Are Old Freehold Condos Still Profitable In Singapore?


A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
In theory, freehold condos should continue to appreciate well over the years. One common argument you’ll hear, for example, is that because developers won’t need to top up the lease, freehold projects have better en-bloc value and potential. But there’s growing skepticism these days, as some ponder whether maintaining a condo for 40+ years is truly viable – and with new projects appearing nearby, could a very old condo still appreciate well, even if it’s freehold? We took a look:
Average freehold condo prices based on age:
Year/Age | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | 40 Years Or More | Grand Total |
2014 | $1,609 | $1,249 | $1,212 | $1,194 | $1,003 | $1,510 |
2015 | $1,588 | $1,222 | $1,124 | $1,148 | $1,029 | $1,441 |
2016 | $1,663 | $1,210 | $1,100 | $1,140 | $1,051 | $1,475 |
2017 | $1,705 | $1,235 | $1,167 | $1,180 | $1,172 | $1,505 |
2018 | $1,821 | $1,345 | $1,238 | $1,320 | $1,264 | $1,620 |
2019 | $2,118 | $1,444 | $1,308 | $1,342 | $1,279 | $1,804 |
2020 | $1,963 | $1,423 | $1,290 | $1,359 | $1,169 | $1,695 |
2021 | $2,057 | $1,621 | $1,384 | $1,445 | $1,364 | $1,816 |
2022 | $2,280 | $1,741 | $1,507 | $1,625 | $1,622 | $1,999 |
2023 | $2,459 | $1,846 | $1,617 | $1,671 | $1,567 | $2,117 |
2024 | $2,427 | $1,873 | $1,702 | $1,627 | $1,592 | $2,000 |
Grand Total | $1,944 | $1,492 | $1,346 | $1,375 | $1,381 | $1,730 |
This shows the average price per square foot of a freehold condo, upon each decade it ages. For those who are interested in how it measures up versus leasehold, you can compare it to this article.
Based on the linked article, leasehold condos that are 10 years old or under average $1,410 psf, which is about 31.8 per cent lower than a freehold equivalent.
At 40+ years old, the average leasehold condo is around $997 psf, which is about 32.9 per cent lower than a freehold counterpart. This is a very slim difference, and suggests that leasehold may not fall as drastically as expected versus freehold; not even after 40+ years.

