Why Rejecting The First Property Offer In Singapore Could Cost You


A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Imagine you’re a property agent, and the very first offer for a property you’re selling is very high.
That’s a good thing, right? Logically, yes. But once you factor in how people think and behave, it gets more complicated and can be worrying for realtors. A property agent can spend many more hours pondering how to break the news of a high early offer, compared to a later one. I’ve mentioned the nature of price anchoring in other articles before, but this is a different manifestation.
To understand this, we need to consider the “lifespan” of a listing.
When a property is first listed—or fresh, so to speak—inquiries and offers can come in fast. Buyers who have been scanning the area or project for some time are quick to notice and want to compare the new player. After a certain period, say two to three weeks, the excitement tends to die down a bit, and fewer offers may emerge.
After a listing has been around for months, it’s said to have gone stale, and offers tend to be both fewer and lower (because buyers assume something is wrong with the property, and that’s why no one is biting).
This means that sometimes, the early offers are the best ones. It’s not always true, but it often is.
The problem is that sellers are sometimes reluctant to accept the earliest offers. If an offer is made within two days of the listing, for example, they may feel it’s too soon and decide to wait for other, potentially higher offers.
This is where the danger of the high first offer comes into play.
Consider a unit worth $1.8 million (for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume that is its true value). The first offer, which comes in mere days after the listing, is for $2.2 million.
The seller turns this down, hoping to hear other offers. But those subsequent offers are more realistic, hovering around $1.75 million to $1.9 million. In the meantime, the first prospective buyers have moved on and bought another property.
The danger is that, due to price anchoring, the sellers may now be unable to move on from their $2.2 million expectation.
They were offered that by the first buyer, so why wouldn’t someone else offer the same? Despite their agent’s pleading, some will insist on holding out until they get another $2.2 million offer.
But the longer they wait, the more stale their listing becomes—and the more unrealistic that $2.2 million amount appears. Eventually, the property agent gets blamed and possibly replaced, while the sellers end up having to wait even longer to upgrade, right-size, etc. It’s a lose-lose situation for everyone involved.
More from Stacked
China’s $90 Billion Property Crisis: 4 Important Lessons We Can Learn From In Singapore
China’s developer crisis has wiped out around US$90 billion in market value, and home prices there have fallen for 11…
That’s why, when a high initial offer comes in, an experienced property agent would have already done the prep work to manage expectations. They know they need to really drive home the point and get the seller to take the money and run—because there’s a good chance there won’t be a second opportunity. In essence, it becomes the property agent’s persuasive power versus the seller’s desire to throw the proverbial dice a few more times.
This is a good lesson for sellers to keep in mind to prevent self-sabotage:
First, don’t let the joy of a high initial offer lead to unnecessary risks. Have a clear target for how much you need for your property. Once that target is met, take the money and go—don’t tempt fate by seeing if a higher one will come along.
Second, if you’ve already tempted fate by turning down a good initial offer, and subsequent ones are getting worse, then maybe it’s time to let it go. You may have to accept that the opportunity is lost, and take the next most reasonable offer, before the offers get even lower, or stop altogether.
Meanwhile, in other property news:
- For those who need to live near JB, here are the cheapest condos near the Causeway right now!
- These are the best layouts we’ve seen for new launches in 2025, so far in the year.
- New launch two-bedders are so expensive; so why aren’t buyers flocking to resale two-bedders instead? There are some possible reasons.
- Check out how this project blends modern and vintage for a fresh look.
Weekly Sales Roundup (17 March – 23 March)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
CANNINGHILL PIERS | $5,681,000 | 1959 | $2,900 | 99 yrs (2021) |
WATTEN HOUSE | $5,063,000 | 1539 | $3,289 | FH |
MEYER BLUE | $4,685,000 | 1528 | $3,065 | FH |
TEMBUSU GRAND | $4,244,000 | 1711 | $2,480 | 99 years |
THE CONTINUUM | $3,836,000 | 1292 | $2,970 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
PARKTOWN RESIDENCE | $1,262,000 | 506 | $2,495 | 99 yrs (2023) |
NORTH GAIA | $1,308,000 | 958 | $1,365 | 99 yrs (2021) |
HILL HOUSE | $1,358,000 | 431 | $3,154 | 99 years |
NOVO PLACE | $1,440,000 | 883 | $1,631 | 99 yrs (2023) |
LUMINA GRAND | $1,461,000 | 936 | $1,560 | 99 years |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ST THOMAS SUITES | $16,030,000 | 7686 | $2,086 | FH |
THE ORCHARD RESIDENCES | $9,480,000 | 2852 | $3,323 | 99 yrs (2006) |
HILLTOPS | $6,235,000 | 1711 | $3,643 | FH |
BELLE VUE RESIDENCES | $5,450,000 | 2304 | $2,366 | FH |
NOUVEL 18 | $5,450,000 | 1765 | $3,087 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
VACANZA @ EAST | $728,000 | 484 | $1,503 | FH |
EUHABITAT | $743,800 | 527 | $1,410 | 99 yrs (2010) |
THE TAPESTRY | $750,000 | 441 | $1,699 | 99 yrs (2017) |
LE QUEST | $780,000 | 495 | $1,575 | 99 yrs (2016) |
REZI 35 | $785,000 | 452 | $1,736 | FH |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
MEYER BLUE | $4,685,000 | 1528 | $3,065 | $3,615,000 | 26 Years |
COTE D’AZUR | $3,180,000 | 1539 | $2,066 | $2,190,810 | 23 Years |
CLOVER BY THE PARK | $3,288,000 | 1733 | $1,897 | $2,017,000 | 17 Years |
THE TESSARINA | $3,080,000 | 1324 | $2,326 | $1,870,000 | 25 Years |
SOMMERVILLE PARK | $4,430,000 | 1948 | $2,274 | $1,730,000 | 10 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
ST THOMAS SUITES | $16,030,000 | 7686 | $2,086 | -$6,300,000 | 14 Years |
THE COAST AT SENTOSA COVE | $3,290,000 | 2024 | $1,626 | -$1,365,200 | 14 Years |
THE ORCHARD RESIDENCES | $9,480,000 | 2852 | $3,323 | -$1,357,600 | 18 Years |
ONE SHENTON | $2,880,000 | 1593 | $1,808 | -$667,320 | 18 Years |
ICON | $1,800,000 | 1119 | $1,608 | -$270,000 | 15 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

