Are Old Freehold Condos Still Profitable In Singapore?

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
In theory, freehold condos should continue to appreciate well over the years. One common argument you’ll hear, for example, is that because developers won’t need to top up the lease, freehold projects have better en-bloc value and potential. But there’s growing skepticism these days, as some ponder whether maintaining a condo for 40+ years is truly viable – and with new projects appearing nearby, could a very old condo still appreciate well, even if it’s freehold? We took a look:
Average freehold condo prices based on age:
Year/Age | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | 40 Years Or More | Grand Total |
2014 | $1,609 | $1,249 | $1,212 | $1,194 | $1,003 | $1,510 |
2015 | $1,588 | $1,222 | $1,124 | $1,148 | $1,029 | $1,441 |
2016 | $1,663 | $1,210 | $1,100 | $1,140 | $1,051 | $1,475 |
2017 | $1,705 | $1,235 | $1,167 | $1,180 | $1,172 | $1,505 |
2018 | $1,821 | $1,345 | $1,238 | $1,320 | $1,264 | $1,620 |
2019 | $2,118 | $1,444 | $1,308 | $1,342 | $1,279 | $1,804 |
2020 | $1,963 | $1,423 | $1,290 | $1,359 | $1,169 | $1,695 |
2021 | $2,057 | $1,621 | $1,384 | $1,445 | $1,364 | $1,816 |
2022 | $2,280 | $1,741 | $1,507 | $1,625 | $1,622 | $1,999 |
2023 | $2,459 | $1,846 | $1,617 | $1,671 | $1,567 | $2,117 |
2024 | $2,427 | $1,873 | $1,702 | $1,627 | $1,592 | $2,000 |
Grand Total | $1,944 | $1,492 | $1,346 | $1,375 | $1,381 | $1,730 |
This shows the average price per square foot of a freehold condo, upon each decade it ages. For those who are interested in how it measures up versus leasehold, you can compare it to this article.
Based on the linked article, leasehold condos that are 10 years old or under average $1,410 psf, which is about 31.8 per cent lower than a freehold equivalent.
At 40+ years old, the average leasehold condo is around $997 psf, which is about 32.9 per cent lower than a freehold counterpart. This is a very slim difference, and suggests that leasehold may not fall as drastically as expected versus freehold; not even after 40+ years.

