Sweden Sells Land For Just 13 Singapore Cents… What’s The Catch?

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Fancy a landed property that’s cheap, scenic, and really doesn’t need air-conditioning?
Any of you with classic Singaporean “polar bear” syndrome? By that I mean you make you scream when someone raises the air-con past 22 degrees. There’s now a solution that will keep you cool, and make you a property owner to boot: and that’s to buy real estate at cut-rate prices in Sweden.
According to CNN, Götene, about 320 kilometers southwest of Stockholm, is selling 29 plots of land with prices starting at just 1 krona, or 13 Singapore cents, per square meter (11 square feet). Most plots will come to S$63,500.
Note that this isn’t for a house per se, it’s for the land – and from what we understand, you are obliged to build a house on it within two years. But construction of most houses in the area (the town has a population of just around 5,000) is said to cost just between S$381,000 to S$508,000; comparable with cheaper HDB flats.
Alternatively, if construction seems too much trouble, just look up how cheap some of the existing homes are. Here’s an Instagram account for it – and notice how these landed beauties would probably cost you four or five times the price in Singapore.
As always, there must be a catch, so I cast around a bit and asked on the Internet; and you can also see some past conversations about it on Reddit (the thread’s about three years old, so this isn’t a new phenomenon). The biggest issues mentioned are the harshness of the weather – which may be a bit much even for you polar bears – and the desolation. If we did a review of some of these places, I’d have to tell you the nearest train station involves hiring Bear Grylls and a tundra-dwelling tribe.
Apparently, some of the locations are so frigid, it’s potentially unlivable in the midst of winter; and a substantial amount of maintenance goes into keeping the house standing (pipes freeze, windows chip, and yes, even concrete cracks). The ulu factor is also extreme enough to be a health concern: if you have some kind of medical emergency, it could be three or four hours to town – definitely not the kind of thing for the elderly, but fit young Singaporeans may be up for it.
There’s also the Singaporean tendency to think of housing as investment, which could make all this seem… well, decadent. In all honesty, it’s the most affluent Singaporeans who think in terms of pure home ownership. We’re hardwired to think of property as being part comfort, part investment – otherwise it feels like too much money to waste.
More from Stacked
Japan Vs Singapore: Why Japan’s Zoning Laws Make Sense And What We Can Learn
It’s no surprise that space constraints are a major factor in Singapore. However, Japan – while admittedly bigger – often…
And when it comes to cheap properties in Sweden – as is the case in Italy, Japan, Detroit, etc. – the investment value is likely nil. Barring a slow miracle (i.e., the barren surroundings transform into vibrant cities), you’re not likely to recoup your costs; and the property likely won’t be needed for Airbnb style arrangements, unless someone’s training a corps of winter commandos.
Various issues aside, I think this is an example of where Singapore’s size works to our disadvantage. In many ways, being a small country has advantages in housing: closer proximity to amenities, more neighbours (which adds to security), and a better ability to ensure each neighbourhood sees the right upkeep.
But it also means that, unlike Sweden or Japan or Italy (all places where they’ve had super-cheap housing to draw fresh blood), we have no rural space to run to. When prices get too high, Tengah or Johor is about as far as we can flee – there’s no “fading village” where the price per square foot is lower than your kopi peng.
Who knows: if private home prices keep going at the current rate, more Singaporeans may start looking at more exotic options.
Meanwhile in other property news…
- Affordable resale ECs may be the only way up the property ladder these days. We looked for the most affordable ones by unit sizes here.
- Is 8@BT a good buy? We compare it to its neighbours in Beauty World, to see if it’s a bargain.
- How ready are we for an ageing crisis in Singapore? Here’s a frank look at what can happen when someone elderly goes missing.
- Moving from a landed house to a condo means a lot less space; here’s one family’s experience of the process.
Weekly Sales Roundup (09 September – 15 September)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
CANNINGHILL PIERS | $5,606,000 | 1959 | $2,862 | 99 yrs (2021) |
19 NASSIM | $5,550,000 | 1475 | $3,764 | 99 yrs (2019) |
PINETREE HILL | $3,681,000 | 1464 | $2,515 | 99 yrs (2022) |
THE RESERVE RESIDENCES | $3,472,000 | 1378 | $2,520 | 99 yrs (2021) |
TEMBUSU GRAND | $3,330,000 | 1432 | $2,326 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
KASSIA | $1,161,000 | 549 | $2,115 | FH |
HILLOCK GREEN | $1,292,000 | 517 | $2,501 | 99 yrs (2022) |
TEMBUSU GRAND | $1,437,000 | 527 | $2,725 | 99 yrs (2022) |
LENTORIA | $1,555,000 | 732 | $2,124 | 99 yrs (2022) |
HILLHAVEN | $1,592,897 | 797 | $2,000 | 99 yrs (2023) |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
THE ORCHARD RESIDENCES | $10,250,000 | 2852 | $3,593 | 99 yrs (2006) |
THE LUMOS | $9,039,360 | 3229 | $2,799 | FH |
GALLOP GREEN | $8,580,000 | 3272 | $2,622 | FH |
SCOTTS HIGHPARK | $7,800,000 | 3466 | $2,250 | FH |
LEEDON RESIDENCE | $7,450,000 | 2659 | $2,802 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
PARC ROSEWOOD | $668,000 | 431 | $1,551 | 99 yrs (2011) |
MELOSA | $682,000 | 431 | $1,584 | FH |
PARC ROSEWOOD | $692,000 | 527 | $1,312 | 99 yrs (2011) |
JUPITER 18 | $710,000 | 420 | $1,691 | FH |
EASTWOOD REGENCY | $765,000 | 474 | $1,615 | FH |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
BOTANIC GARDENS VIEW | $4,128,000 | 1755 | $2,353 | $3,265,700 | 26 Years |
GALLOP GREEN | $8,580,000 | 3272 | $2,622 | $2,980,000 | 7 Years |
THE SOVEREIGN | $6,200,000 | 2637 | $2,351 | $2,700,000 | 8 Years |
MAPLE WOODS | $5,000,000 | 3003 | $1,665 | $2,604,800 | 26 Years |
MAPLE WOODS | $3,820,000 | 1787 | $2,138 | $2,470,000 | 18 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
THE ORCHARD RESIDENCES | $10,250,000 | 2852 | $3,593 | -$1,750,000 | 14 Years |
THE SAIL @ MARINA BAY | $4,500,888 | 2077 | $2,167 | -$68,512 | 18 Years |
ECO | $1,300,000 | 850 | $1,529 | -$38,130 | 12 Years |
WHISTLER GRAND | $820,000 | 441 | $1,858 | $24,800 | 4 Years |
VIBES @ KOVAN | $1,000,000 | 786 | $1,273 | $30,000 | 2 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

