Are Old Freehold Condos Still Profitable In Singapore?

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
In theory, freehold condos should continue to appreciate well over the years. One common argument you’ll hear, for example, is that because developers won’t need to top up the lease, freehold projects have better en-bloc value and potential. But there’s growing skepticism these days, as some ponder whether maintaining a condo for 40+ years is truly viable – and with new projects appearing nearby, could a very old condo still appreciate well, even if it’s freehold? We took a look:
Average freehold condo prices based on age:
Year/Age | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | 40 Years Or More | Grand Total |
2014 | $1,609 | $1,249 | $1,212 | $1,194 | $1,003 | $1,510 |
2015 | $1,588 | $1,222 | $1,124 | $1,148 | $1,029 | $1,441 |
2016 | $1,663 | $1,210 | $1,100 | $1,140 | $1,051 | $1,475 |
2017 | $1,705 | $1,235 | $1,167 | $1,180 | $1,172 | $1,505 |
2018 | $1,821 | $1,345 | $1,238 | $1,320 | $1,264 | $1,620 |
2019 | $2,118 | $1,444 | $1,308 | $1,342 | $1,279 | $1,804 |
2020 | $1,963 | $1,423 | $1,290 | $1,359 | $1,169 | $1,695 |
2021 | $2,057 | $1,621 | $1,384 | $1,445 | $1,364 | $1,816 |
2022 | $2,280 | $1,741 | $1,507 | $1,625 | $1,622 | $1,999 |
2023 | $2,459 | $1,846 | $1,617 | $1,671 | $1,567 | $2,117 |
2024 | $2,427 | $1,873 | $1,702 | $1,627 | $1,592 | $2,000 |
Grand Total | $1,944 | $1,492 | $1,346 | $1,375 | $1,381 | $1,730 |
This shows the average price per square foot of a freehold condo, upon each decade it ages. For those who are interested in how it measures up versus leasehold, you can compare it to this article.
Based on the linked article, leasehold condos that are 10 years old or under average $1,410 psf, which is about 31.8 per cent lower than a freehold equivalent.
At 40+ years old, the average leasehold condo is around $997 psf, which is about 32.9 per cent lower than a freehold counterpart. This is a very slim difference, and suggests that leasehold may not fall as drastically as expected versus freehold; not even after 40+ years.

