Are Larger Condo Units A Better Investment? Comparing Profits Of One, Two, and Three Bedroom Units

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Some property buyers swear by family-sized units (i.e., three-bedders or bigger), whereas others believe in low quantum one and two-bedders. But as far as returns go, which of these unit sizes is actually better for investment? It’s worth a look since the property market has changed a lot, from the shoebox craze in the 2010s to the growing preference for larger homes in the past decade:
A broad overview of performance
For this study, we compared 65 projects and a total of 2,321 transactions. These 65 projects were considered as we had bedroom information readily available. Considering they were launched within the past decade and had sufficient transactions for our analysis, we decided to use this dataset.
The earliest of these transactions was in Martin Modern in 2017, so we’re only looking at transactions that occurred within the past five to six years as anything before that would be subject to different environments (cooling measures, etc). We only looked at transactions that were from new launch to resale, or new launch to sub sale, as the other transaction types (e.g., sub sale to resale, or resale to resale) only made up 10 transactions, which is too low a volume to consider.
Bedrooms | Avg. Profit ($) | Avg. Profit (%) | Avg Annualised (%) | Avg. Holding Period | No. of Buy/Sell Tnx |
1 | $120,787 | 16.0% | 3.7% | 4.1 | 575 |
2 | $213,483 | 19.1% | 4.6% | 4.0 | 1,100 |
3 | $367,224 | 24.3% | 5.8% | 3.9 | 646 |
This is largely in line with expectations. Larger units tended to see a higher return, with three-bedders having an ROI that’s almost 50 per cent more than one-bedders; and whilst three-bedders have a shorter holding period, it’s not by a significant margin.
From the opinions of realtors, which we’ve pointed out in many articles, this is due to the majority of condo buyers being HDB upgraders. As upgraders are almost always family units, they don’t have much use for small one and two-bedders.
But are the results the same across different regions?
One of the theories you might hear is that, in the CCR, one-bedders can do much better than in the OCR. This is on the basis that more singles, as well as more investors who want to rent to single expats, are more interested in CCR.

So to see if there’s any real difference based on region, we took a look at how these unit sizes perform in the CCR, RCR, and OCR:
Bedroom | segment | Avg. Profit ($) | Avg. Profit (%) | Avg Annualised (%) | Avg. Holding Period | No. of Buy/Sell Tnx |
1 | CCR | $97,624 | 7.5% | 2.0% | 3.4 | 12 |
RCR | $146,924 | 16.7% | 3.9% | 4.1 | 158 | |
OCR | $111,277 | 16.0% | 3.7% | 4.1 | 405 | |
2 | CCR | $166,576 | 9.8% | 2.4% | 4.0 | 48 |
RCR | $244,253 | 19.6% | 4.7% | 3.9 | 491 | |
OCR | $190,566 | 19.4% | 4.6% | 4.0 | 561 | |
3 | CCR | $456,174 | 17.7% | 3.7% | 4.4 | 42 |
RCR | $409,946 | 24.5% | 6.0% | 3.8 | 203 | |
OCR | $336,281 | 24.9% | 6.0% | 3.9 | 401 |
More from Stacked
Are Older One- and Two-Bedders in District 9 Holding Up Against the New Launches? We Break It Down
District 9, home to Orchard Road and River Valley, is one of Singapore’s most exclusive addresses. But exclusivity doesn’t always…
Clearly, the theory doesn’t hold up. Notice that all the unit sizes, even the one and two-bedders, actually perform better in the OCR than in the CCR. Besides this, the pattern is consistent with the broad overview: the three bedders still perform best, followed by two-bedders and one-bedders.
As an aside, do note that performance between the OCR and RCR is very close; this may be worth keeping in mind when you come across statements like “shoeboxes in the OCR are the worst.” Percentage-wise, the results here suggest they’re no better or worse than RCR shoeboxes.
(But that being said, the RCR does have a higher average profit in absolute numbers)
Next, we look at a breakdown based on specific projects:
Project | 1BR | 2BR | 3BR |
AFFINITY AT SERANGOON | 3.1% | 3.5% | 4.2% |
AMBER PARK | 3.0% | 2.9% | 3.6% |
AVENUE SOUTH RESIDENCE | 4.0% | 3.3% | 4.6% |
FORETT AT BUKIT TIMAH | 0.7% | 5.4% | 7.1% |
FOURTH AVENUE RESIDENCES | 1.1% | 2.7% | 4.1% |
JADESCAPE | 4.5% | 5.4% | 6.2% |
KENT RIDGE HILL RESIDENCES | 3.5% | 2.8% | 3.1% |
KOPAR AT NEWTON | 3.0% | 3.1% | 4.1% |
MAYFAIR GARDENS | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.6% |
MAYFAIR MODERN | 4.5% | 2.1% | 3.5% |
MIDWOOD | 6.6% | 5.5% | 5.8% |
PARC CLEMATIS | 5.0% | 5.7% | 7.6% |
PARC ESTA | 4.1% | 5.9% | 7.3% |
PARC KOMO | 2.9% | 4.4% | 4.3% |
PARK COLONIAL | 3.6% | 3.5% | 5.1% |
PENROSE | 3.0% | 6.4% | 8.3% |
RIVERFRONT RESIDENCES | 3.8% | 4.2% | 5.7% |
SENGKANG GRAND RESIDENCES | 2.7% | 4.0% | 5.0% |
SKY EVERTON | 2.6% | 1.1% | 3.0% |
STIRLING RESIDENCES | 4.6% | 4.9% | 6.2% |
THE FLORENCE RESIDENCES | 3.6% | 4.6% | 5.6% |
THE JOVELL | 4.4% | 4.1% | 5.1% |
THE LINQ @ BEAUTY WORLD | 6.8% | 9.3% | 7.9% |
THE TAPESTRY | 2.4% | 3.4% | 5.2% |
TREASURE AT TAMPINES | 4.3% | 4.7% | 6.3% |
WHISTLER GRAND | 5.2% | 6.3% | 7.7% |
The same pattern still shows, with three-bedders generally outperforming smaller counterparts in most projects. There is the occasional exception though, such as The Linq @ Beauty World, where two bedders saw a higher ROI (9.3 per cent) versus three-bedders (7.9 per cent); but this irregularity could be an outlier, as there was only a single transaction for each of the one and three-bedder units there.