For more stories about home ownership experiences and real estate, follow us on Stacked.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News

Singapore Property News Is Your HDB or Condo at Risk of a Sinkhole? 5 Signs to Watch Out For

Singapore Property News This 3-Room Flat in Toa Payoh Just Sold for $920K — Here’s What The Seller Could Have Made

Singapore Property News Would You Still Pay More For A Private Condo, If The EC Next Door Looked The Same?

Singapore Property News Why July 2025 Could Be the Best Time Yet for Singles and Second-Timers to Apply for a BTO
Latest Posts

New Launch Condo Analysis Springleaf Residence Launches From $878K — Is This 941-Unit Mega Development Worth It?

On The Market 5 Spacious 3-Bedroom Condos That Cost Less Than You’d Expect (Under $2M)

New Launch Condo Analysis Canberra Crescent Residences Pricing Breakdown: A Price Comparison With Nearby Condos

Property Market Commentary 10 Most Affordable New Launch Condos Under $1.5 Million—Some Are Surprisingly Central

Editor's Pick Why I Might Still Pay $1 Million For A 50-Year-Old HDB—Even If Everyone Says It’s A Bad Buy

Editor's Pick A New River Valley Condo From Just $1.2M? Here’s What You Need To Know About River Green’s Pricing

Property Market Commentary Singapore’s Most Expensive Neighbourhoods Are Changing—4 Buyer Trends That Prove It In 2025

Property Market Commentary URA 2025 Draft Master Plan: 6 Under The Radar Changes You May Have Missed

Editor's Pick We Found Freehold Landed Homes From $4 Million In The East—But Would You Live Here?

Overseas Property Investing Why I Bought 7 Properties in Johor Bahru, and Will Still Buy More

Editor's Pick River Green Condo Review: Attractive Entry Price To River Valley From $1.2m

On The Market 5 Spacious Cluster Landed Homes That Cost Less Than You’d Expect (From $2.79M)

Pro Why The Interlace Condo Underperformed—Despite Its Massive Land Size And Large Units

On The Market Spacious 4-Bedroom In Orchard Is On The Market For $6.3M – With a Rare Standout Feature

BTO Reviews July 2025 BTO Launch Review: Ultimate Guide To Choosing The Best Unit