Another interesting point here is that, if you’re willing to settle for a condo that’s 30+ years old, you may be looking at a quantum of $1.6 million to $1.7 million for a 1,000 sq. ft. (roughly three-bedder) unit.
So a freehold, family-sized condo unit may still be within reach for upgraders in 2024, if they can bear with an ageing property located further away.
Let’s look at how much freehold condos appreciate on average, based on age:
More from Stacked
5 Reasons Why The Reserve Residences Sold 71% Of Its 732 Units During Launch
Several market watchers are surprised at the strong sales of The Reserve Residences, so soon after the latest cooling measures…
Year/Age | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | 40 Years Or More |
2014 | |||||
2015 | -1.33% | -2.12% | -7.27% | -3.85% | 2.65% |
2016 | 4.75% | -1.02% | -2.20% | -0.69% | 2.17% |
2017 | 2.50% | 2.13% | 6.14% | 3.53% | 11.47% |
2018 | 6.84% | 8.91% | 6.11% | 11.83% | 7.83% |
2019 | 16.32% | 7.33% | 5.65% | 1.63% | 1.19% |
2020 | -7.35% | -1.47% | -1.37% | 1.29% | -8.61% |
2021 | 4.81% | 13.96% | 7.26% | 6.31% | 16.69% |
2022 | 10.84% | 7.38% | 8.89% | 12.52% | 18.89% |
2023 | 7.84% | 6.05% | 7.27% | 2.82% | -3.39% |
2024 | -1.31% | 1.46% | 5.28% | -2.66% | 1.64% |
Grand Total | 4.39% | 4.26% | 3.58% | 3.27% | 5.05% |
Total Volume | 33277 | 14368 | 7136 | 2195 | 569 |
The condos seem to fare better in the first two decades (perhaps because the condo isn’t considered “very old” yet), or toward the 40+ year mark, when we may be seeing a long holding period show its rewards.
Average percentage gains or losses during transactions
Row Labels | Less Than 10 Years Old | Less Than 20 Years Old | Less Than 30 Years Old | Less Than 40 Years Old | More Than 40 Years Old | Grand Total |
2014 | 7.8% | 20.7% | 26.4% | 13.0% | 31.3% | 11.0% |
2015 | 11.9% | 24.6% | 29.1% | 31.7% | 46.0% | 16.4% |
2016 | 14.6% | 31.0% | 31.3% | 35.3% | 21.5% | 20.3% |
2017 | 15.6% | 29.1% | 31.8% | 34.4% | 24.4% | 21.0% |
2018 | 11.7% | 21.1% | 23.8% | 34.7% | 28.9% | 16.0% |
2019 | 13.7% | 26.4% | 33.3% | 33.1% | 24.7% | 19.5% |
2020 | 18.4% | 30.6% | 34.5% | 32.8% | 34.2% | 24.6% |
2021 | 13.7% | 24.0% | 24.4% | 7.5% | 32.1% | 18.9% |
2022 | 8.1% | 33.3% | 12.4% | 6.3% | 15.0% | |
2023 | 1.5% | 4.1% | 2.5% | |||
Grand Total | 12.5% | 25.9% | 29.0% | 31.8% | 26.9% | 17.5% |
The highest percentage gains seem to come from selling between the 30 to 40-year mark, but not after. Similar to leasehold counterparts, profits may weaken past the 40-year mark due to financing issues. Banks tend to lower the maximum loan quantum at that point, which necessitates a higher cash outlay; and this may in turn exert downward pressure on prices.
Looking at performance by District
Profitability
Year/District | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D23 | D26 | D27 | D28 | Grand Total |
2014 | 7% | 8% | 6% | 12% | 7% | 5% | 12% | 11% | 9% | 14% | 7% | 17% | 17% | 5% | 4% | 10% | 8% | 18% | 21% | 1% | 9% | 14% | 11% | ||
2015 | 6% | 31% | 21% | 9% | 13% | 20% | 14% | 12% | 18% | 13% | 18% | 27% | 17% | 9% | 11% | 11% | 26% | 21% | 26% | 16% | 23% | 16% | |||
2016 | 31% | 9% | 21% | 7% | 16% | 16% | 22% | 20% | 18% | 13% | 12% | 23% | 25% | 20% | 15% | 14% | 33% | 29% | 33% | 27% | 24% | 20% | |||
2017 | 31% | 8% | 33% | 11% | 22% | 15% | 17% | 21% | 18% | 20% | 16% | 14% | 24% | 30% | 27% | 17% | 20% | 30% | 31% | 33% | 47% | 35% | 21% | ||
2018 | 5% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 12% | 15% | 15% | 14% | 16% | 14% | 17% | 19% | 23% | 31% | 17% | 17% | 25% | 21% | 11% | 38% | 34% | 16% | |||
2019 | 9% | 21% | 6% | 18% | 22% | 9% | 19% | 21% | 13% | 32% | 17% | 22% | 28% | 21% | 27% | 17% | 26% | 26% | 39% | 32% | 20% | ||||
2020 | 13% | 22% | 25% | 24% | 9% | 27% | 19% | 25% | 25% | 23% | 28% | 24% | 35% | 26% | 15% | 22% | 33% | 41% | 44% | 25% | |||||
2021 | 10% | 33% | -15% | 9% | 8% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 16% | 14% | 27% | 27% | 43% | 15% | 19% | ||||||||||
2022 | 3% | 16% | 37% | 4% | 7% | 15% | 11% | 15% | |||||||||||||||||
2023 | 0% | 2% | -2% | 10% | 3% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total | 23% | 8% | 21% | 9% | 17% | 7% | 12% | 12% | 19% | 16% | 15% | 18% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 20% | 8% | 15% | 14% | 26% | 26% | 26% | 29% | 24% | 18% |
Volume
Year/District | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D23 | D26 | D27 | D28 | Grand Total |
2014 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 58 | 43 | 98 | 109 | 66 | 72 | 5 | 109 | 163 | 18 | 29 | 5 | 74 | 12 | 52 | 28 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 974 | ||
2015 | 4 | 1 | 33 | 27 | 76 | 116 | 60 | 62 | 24 | 71 | 163 | 18 | 26 | 3 | 64 | 22 | 46 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 854 | |||
2016 | 10 | 11 | 23 | 1 | 28 | 76 | 121 | 62 | 45 | 10 | 67 | 151 | 13 | 16 | 49 | 23 | 44 | 28 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 803 | |||
2017 | 2 | 18 | 9 | 4 | 42 | 30 | 100 | 162 | 72 | 85 | 25 | 97 | 199 | 23 | 35 | 63 | 10 | 68 | 36 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 1099 | ||
2018 | 6 | 7 | 38 | 20 | 75 | 95 | 55 | 96 | 10 | 87 | 141 | 15 | 21 | 1 | 55 | 7 | 39 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 803 | |||
2019 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 3 | 28 | 34 | 26 | 27 | 6 | 40 | 89 | 8 | 18 | 23 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 375 | ||||
2020 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 15 | 20 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 21 | 34 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 2 | 27 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 210 | |||||
2021 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 65 | ||||||||||
2022 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
2023 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total | 3 | 56 | 43 | 19 | 222 | 1 | 157 | 474 | 672 | 357 | 410 | 85 | 499 | 965 | 97 | 159 | 9 | 341 | 82 | 291 | 165 | 43 | 21 | 29 | 5200 |
Unfortunately, this isn’t too useful, because freehold properties tend to cluster heavily in some areas but are very rare in others.
In Districts 9 and 10 for example (the Orchard to Bukit Timah areas), it’s more common to find older freehold rather than leasehold properties; conversely, District 25 (Woodlands) doesn’t even appear, as almost everything there is leasehold.
For some of these districts, the transaction volume is so low that the “average” gains don’t mean much, and prices can be volatile. So the gains in Districts like 9 or 10 may provide a more accurate depiction of the area (we’d be careful with District 15, as the area includes many boutique freehold condos that can be quite volatile).
When is the freehold premium worth paying?
In general, the freehold premium (about 15 to 20 per cent higher than a leasehold) only starts to pay for itself much later on. If you’re going to sell within a short period like 10 years, for example, the freehold status doesn’t really mean much; but if you’re selling only in 30+ years, then it may prove its worth without the lease decay.