Another interesting point here is that, if you’re willing to settle for a condo that’s 30+ years old, you may be looking at a quantum of $1.6 million to $1.7 million for a 1,000 sq. ft. (roughly three-bedder) unit.
So a freehold, family-sized condo unit may still be within reach for upgraders in 2024, if they can bear with an ageing property located further away.
Let’s look at how much freehold condos appreciate on average, based on age:
More from Stacked
Should You Buy 8@BT? A Pricing Review Comparison With The Reserve Residences And The Linq @ Beauty World
The official prices for 8@BT aren’t out yet, but the developers have indicated a starting $PSF of $2,530. With that,…
Year/Age | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | 40 Years Or More |
2014 | |||||
2015 | -1.33% | -2.12% | -7.27% | -3.85% | 2.65% |
2016 | 4.75% | -1.02% | -2.20% | -0.69% | 2.17% |
2017 | 2.50% | 2.13% | 6.14% | 3.53% | 11.47% |
2018 | 6.84% | 8.91% | 6.11% | 11.83% | 7.83% |
2019 | 16.32% | 7.33% | 5.65% | 1.63% | 1.19% |
2020 | -7.35% | -1.47% | -1.37% | 1.29% | -8.61% |
2021 | 4.81% | 13.96% | 7.26% | 6.31% | 16.69% |
2022 | 10.84% | 7.38% | 8.89% | 12.52% | 18.89% |
2023 | 7.84% | 6.05% | 7.27% | 2.82% | -3.39% |
2024 | -1.31% | 1.46% | 5.28% | -2.66% | 1.64% |
Grand Total | 4.39% | 4.26% | 3.58% | 3.27% | 5.05% |
Total Volume | 33277 | 14368 | 7136 | 2195 | 569 |
The condos seem to fare better in the first two decades (perhaps because the condo isn’t considered “very old” yet), or toward the 40+ year mark, when we may be seeing a long holding period show its rewards.
Average percentage gains or losses during transactions
Row Labels | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | More Than 40 Years Old | Grand Total |
2014 | 7.8% | 20.7% | 26.4% | 13.0% | 31.3% | 11.0% |
2015 | 11.9% | 24.6% | 29.1% | 31.7% | 46.0% | 16.4% |
2016 | 14.6% | 31.0% | 31.3% | 35.3% | 21.5% | 20.3% |
2017 | 15.6% | 29.1% | 31.8% | 34.4% | 24.4% | 21.0% |
2018 | 11.7% | 21.1% | 23.8% | 34.7% | 28.9% | 16.0% |
2019 | 13.7% | 26.4% | 33.3% | 33.1% | 24.7% | 19.5% |
2020 | 18.4% | 30.6% | 34.5% | 32.8% | 34.2% | 24.6% |
2021 | 13.7% | 24.0% | 24.4% | 7.5% | 32.1% | 18.9% |
2022 | 8.1% | 33.3% | 12.4% | 6.3% | 15.0% | |
2023 | 1.5% | 4.1% | 2.5% | |||
Grand Total | 12.5% | 25.9% | 29.0% | 31.8% | 26.9% | 17.5% |
The highest percentage gains seem to come from selling between the 30 to 40-year mark, but not after. Similar to leasehold counterparts, profits may weaken past the 40-year mark due to financing issues. Banks tend to lower the maximum loan quantum at that point, which necessitates a higher cash outlay; and this may in turn exert downward pressure on prices.
Looking at performance by District
Profitability
Year/District | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D23 | D26 | D27 | D28 | Grand Total |
2014 | 7% | 8% | 6% | 12% | 7% | 5% | 12% | 11% | 9% | 14% | 7% | 17% | 17% | 5% | 4% | 10% | 8% | 18% | 21% | 1% | 9% | 14% | 11% | ||
2015 | 6% | 31% | 21% | 9% | 13% | 20% | 14% | 12% | 18% | 13% | 18% | 27% | 17% | 9% | 11% | 11% | 26% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 23% | 16% | |||
2016 | 31% | 9% | 21% | 7% | 16% | 16% | 22% | 20% | 18% | 13% | 12% | 23% | 25% | 20% | 15% | 14% | 33% | 29% | 33% | 27% | 24% | 20% | |||
2017 | 31% | 8% | 33% | 11% | 22% | 15% | 17% | 21% | 18% | 20% | 16% | 14% | 24% | 30% | 27% | 17% | 20% | 30% | 31% | 33% | 47% | 35% | 21% | ||
2018 | 5% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 12% | 15% | 15% | 14% | 16% | 14% | 17% | 19% | 23% | 31% | 17% | 17% | 25% | 21% | 11% | 38% | 34% | 16% | |||
2019 | 9% | 21% | 6% | 18% | 22% | 9% | 19% | 21% | 13% | 32% | 17% | 22% | 28% | 21% | 27% | 17% | 26% | 26% | 39% | 32% | 20% | ||||
2020 | 13% | 22% | 25% | 24% | 9% | 27% | 19% | 25% | 25% | 23% | 28% | 24% | 35% | 26% | 15% | 22% | 33% | 41% | 44% | 25% | |||||
2021 | 10% | 33% | -15% | 9% | 8% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 16% | 14% | 27% | 27% | 43% | 15% | 19% | ||||||||||
2022 | 3% | 16% | 37% | 4% | 7% | 15% | 11% | 15% | |||||||||||||||||
2023 | 0% | 2% | -2% | 10% | 3% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total | 23% | 8% | 21% | 9% | 17% | 7% | 12% | 12% | 19% | 16% | 15% | 18% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 20% | 8% | 15% | 14% | 26% | 26% | 26% | 29% | 24% | 18% |
Volume
Year/District | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D23 | D26 | D27 | D28 | Grand Total |
2014 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 58 | 43 | 98 | 109 | 66 | 72 | 5 | 109 | 163 | 18 | 29 | 5 | 74 | 12 | 52 | 28 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 974 | ||
2015 | 4 | 1 | 33 | 27 | 76 | 116 | 60 | 62 | 24 | 71 | 163 | 18 | 26 | 3 | 64 | 22 | 46 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 854 | |||
2016 | 10 | 11 | 23 | 1 | 28 | 76 | 121 | 62 | 45 | 10 | 67 | 151 | 13 | 16 | 49 | 23 | 44 | 28 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 803 | |||
2017 | 2 | 18 | 9 | 4 | 42 | 30 | 100 | 162 | 72 | 85 | 25 | 97 | 199 | 23 | 35 | 63 | 10 | 68 | 36 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 1099 | ||
2018 | 6 | 7 | 38 | 20 | 75 | 95 | 55 | 96 | 10 | 87 | 141 | 15 | 21 | 1 | 55 | 7 | 39 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 803 | |||
2019 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 3 | 28 | 34 | 26 | 27 | 6 | 40 | 89 | 8 | 18 | 23 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 375 | ||||
2020 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 15 | 20 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 21 | 34 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 2 | 27 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 210 | |||||
2021 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 65 | ||||||||||
2022 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
2023 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total | 3 | 56 | 43 | 19 | 222 | 1 | 157 | 474 | 672 | 357 | 410 | 85 | 499 | 965 | 97 | 159 | 9 | 341 | 82 | 291 | 165 | 43 | 21 | 29 | 5200 |
Unfortunately, this isn’t too useful, because freehold properties tend to cluster heavily in some areas but are very rare in others.
In Districts 9 and 10 for example (the Orchard to Bukit Timah areas), it’s more common to find older freehold rather than leasehold properties; conversely, District 25 (Woodlands) doesn’t even appear, as almost everything there is leasehold.
For some of these districts, the transaction volume is so low that the “average” gains don’t mean much, and prices can be volatile. So the gains in Districts like 9 or 10 may provide a more accurate depiction of the area (we’d be careful with District 15, as the area includes many boutique freehold condos that can be quite volatile).
When is the freehold premium worth paying?
In general, the freehold premium (about 15 to 20 per cent higher than a leasehold) only starts to pay for itself much later on. If you’re going to sell within a short period like 10 years, for example, the freehold status doesn’t really mean much; but if you’re selling only in 30+ years, then it may prove its worth without the lease decay.

