Is This The Right Way To Cut Property Agent Numbers?

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
One way to lower prices is to take out the middleman, right?

It used to be a no-brainer for me. But over the years, I’ve been forced to admit that some middlemen (and related fee collectors) are indispensable. Like when it’s raining at two in the morning and I’m pulling an all-nighter, I’m pretty grateful I can pay platform fees for someone to magically appear at my door, with fried chicken.
Those are the small things. But when it comes to real estate, it’s not just about convenience is it? A messed-up transaction is nowhere near your fries or large drink not arriving; it can mean a thousands lost due to lapsed options, or just not getting the best offer.
So I’m not as quick to jump on the bandwagon of capping agent commissions, with the supposition that it could lower home prices. On the one hand, I do understand how this is plaguing the new launch industry: commissions for developer sales can be much higher than the two per cent “norm” paid by home sellers. There have even been cases of new launches delivering commissions of five per cent, although this also tends to happen for the toughest-to-sell units (and perhaps when developers are facing the end of their five-year ABSD deadline).

But given that these deals are between agents and developers, how sure are we that lower commissions mean lower home prices? I want to be an idealist and think that, if developers pay lower commissions, we’ll all be charged less per square foot; but another part of me believes that if the agents charge less, the developers will maintain the price and just pocket more profit.
It would certainly be a strong temptation on the developers’ part, given their rapidly shrinking margins.
But who remembers when property prices were at a high too in the earlier years like 2007? My memory might be failing me a little here, but I don’t think new launch commissions were as high as they are today.
The biggest problem? It’s the 5 year ABSD that developers have to sell by. With the high financial penalty of not clearing all the units (and while that has been relaxed), they have to resort to such means. It’s either lower your prices and piss off the earliest buyers, or push commissions high enough so that agents are incentivised to sell your project.
Then there’s the issue of there being too many agents. In truth, real estate agents have always numbered around 30,000+ over the past few years; the industry does suffer from a high churn rate. It’s also worth noting many who have a CEA license don’t actually transact. And some are cases like this one.
I don’t know if capping commissions will actually decrease the number of agents though – in my experience, sales (be it insurance, property, etc.) will always draw a large initial crop of hopefuls, which then thins out fast.
Anyway, for new launches, I think the problem isn’t that there’s too many agents, but that there’s too few property agencies
It’s more or less an oligopoly at this point. Developers have few options besides the “big three” property agencies; and if there’s ever an attempt to collaborate and fix higher commissions (not that I’m saying there is), we might all have an industry-wide issue.
More from Stacked
Humility Is The Greatest Investment Strategy. Here’re 5 Reasons Why.
I listened to the story with fascination as the property agent shared with me the story about how his seller…
Then there’s the issue of the resale market.
For starters, I would imagine one of the industry players against capping commissions isn’t just the agents, but the property portals that sell listing space. This is already a huge portion of where agents’ marketing budgets go, and with fewer agents and lower commissions, they would certainly not want such a move.

But we’re not here to worry about the health of portal sites: a more immediate concern is the quality of service. Consider, for instance, someone who urgently needs to sell their home, before the six-month ABSD deadline. If there’s an absolute cap on commissions – say 1.5 per cent – there’s a question of how many agents are willing to go through the expense of aggressive marketing, dropping everything to focus on this one listing, staging the unit to make videos, etc.
If the remuneration doesn’t justify the effort, such buyers may find themselves on their own, or with agents who do the proverbial half-past-six job because they see low hopes of success anyway.
As is, we already have agents who refuse to pick up the phone to co-broke; this will be much worse if those agents have a capped commission, and have already spent way too much refreshing a listing.

