Are Old Freehold Condos Still Profitable In Singapore?
Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
In theory, freehold condos should continue to appreciate well over the years. One common argument you’ll hear, for example, is that because developers won’t need to top up the lease, freehold projects have better en-bloc value and potential. But there’s growing skepticism these days, as some ponder whether maintaining a condo for 40+ years is truly viable – and with new projects appearing nearby, could a very old condo still appreciate well, even if it’s freehold? We took a look:
Average freehold condo prices based on age:
| Year/Age | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | 40 Years Or More | Grand Total |
| 2014 | $1,609 | $1,249 | $1,212 | $1,194 | $1,003 | $1,510 |
| 2015 | $1,588 | $1,222 | $1,124 | $1,148 | $1,029 | $1,441 |
| 2016 | $1,663 | $1,210 | $1,100 | $1,140 | $1,051 | $1,475 |
| 2017 | $1,705 | $1,235 | $1,167 | $1,180 | $1,172 | $1,505 |
| 2018 | $1,821 | $1,345 | $1,238 | $1,320 | $1,264 | $1,620 |
| 2019 | $2,118 | $1,444 | $1,308 | $1,342 | $1,279 | $1,804 |
| 2020 | $1,963 | $1,423 | $1,290 | $1,359 | $1,169 | $1,695 |
| 2021 | $2,057 | $1,621 | $1,384 | $1,445 | $1,364 | $1,816 |
| 2022 | $2,280 | $1,741 | $1,507 | $1,625 | $1,622 | $1,999 |
| 2023 | $2,459 | $1,846 | $1,617 | $1,671 | $1,567 | $2,117 |
| 2024 | $2,427 | $1,873 | $1,702 | $1,627 | $1,592 | $2,000 |
| Grand Total | $1,944 | $1,492 | $1,346 | $1,375 | $1,381 | $1,730 |
This shows the average price per square foot of a freehold condo, upon each decade it ages. For those who are interested in how it measures up versus leasehold, you can compare it to this article.
Based on the linked article, leasehold condos that are 10 years old or under average $1,410 psf, which is about 31.8 per cent lower than a freehold equivalent.
At 40+ years old, the average leasehold condo is around $997 psf, which is about 32.9 per cent lower than a freehold counterpart. This is a very slim difference, and suggests that leasehold may not fall as drastically as expected versus freehold; not even after 40+ years.

Another interesting point here is that, if you’re willing to settle for a condo that’s 30+ years old, you may be looking at a quantum of $1.6 million to $1.7 million for a 1,000 sq. ft. (roughly three-bedder) unit.
So a freehold, family-sized condo unit may still be within reach for upgraders in 2024, if they can bear with an ageing property located further away.
Let’s look at how much freehold condos appreciate on average, based on age:
More from Stacked
Analysing 10 Years of District 15 Boutique Condo Transactions: Insights Into What Drives Profitability
In Singapore’s property market, boutique condos have always divided opinion. Some buyers are drawn to their exclusivity, low density, and…
| Year/Age | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | 40 Years Or More |
| 2014 | |||||
| 2015 | -1.33% | -2.12% | -7.27% | -3.85% | 2.65% |
| 2016 | 4.75% | -1.02% | -2.20% | -0.69% | 2.17% |
| 2017 | 2.50% | 2.13% | 6.14% | 3.53% | 11.47% |
| 2018 | 6.84% | 8.91% | 6.11% | 11.83% | 7.83% |
| 2019 | 16.32% | 7.33% | 5.65% | 1.63% | 1.19% |
| 2020 | -7.35% | -1.47% | -1.37% | 1.29% | -8.61% |
| 2021 | 4.81% | 13.96% | 7.26% | 6.31% | 16.69% |
| 2022 | 10.84% | 7.38% | 8.89% | 12.52% | 18.89% |
| 2023 | 7.84% | 6.05% | 7.27% | 2.82% | -3.39% |
| 2024 | -1.31% | 1.46% | 5.28% | -2.66% | 1.64% |
| Grand Total | 4.39% | 4.26% | 3.58% | 3.27% | 5.05% |
| Total Volume | 33277 | 14368 | 7136 | 2195 | 569 |
The condos seem to fare better in the first two decades (perhaps because the condo isn’t considered “very old” yet), or toward the 40+ year mark, when we may be seeing a long holding period show its rewards.