Due to the long holding period, a concern for homeowners is how well the condo is maintained. This could be an issue in very big developments with lots of facilities – you have to question if the multiple swimming pools, landscaped areas, BBQ pits, etc. will still look good after you hold for so long. Freehold status protects your property from lease decay, but not from declining condo management.
For more on the Singapore private property market, as well as reviews of new and resale condos alike, follow us on Stacked. If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so here.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Property Investment Insights

Property Investment Insights Why Some 30-Year-Old Leasehold Condos Are Still Outperforming New Ones

Property Investment Insights How Do Old Leasehold Condos Hold Up Against Newer Projects? A Case Study Of Orchid Park

Property Investment Insights Do Mega-Developments Really Outperform Regular Condos? A Parc Clematis Vs Clavon Case Study

Property Investment Insights Affinity at Serangoon vs The Garden Residences: Same Launch Year, Same Location — But Which Gave Better Capital Gains?
Latest Posts

Landed Home Tours Touring Onan Road, A Freehold Landed Estate With A “Hidden” Enclave Of Shophouses

Singapore Property News In a Weak Economy, This Policy Hurts Singaporean Homeowners Most

Overseas Property Investing I’m A Singaporean House-Hunting In Mexico City: Here’s What 2 Weeks On The Ground Taught Me

Homeowner Stories I’ve Lived In Braddell View For 14 Years: What It’s Like To Live In Singapore’s Largest Residential Site

Singapore Property News Rare Mixed-Use Site At Hougang MRT And New Sembawang EC Plot Just Launched: What You Need To Know

On The Market 5 Cheapest 4 Room HDB Flats In Central Singapore (From $495K)

Homeowner Stories Why These Buyers Chose Older Leasehold Condos—And Have No Regrets

Singapore Property News $1.16M For A 4-Room HDB In Clementi? Why This Integrated Development Commands Premium Prices

Editor's Pick Arina East Residences Review: First Condo Launch in Tanjong Rhu in 13 Years, Near MRT Station

Editor's Pick 4 Potential Residential En Bloc Sites That Could Be Worth Watching In 2025

Property Market Commentary Can Singapore’s Housing Market Handle A Rapidly Ageing Population?

Editor's Pick We Tour Freehold Landed Homes Within 1km Of Tao Nan & CHIJ Katong (From $3.88M In 2021)

Singapore Property News Why Lower Land Prices In Singapore Don’t Mean Cheaper New Condos

Singapore Property News Ang Mo Kio’s Most Expensive 5-Room HDB Flat Sold For $1.5 Million: Here’s Why

On The Market 5 Cheapest 5-Room HDB Flats In Central Singapore (Under $750,000)

Maybe an old condo comes with a plot ratio that is lower than maximum allowance,
whereas newer condos would have been built to latest max plot ratio allowed