So I think the agent’s marketing budget should be discussed in more detail, with the clients. I think it would go a long way for some agents to better describe the likely costs they’re looking at, in relation to their commissions. This could absolve the agent if the lower commissions show slower results (at least they don’t look like they’re doing nothing), and help sellers to temper their expectations.
Meanwhile in other property news…
- A recently MOP’ed 4-room flat for $618,000? They can still be found, and here’s where.
- We have some really high profile flats about to join the resale market in ‘24 and ‘25, so keep your eyes out for these ones.
- Trying to decide between the “big three” new launches in the East? Here’s how to compare between Grand Dunman, Tembusu Grand, and the Continuum.
- It’s discounts galore, with some projects shaving off as much as $650,000. See if you find these to be worth it.
- Fernhill: it’s near Orchard, it’s low density, and it’s so low profile you may never have noticed. Check out this surprisingly cheap (for its location) enclave.
Weekly Sales Roundup (22 April – 28 April)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
32 GILSTEAD | $14,543,000 | 4209 | $3,455 | FH |
WATTEN HOUSE | $4,996,000 | 1539 | $3,246 | FH |
TEMBUSU GRAND | $3,363,000 | 1432 | $2,349 | 99 yrs (2022) |
LENTOR MANSION | $3,342,000 | 1485 | $2,250 | 99 yrs (2023) |
GRAND DUNMAN | $3,256,000 | 1292 | $2,521 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
THE LAKEGARDEN RESIDENCES | $1,224,200 | 527 | $2,321 | 99 yrs (2023) |
HILLHAVEN | $1,367,140 | 678 | $2,016 | 99 yrs (2023) |
THE LANDMARK | $1,432,000 | 495 | $2,892 | 99 yrs (2020) |
THE MYST | $1,502,000 | 678 | $2,215 | 99 yrs (2023) |
LENTORIA | $1,561,000 | 732 | $2,133 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ARDMORE PARK | $12,500,000 | 2885 | $4,333 | FH |
THE RESIDENCES AT W SINGAPORE SENTOSA COVE | $6,110,000 | 3348 | $1,825 | 99 yrs (2006) |
AALTO | $5,820,000 | 2443 | $2,382 | FH |
THE LUMOS | $5,700,000 | 2433 | $2,343 | FH |
THE TRIZON | $4,215,000 | 1894 | $2,225 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
EIGHT COURTYARDS | $700,000 | 549 | $1,275 | 99 yrs (2010) |
SYCAMORE TREE | $700,000 | 344 | $2,032 | FH |
THE GREENWICH | $710,000 | 603 | $1,178 | 99 yrs (2009) |
URBAN VISTA | $725,000 | 441 | $1,643 | 99 yrs (2012) |
CENTRA HEIGHTS | $738,888 | 431 | $1,716 | FH |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
ARDMORE PARK | $12,500,000 | 2885 | $4,333 | $6,500,000 | 17 Years |
SPANISH VILLAGE | $4,200,000 | 2056 | $2,043 | $2,700,000 | 28 Years |
AALTO | $5,820,000 | 2443 | $2,382 | $2,170,000 | 9 Years |
PANDAN VALLEY | $3,818,000 | 2325 | $1,642 | $1,993,000 | 15 Years |
MERA SPRINGS | $2,500,888 | 1292 | $1,936 | $1,635,888 | 18 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
THE LUMOS | $5,700,000 | 2433 | $2,343 | -$2,520,450 | 17 Years |
THE SCOTTS TOWER | $1,300,000 | 657 | $1,980 | -$1,386,828 | 11 Years |
DUO RESIDENCES | $1,450,000 | 646 | $2,245 | -$147,000 | 10 Years |
THE GREENWICH | $710,000 | 603 | $1,178 | -$120,000 | 12 Years |
WATERSCAPE AT CAVENAGH | $1,038,000 | 581 | $1,786 | -$5,000 | 14 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

Follow us on Stacked for in-depth reviews of new and resale condos alike.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News

Singapore Property News The Trick to Seeing Through a Condo Showflat (Most Buyers Never Do This)

Singapore Property News So Is The 99-1 Property Split Strategy Legal Or Not?

Singapore Property News Higher 2025 Seller’s Stamp Duty Rates Just Dropped: Should Buyers And Sellers Be Worried?

Singapore Property News They Paid Rent On Time—And Still Got Evicted. Here’s The Messy Truth About Subletting In Singapore.
Latest Posts

New Launch Condo Analysis This New 376-Unit Condo In Sembawang Might Be The Best Pick For Young Families: Here’s Why

Landed Home Tours Where To Find Freehold Semi-D Landed Homes From $4.4m: Touring Gilstead Road

Overseas Property Investing Can You Really Buy A House In Italy For €1? Here’s What Singaporeans Should Know

On The Market 5 Cheapest 5-Room HDB Flats Near MRT Stations From $550k

Pro Why Seletar Park Residence Underperformed—Despite Its District 28 Location And Large Unit Sizes

On The Market Inside A Luxury Waterfront Home at The Residences At W Singapore Sentosa Cove

New Launch Condo Analysis Singapore’s Tallest New Condo Comes With the Highest Infinity Pool: Is The 63-Storey Promenade Peak Worth A Look?

Property Market Commentary We Tracked The Rise Of Million-Dollar HDB Flats By Estate — And The Results May Surprise You

Editor's Pick LyndenWoods Condo Pricing Breakdown: We Compare Its Pricing Against Bloomsbury Residences, Normanton Park & One-North Eden

Property Market Commentary 2-Bedder vs 2+Study Units: Which Condo Layout Has Better Returns Over The Last Decade?

Homeowner Stories Does The “Sell One, Buy Two” Strategy Still Work In 2025? 3 Real Stories From Singapore Homeowners

Editor's Pick Where $4 Million Semi-Ds Sit Next To $40 Million GCBs: Touring First Avenue In Bukit Timah

New Launch Condo Reviews Transforming A Dual-Key Into A Family-Friendly 4-Bedder: We Revisit Nava Grove’s New Layout

On The Market 5 Cheapest HDB Flats Near MRT Stations Under $500,000

Editor's Pick The Robertson Opus Review: A Rare 999-Year New Launch Condo Priced From $1.37m
