapore’s ‘Millionaire’s Row’ Up For Sale At $14m

Property Investment Insights Do Primary Schools Really Matter For Property Prices In Singapore? These 6 Condos Suggest Otherwise

Editor's Pick The 5 Most Common Property Questions Everyone Asks In Singapore – But No One Can Answer

Pro New Launch vs Resale Condos in District 7: Which Bedroom Types Offer Better Value Today?

Property Market Commentary 6 Upcoming New Condo Launches To Keep On Your Radar For The Rest Of 2025

Editor's Pick We Toured A Little Known Landed Enclave Where The Last Sale Fetched Under $3 Million

Editor's Pick The New Condos In Singapore With The Most Efficient Layouts In 2025 Revealed – And What To Look Out For

On The Market The Cheapest 4-Bedroom Condos Under $1.7M You Can Buy Today

Homeowner Stories We Could’ve Sold Our Home for More, But We Didn’t — Here’s Why We Let It Go in Just 24 Hours

Pro Condo vs HDB: The Estates With the Smallest (and Widest) Price Gaps

Property Advice The Hidden Costs of Hiring a “Cheaper” Agent In Singapore

Property Market Commentary I Tested ChatGPT Against Claude on Singapore Condo Floor Plans — And There Was a Clear Winner

Editor's Pick Treasure at Tampines Pricing Review: How Its Prices Compare to D18, OCR, and the Wider Market

Property Investment Insights Which Resale Two-Bedroom Condos Quietly Made Buyers Six-Figure Profits In Singapore?