The advantage of one or two-bedders may be in rental yields rather than resale
For the above, we have looked only at profits upon resale. We haven’t taken into account any additional gains from rental.
For smaller units, rental yields tend to be higher, because of the lower quantum. (e.g. a $900,000 shoebox unit, rented out at $2,800 per month, would give you a gross rental yield of 3.7 per cent. A $1.8 million three-bedder unit, rented out at $4,500, has a gross yield of about three per cent.)
After you add rental gains to the equation, it’s still possible for a one or two-bedder to ultimately outperform a larger counterpart. However, this is immaterial to an owner-occupier or owner-investor, who has no intention to rent out the unit; so if you fall into such a category, you’re better off getting a bigger unit if you can.
Also, several realtors have expressed that – profits aside – three-bedders or larger units are generally quicker to sell. When it comes to resale, it’s a much smaller group of buyers (some retirees, lifelong singles, and other investors) who would consider a one or two-bedder.
The ubiquitous 4-room flat is about 960 to 1,000 sq. ft., and this is the size that most Singaporeans consider to be sufficient for a family. This is about the size of a three-bedder, among condos built since the 2010s.
For more on the Singapore private property market, as well as reviews of new and resale condos alike, follow us on Stacked. If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so here.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Property Investment Insights

Property Investment Insights Faber Residence Pricing Review: How It Compares To Nearby Resale And New Launches

Property Investment Insights Are Older One- and Two-Bedders in District 10 Holding Up Against the New Launches? We Break It Down

Property Investment Insights Old vs New Family-Sized Condos in District 9: A Data-Driven Analysis of Value in 2025

Property Investment Insights Are Older One- and Two-Bedders in District 9 Holding Up Against the New Launches? We Break It Down
Latest Posts

On The Market The Cheapest 4-Bedroom Condos You Can Buy in Singapore Right Now From $1.39M

New Launch Condo Analysis Penrith Pricing Review: How It Compares To Nearby Resale And New Launches

Property Market Commentary Why These Newly Completed Condos Have Made Owners Up to $700K in Just 5 Years

Editor's Pick Penrith Condo Review: Full-Facility Condo For Just 462 Units Near The MRT

Editor's Pick This New 706-Unit Integrated Condo at River Valley Starts From $1.298M – And the Price Raises a Big Question for Buyers

Overseas Property Investing Why Renewed Interest In Johor Will Not Help All Investors In The Iskandar Region

On The Market 5 Cheapest 5-Room HDB Flats You Can Buy Right Now From $535k

Singapore Property News The Real Reason Homes Keep Getting Snapped Up in Singapore

Editor's Pick We Toured One Of Singapore’s Most Expensive Landed Estates — Is It Really Worth The Price?

Property Market Commentary The Best Condo Rental Yields Near International Schools In Singapore Isn’t Where You’d Expect

On The Market The Cheapest 3-Bedroom Condos in Singapore You Can Buy Right Now Under $1.2M

Singapore Property News Record $1.27M Sale Makes This 30-Year-Old HDB The Town’s Priciest Yet

New Launch Condo Analysis Skye At Holland Pricing Review: How It Compares To Nearby Resale And New Launches

On The Market Three Rare Bungalows With Unique Design Hit The Market For $13.98m – Each With Over 9,300 Sq Ft Of Space

Editor's Pick Why I Sold My 40-Year-Old Jurong Flat For A Newer Bukit Panjang One: A Buyer’s Case Study