For more on the Singapore property market, follow us on Stacked.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News

Singapore Property News In a Weak Economy, This Policy Hurts Singaporean Homeowners Most

Singapore Property News Rare Mixed-Use Site At Hougang MRT And New Sembawang EC Plot Just Launched: What You Need To Know

Singapore Property News $1.16M For A 4-Room HDB In Clementi? Why This Integrated Development Commands Premium Prices

Singapore Property News Why Lower Land Prices In Singapore Don’t Mean Cheaper New Condos
Latest Posts

Property Advice The Surprising Reasons Some Singaporean Buyers Are Choosing Smaller Condo Units (Even When They Can Afford More)

Landed Home Tours Touring Onan Road, A Freehold Landed Estate With A “Hidden” Enclave Of Shophouses

Overseas Property Investing I’m A Singaporean House-Hunting In Mexico City: Here’s What 2 Weeks On The Ground Taught Me

Homeowner Stories I’ve Lived In Braddell View For 14 Years: What It’s Like To Live In Singapore’s Largest Residential Site

Property Investment Insights Why Some 30-Year-Old Leasehold Condos Are Still Outperforming New Ones

Pro How Do Old Leasehold Condos Hold Up Against Newer Projects? A Case Study Of Orchid Park

On The Market 5 Cheapest 4 Room HDB Flats In Central Singapore (From $495K)

Homeowner Stories Why These Buyers Chose Older Leasehold Condos—And Have No Regrets

Editor's Pick Arina East Residences Review: First Condo Launch in Tanjong Rhu in 13 Years, Near MRT Station

Pro Do Mega-Developments Really Outperform Regular Condos? A Parc Clematis Vs Clavon Case Study

Pro Affinity at Serangoon vs The Garden Residences: Same Launch Year, Same Location — But Which Gave Better Capital Gains?

Editor's Pick 4 Potential Residential En Bloc Sites That Could Be Worth Watching In 2025

Property Market Commentary Can Singapore’s Housing Market Handle A Rapidly Ageing Population?

Editor's Pick We Tour Freehold Landed Homes Within 1km Of Tao Nan & CHIJ Katong (From $3.88M In 2021)

Editor's Pick Why I Bought A $1.45 Million 2-Bedder At ELTA: A Buyer’s Case Study