Due to the long holding period, a concern for homeowners is how well the condo is maintained. This could be an issue in very big developments with lots of facilities – you have to question if the multiple swimming pools, landscaped areas, BBQ pits, etc. will still look good after you hold for so long. Freehold status protects your property from lease decay, but not from declining condo management.
For more on the Singapore private property market, as well as reviews of new and resale condos alike, follow us on Stacked. If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so here.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Property Investment Insights

Property Investment Insights Faber Residence Pricing Review: How It Compares To Nearby Resale And New Launches

Property Investment Insights Are Older One- and Two-Bedders in District 10 Holding Up Against the New Launches? We Break It Down

Property Investment Insights Old vs New Family-Sized Condos in District 9: A Data-Driven Analysis of Value in 2025

Property Investment Insights Are Older One- and Two-Bedders in District 9 Holding Up Against the New Launches? We Break It Down
Latest Posts

Editor's Pick Penrith Condo Review: Full-Facility Condo For Just 462 Units Near The MRT

Editor's Pick This New 706-Unit Integrated Condo at River Valley Starts From $1.298M – And the Price Raises a Big Question for Buyers

Overseas Property Investing Why Renewed Interest In Johor Will Not Help All Investors In The Iskandar Region

On The Market 5 Cheapest 5-Room HDB Flats You Can Buy Right Now From $535k

Singapore Property News The Real Reason Homes Keep Getting Snapped Up in Singapore

Editor's Pick We Toured One Of Singapore’s Most Expensive Landed Estates — Is It Really Worth The Price?

Property Market Commentary The Best Condo Rental Yields Near International Schools In Singapore Isn’t Where You’d Expect

On The Market The Cheapest 3-Bedroom Condos in Singapore You Can Buy Right Now Under $1.2M

Singapore Property News Record $1.27M Sale Makes This 30-Year-Old HDB The Town’s Priciest Yet

New Launch Condo Analysis Skye At Holland Pricing Review: How It Compares To Nearby Resale And New Launches

On The Market Three Rare Bungalows With Unique Design Hit The Market For $13.98m – Each With Over 9,300 Sq Ft Of Space

Editor's Pick Why I Sold My 40-Year-Old Jurong Flat For A Newer Bukit Panjang One: A Buyer’s Case Study

Editor's Pick 5 Ways To Get A Better Price For Your Property When The Market Is Changing

Property Market Commentary Are Singapore’s Oldest HDB Flats Finally Losing Value? A 2025 Price Update

Singapore Property News The World’s Real Estate Is Now Worth US$393 Trillion In 2025. Here’s Where Singapore Fits In

Maybe an old condo comes with a plot ratio that is lower than maximum allowance,
whereas newer condos would have been built to latest max plot ratio allowed