Average percentage gains or losses during transactions
| Row Labels | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | More Than 40 Years Old | Grand Total |
| 2014 | 7.8% | 20.7% | 26.4% | 13.0% | 31.3% | 11.0% |
| 2015 | 11.9% | 24.6% | 29.1% | 31.7% | 46.0% | 16.4% |
| 2016 | 14.6% | 31.0% | 31.3% | 35.3% | 21.5% | 20.3% |
| 2017 | 15.6% | 29.1% | 31.8% | 34.4% | 24.4% | 21.0% |
| 2018 | 11.7% | 21.1% | 23.8% | 34.7% | 28.9% | 16.0% |
| 2019 | 13.7% | 26.4% | 33.3% | 33.1% | 24.7% | 19.5% |
| 2020 | 18.4% | 30.6% | 34.5% | 32.8% | 34.2% | 24.6% |
| 2021 | 13.7% | 24.0% | 24.4% | 7.5% | 32.1% | 18.9% |
| 2022 | 8.1% | 33.3% | 12.4% | 6.3% | 15.0% | |
| 2023 | 1.5% | 4.1% | 2.5% | |||
| Grand Total | 12.5% | 25.9% | 29.0% | 31.8% | 26.9% | 17.5% |
The highest percentage gains seem to come from selling between the 30 to 40-year mark, but not after. Similar to leasehold counterparts, profits may weaken past the 40-year mark due to financing issues. Banks tend to lower the maximum loan quantum at that point, which necessitates a higher cash outlay; and this may in turn exert downward pressure on prices.
Looking at performance by District
Profitability
| Year/District | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D23 | D26 | D27 | D28 | Grand Total |
| 2014 | 7% | 8% | 6% | 12% | 7% | 5% | 12% | 11% | 9% | 14% | 7% | 17% | 17% | 5% | 4% | 10% | 8% | 18% | 21% | 1% | 9% | 14% | 11% | ||
| 2015 | 6% | 31% | 21% | 9% | 13% | 20% | 14% | 12% | 18% | 13% | 18% | 27% | 17% | 9% | 11% | 11% | 26% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 23% | 16% | |||
| 2016 | 31% | 9% | 21% | 7% | 16% | 16% | 22% | 20% | 18% | 13% | 12% | 23% | 25% | 20% | 15% | 14% | 33% | 29% | 33% | 27% | 24% | 20% | |||
| 2017 | 31% | 8% | 33% | 11% | 22% | 15% | 17% | 21% | 18% | 20% | 16% | 14% | 24% | 30% | 27% | 17% | 20% | 30% | 31% | 33% | 47% | 35% | 21% | ||
| 2018 | 5% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 12% | 15% | 15% | 14% | 16% | 14% | 17% | 19% | 23% | 31% | 17% | 17% | 25% | 21% | 11% | 38% | 34% | 16% | |||
| 2019 | 9% | 21% | 6% | 18% | 22% | 9% | 19% | 21% | 13% | 32% | 17% | 22% | 28% | 21% | 27% | 17% | 26% | 26% | 39% | 32% | 20% | ||||
| 2020 | 13% | 22% | 25% | 24% | 9% | 27% | 19% | 25% | 25% | 23% | 28% | 24% | 35% | 26% | 15% | 22% | 33% | 41% | 44% | 25% | |||||
| 2021 | 10% | 33% | -15% | 9% | 8% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 16% | 14% | 27% | 27% | 43% | 15% | 19% | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 3% | 16% | 37% | 4% | 7% | 15% | 11% | 15% | |||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 0% | 2% | -2% | 10% | 3% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Grand Total | 23% | 8% | 21% | 9% | 17% | 7% | 12% | 12% | 19% | 16% | 15% | 18% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 20% | 8% | 15% | 14% | 26% | 26% | 26% | 29% | 24% | 18% |
Volume
| Year/District | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D23 | D26 | D27 | D28 | Grand Total |
| 2014 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 58 | 43 | 98 | 109 | 66 | 72 | 5 | 109 | 163 | 18 | 29 | 5 | 74 | 12 | 52 | 28 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 974 | ||
| 2015 | 4 | 1 | 33 | 27 | 76 | 116 | 60 | 62 | 24 | 71 | 163 | 18 | 26 | 3 | 64 | 22 | 46 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 854 | |||
| 2016 | 10 | 11 | 23 | 1 | 28 | 76 | 121 | 62 | 45 | 10 | 67 | 151 | 13 | 16 | 49 | 23 | 44 | 28 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 803 | |||
| 2017 | 2 | 18 | 9 | 4 | 42 | 30 | 100 | 162 | 72 | 85 | 25 | 97 | 199 | 23 | 35 | 63 | 10 | 68 | 36 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 1099 | ||
| 2018 | 6 | 7 | 38 | 20 | 75 | 95 | 55 | 96 | 10 | 87 | 141 | 15 | 21 | 1 | 55 | 7 | 39 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 803 | |||
| 2019 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 3 | 28 | 34 | 26 | 27 | 6 | 40 | 89 | 8 | 18 | 23 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 375 | ||||
| 2020 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 15 | 20 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 21 | 34 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 2 | 27 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 210 | |||||
| 2021 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 65 | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Grand Total | 3 | 56 | 43 | 19 | 222 | 1 | 157 | 474 | 672 | 357 | 410 | 85 | 499 | 965 | 97 | 159 | 9 | 341 | 82 | 291 | 165 | 43 | 21 | 29 | 5200 |
Unfortunately, this isn’t too useful, because freehold properties tend to cluster heavily in some areas but are very rare in others.