Another interesting point here is that, if you’re willing to settle for a condo that’s 30+ years old, you may be looking at a quantum of $1.6 million to $1.7 million for a 1,000 sq. ft. (roughly three-bedder) unit.
So a freehold, family-sized condo unit may still be within reach for upgraders in 2024, if they can bear with an ageing property located further away.
Let’s look at how much freehold condos appreciate on average, based on age:
More from Stacked
We Analysed 8 Years Of 1-Bedroom Condo Data In Central Singapore: Here’s What Investors Should Know
In this Stacked Pro breakdown:
Year/Age | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | 40 Years Or More |
2014 | |||||
2015 | -1.33% | -2.12% | -7.27% | -3.85% | 2.65% |
2016 | 4.75% | -1.02% | -2.20% | -0.69% | 2.17% |
2017 | 2.50% | 2.13% | 6.14% | 3.53% | 11.47% |
2018 | 6.84% | 8.91% | 6.11% | 11.83% | 7.83% |
2019 | 16.32% | 7.33% | 5.65% | 1.63% | 1.19% |
2020 | -7.35% | -1.47% | -1.37% | 1.29% | -8.61% |
2021 | 4.81% | 13.96% | 7.26% | 6.31% | 16.69% |
2022 | 10.84% | 7.38% | 8.89% | 12.52% | 18.89% |
2023 | 7.84% | 6.05% | 7.27% | 2.82% | -3.39% |
2024 | -1.31% | 1.46% | 5.28% | -2.66% | 1.64% |
Grand Total | 4.39% | 4.26% | 3.58% | 3.27% | 5.05% |
Total Volume | 33277 | 14368 | 7136 | 2195 | 569 |
The condos seem to fare better in the first two decades (perhaps because the condo isn’t considered “very old” yet), or toward the 40+ year mark, when we may be seeing a long holding period show its rewards.
Average percentage gains or losses during transactions
Row Labels | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | More Than 40 Years Old | Grand Total |
2014 | 7.8% | 20.7% | 26.4% | 13.0% | 31.3% | 11.0% |
2015 | 11.9% | 24.6% | 29.1% | 31.7% | 46.0% | 16.4% |
2016 | 14.6% | 31.0% | 31.3% | 35.3% | 21.5% | 20.3% |
2017 | 15.6% | 29.1% | 31.8% | 34.4% | 24.4% | 21.0% |
2018 | 11.7% | 21.1% | 23.8% | 34.7% | 28.9% | 16.0% |
2019 | 13.7% | 26.4% | 33.3% | 33.1% | 24.7% | 19.5% |
2020 | 18.4% | 30.6% | 34.5% | 32.8% | 34.2% | 24.6% |
2021 | 13.7% | 24.0% | 24.4% | 7.5% | 32.1% | 18.9% |
2022 | 8.1% | 33.3% | 12.4% | 6.3% | 15.0% | |
2023 | 1.5% | 4.1% | 2.5% | |||
Grand Total | 12.5% | 25.9% | 29.0% | 31.8% | 26.9% | 17.5% |
The highest percentage gains seem to come from selling between the 30 to 40-year mark, but not after. Similar to leasehold counterparts, profits may weaken past the 40-year mark due to financing issues. Banks tend to lower the maximum loan quantum at that point, which necessitates a higher cash outlay; and this may in turn exert downward pressure on prices.
Looking at performance by District
Profitability
Year/District | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D23 | D26 | D27 | D28 | Grand Total |
2014 | 7% | 8% | 6% | 12% | 7% | 5% | 12% | 11% | 9% | 14% | 7% | 17% | 17% | 5% | 4% | 10% | 8% | 18% | 21% | 1% | 9% | 14% | 11% | ||
2015 | 6% | 31% | 21% | 9% | 13% | 20% | 14% | 12% | 18% | 13% | 18% | 27% | 17% | 9% | 11% | 11% | 26% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 23% | 16% | |||
2016 | 31% | 9% | 21% | 7% | 16% | 16% | 22% | 20% | 18% | 13% | 12% | 23% | 25% | 20% | 15% | 14% | 33% | 29% | 33% | 27% | 24% | 20% | |||
2017 | 31% | 8% | 33% | 11% | 22% | 15% | 17% | 21% | 18% | 20% | 16% | 14% | 24% | 30% | 27% | 17% | 20% | 30% | 31% | 33% | 47% | 35% | 21% | ||
2018 | 5% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 12% | 15% | 15% | 14% | 16% | 14% | 17% | 19% | 23% | 31% | 17% | 17% | 25% | 21% | 11% | 38% | 34% | 16% | |||
2019 | 9% | 21% | 6% | 18% | 22% | 9% | 19% | 21% | 13% | 32% | 17% | 22% | 28% | 21% | 27% | 17% | 26% | 26% | 39% | 32% | 20% | ||||
2020 | 13% | 22% | 25% | 24% | 9% | 27% | 19% | 25% | 25% | 23% | 28% | 24% | 35% | 26% | 15% | 22% | 33% | 41% | 44% | 25% | |||||
2021 | 10% | 33% | -15% | 9% | 8% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 16% | 14% | 27% | 27% | 43% | 15% | 19% | ||||||||||
2022 | 3% | 16% | 37% | 4% | 7% | 15% | 11% | 15% | |||||||||||||||||
2023 | 0% | 2% | -2% | 10% | 3% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total | 23% | 8% | 21% | 9% | 17% | 7% | 12% | 12% | 19% | 16% | 15% | 18% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 20% | 8% | 15% | 14% | 26% | 26% | 26% | 29% | 24% | 18% |
Volume
Year/District | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D23 | D26 | D27 | D28 | Grand Total |
2014 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 58 | 43 | 98 | 109 | 66 | 72 | 5 | 109 | 163 | 18 | 29 | 5 | 74 | 12 | 52 | 28 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 974 | ||
2015 | 4 | 1 | 33 | 27 | 76 | 116 | 60 | 62 | 24 | 71 | 163 | 18 | 26 | 3 | 64 | 22 | 46 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 854 | |||
2016 | 10 | 11 | 23 | 1 | 28 | 76 | 121 | 62 | 45 | 10 | 67 | 151 | 13 | 16 | 49 | 23 | 44 | 28 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 803 | |||
2017 | 2 | 18 | 9 | 4 | 42 | 30 | 100 | 162 | 72 | 85 | 25 | 97 | 199 | 23 | 35 | 63 | 10 | 68 | 36 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 1099 | ||
2018 | 6 | 7 | 38 | 20 | 75 | 95 | 55 | 96 | 10 | 87 | 141 | 15 | 21 | 1 | 55 | 7 | 39 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 803 | |||
2019 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 3 | 28 | 34 | 26 | 27 | 6 | 40 | 89 | 8 | 18 | 23 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 375 | ||||
2020 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 15 | 20 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 21 | 34 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 2 | 27 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 210 | |||||
2021 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 65 | ||||||||||
2022 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
2023 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total | 3 | 56 | 43 | 19 | 222 | 1 | 157 | 474 | 672 | 357 | 410 | 85 | 499 | 965 | 97 | 159 | 9 | 341 | 82 | 291 | 165 | 43 | 21 | 29 | 5200 |
Unfortunately, this isn’t too useful, because freehold properties tend to cluster heavily in some areas but are very rare in others.
In Districts 9 and 10 for example (the Orchard to Bukit Timah areas), it’s more common to find older freehold rather than leasehold properties; conversely, District 25 (Woodlands) doesn’t even appear, as almost everything there is leasehold.
For some of these districts, the transaction volume is so low that the “average” gains don’t mean much, and prices can be volatile. So the gains in Districts like 9 or 10 may provide a more accurate depiction of the area (we’d be careful with District 15, as the area includes many boutique freehold condos that can be quite volatile).
When is the freehold premium worth paying?
In general, the freehold premium (about 15 to 20 per cent higher than a leasehold) only starts to pay for itself much later on. If you’re going to sell within a short period like 10 years, for example, the freehold status doesn’t really mean much; but if you’re selling only in 30+ years, then it may prove its worth without the lease decay.