In Districts 9 and 10 for example (the Orchard to Bukit Timah areas), it’s more common to find older freehold rather than leasehold properties; conversely, District 25 (Woodlands) doesn’t even appear, as almost everything there is leasehold.
For some of these districts, the transaction volume is so low that the “average” gains don’t mean much, and prices can be volatile. So the gains in Districts like 9 or 10 may provide a more accurate depiction of the area (we’d be careful with District 15, as the area includes many boutique freehold condos that can be quite volatile).
When is the freehold premium worth paying?
In general, the freehold premium (about 15 to 20 per cent higher than a leasehold) only starts to pay for itself much later on. If you’re going to sell within a short period like 10 years, for example, the freehold status doesn’t really mean much; but if you’re selling only in 30+ years, then it may prove its worth without the lease decay.

Due to the long holding period, a concern for homeowners is how well the condo is maintained. This could be an issue in very big developments with lots of facilities – you have to question if the multiple swimming pools, landscaped areas, BBQ pits, etc. will still look good after you hold for so long. Freehold status protects your property from lease decay, but not from declining condo management.
For more on the Singapore private property market, as well as reviews of new and resale condos alike, follow us on Stacked. If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so here.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Property Investment Insights
Property Investment Insights We Compared Old vs New Condos in One of Singapore’s Priciest Family Neighbourhoods: Here’s What We Found For Family-Sized Units
Property Investment Insights Which Condos Made the Biggest Profits in 2025? One Owner Earned $3.8M in Just 5 Years
Property Investment Insights Are Older One- and Two-Bedders in District 21 Holding Up Against the New Launches? We Break It Down
Property Investment Insights Are Older Three- and Four-Bedders in District 10 Holding Up Against the New Launches? We Break It Down
Latest Posts
On The Market We Found 5 Spacious HDB Flats Above 1,300 Sqft You Can Still Buy Under $600K
Property Market Commentary Why Singapore Homes Feel So Unaffordable (Even If Incomes Have Risen)
Editor's Pick Why Older Freehold Condos Are Struggling to Go En-Bloc in 2025
Property Advice Most New Condo Buyers in Singapore Forget to Check This Before Buying (Until It’s Too Late)
Singapore Property News Why This Rare New Queenstown Condo Nearly Sold Out Even At $2,800 Psf
On The Market Surprisingly Affordable 5 bedroom Condos You Can Buy Right Now Under $2.3 Million
Landed Home Tours I Toured A Rare Freehold Landed Street Where $5M Still Gets You A Proper Family Home
Singapore Property News When ‘Fringe’ Homes Cross $2,000 PSF, Has Singapore’s Idea of ‘Prime’ Changed for Good?
On The Market Four Rare Penthouses Overlooking Jurong Lake Gardens On The Market From $4.38m – Each With Over 2,000 Sqft Of Space
Editor's Pick Singapore’s First W Hotel–Branded Condo Launches From $3,230 PSF in Marina Bay: Here’s What You Need To Know
On The Market The Cheapest 4-Room HDB Flats in Central Singapore You Can Still Buy Under $520K
Editor's Pick Zyon Grand Pricing Review: How It Compares To Nearby Resale And New Launches In River Valley
Editor's Pick Zyon Grand Condo Review: Integrated Condo With Direct MRT Access From $2,689 Psf
BTO Reviews October 2025 BTO Launch Review: Ultimate Guide To Choosing The Best Unit
On The Market 5 Rare HDB Flats Above 1,700 Sq ft You Can Buy Right Now In 2025
Maybe an old condo comes with a plot ratio that is lower than maximum allowance,
whereas newer condos would have been built to latest max plot ratio allowed