Due to the long holding period, a concern for homeowners is how well the condo is maintained. This could be an issue in very big developments with lots of facilities – you have to question if the multiple swimming pools, landscaped areas, BBQ pits, etc. will still look good after you hold for so long. Freehold status protects your property from lease decay, but not from declining condo management.
For more on the Singapore private property market, as well as reviews of new and resale condos alike, follow us on Stacked. If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so here.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Property Investment Insights

Property Investment Insights Similar Layout, Same District—But Over $500K Cheaper? We Compare New Launch Vs Resale Condos In District 5

Property Investment Insights New Launch Vs Resale: Which Districts Have The Biggest Price Gaps In 2025?

Property Investment Insights Analysing Forest Woods Condo at Serangoon: Did This 2016 Project Hold Up Over Time?

Property Investment Insights Why Rivergate Outperformed Its District 9 Rivals—Despite Being Nearly 20 Years Old
Latest Posts

New Launch Condo Reviews The First New Condo In Science Park After 40 Years: Is LyndenWoods Worth A Look? (Priced From $2,173 Psf)

Editor's Pick Why The Johor-Singapore Economic Zone Isn’t Just “Iskandar 2.0”

Editor's Pick URA’s 2025 Draft Master Plan: 80,000 New Homes Across 10 Estates — Here’s What To Look Out For

Property Advice We Ranked The Most Important Things To Consider Before Buying A Property In Singapore: This One Came Top

On The Market This Upcoming 710-Unit Executive Condo In Pasir Ris Will Be One To Watch For Families

Editor's Pick Where To Find Freehold Terrace & Semi-D Landed Homes From $4.85 million In The East

Singapore Property News She Lost $590,000 On A Shop Space That Didn’t Exist: The Problem With Floor Plans In Singapore

Editor's Pick Which Central Singapore Condos Still Offer Long-Term Value? Here Are My Picks

On The Market 5 Cheapest Newly MOP 5 Room HDB Flats From $700k

On The Market Springleaf Vs Faber Walk: Which Future GLS Residential Site Has More Potential?

Property Market Commentary I Reviewed HDB’s 2 And 3-Room Show Flats: Ideal For First-Time Buyers Or Too Small To Live In?

Editor's Pick Buying Property In Malaysia As A Singaporean: 6 Key Restrictions To Be Aware Of

Editor's Pick Why Punggol Northshore Could Be The Next Hotspot In The HDB Resale Market

Singapore Property News 9,800 New Homes Across 11 GLS Sites In 2H 2025: What To Know About Tanjong Rhu, Dover, And Bedok

Singapore Property News Why HDB Needs To Build More 4 Bedroom Flats

Maybe an old condo comes with a plot ratio that is lower than maximum allowance,
whereas newer condos would have been built to latest max plot ratio allowed