Why Some Old 99-Year Condos Can Still Be Worth Investing In: Here’s The Math
- Ryan J
- September 14, 2024
- 5 min read
- 2 2 Comments
There’s no shortage of biases in the Singapore property market. Some long-time investors swear by freehold properties, while others prefer resale homes, finding new launch prices too steep. And if you’ve spoken to a property agent, you’ve likely heard the pitch that new launches are the best choice for capital appreciation.
These assumptions have led to misconceptions, especially about older leasehold projects. Far from being obsolete, many of these developments remain solid investments – and might just be the hidden gems of the property market. To show why some of these overlooked properties deserve a second look in 2024, let’s explore some surprising comparisons:
Changi Court versus The Lakeshore
Changi Court is an older freehold property along Upper Changi Road East. This 297-unit condo was completed in 1997. While the immediate surroundings are sparse on amenities, it has several strong rental advantages: the SIA Training Centre is close to this condo, making the condo convenient for foreign staff and trainees. Second, the SUTD campus is almost next to Changi Court, making it a popular rental choice for foreign students and teaching staff. And third, the Upper Changi MRT station (DTL) is right next to this condo, which helps to make up for the fewer amenities.
The Lakeshore is newer and bigger: this leasehold, 848-unit leasehold condo is in Jurong West, and within walking distance to Lakeside MRT station (EWL). The Lakeshore does have a much nicer waterfront view though. The Lakeshore also doesn’t have any big malls nearby, though it does share some heartland amenities with the nearby HDB enclave, including an NTUC and Giant.
But does The Lakeshore’s leasehold status worsen its performance, especially since it’s coming to 20 years old? Let’s compare the two and see how it pans out:
Here’s a look at the numbers for a unit at Changi Court:
Changi Court (FH TOP 1997) | |
2016 Purchase Price | $1,120,000.00 |
Stamp Duty | $29,400.00 |
Conveyancing Fee (Legal Fees) | $3,200.00 |
Downpayment | $280,000.00 |
Annual Value | $30,000.00 |
Over 8 Years | |
Property Tax | $28,800.00 |
Rental (Y1-Y8) | $265,956.00 |
Agency Fee (Y1-Y8) | $12,078.84 |
MCST (Assumed 400/month) | $38,400.00 |
Including Returns and Costs | |
Total Rental Received | $265,956.00 |
Total Costs (incl. SD) | $111,878.84 |
Total Monthly Repayments | $331,345.28 |
PNL | -$177,268.11 |
Based on historical ROR | 3.24% |
2024 Sale Price | $1,445,000.00 |
Loan Redemption Amount | $679,719.00 |
Agency Fee | $31,501.00 |
Conveyancing Fee (Legal Fees) | $2,200.00 |
Proceeds | $731,580.00 |
Net Proceeds | $554,311.89 |
Initial Investment (Downpayment) | $312,600.00 |
Total Returns | 77.32% |
Annualized Returns | 8.53% |
Net Cost Per Year | $51,328.01 |
Average Rent Per Year | $33,244.50 |
Net Rental Yield | -1.61% |
Gross Rental Yield from Pur.P | 2.97% |
(Note that for our comparison, we are using a unit purchased in 2016)
Now let’s look at the numbers for a unit at The Lakeshore:
The Lakeshore (LH TOP 2008) | |
Purchase Price | $1,180,000.00 |
Stamp Duty | $31,800.00 |
Conveyancing Fee (Legal Fees) | $3,200.00 |
Downpayment | $295,000.00 |
Annual Value | $30,000.00 |
Over 8 Years | |
Property Tax | $28,800.00 |
Rental (Y1-Y8) | $350,550.00 |
Agency Fee (Y1-Y8) | $15,920.81 |
MCST (Assumed 400/month) | $38,400.00 |
Including Returns and Costs | |
Total Rental Received | $350,550.00 |
Total Costs (incl. SD) | $118,120.81 |
Total Monthly Repayments | $349,095.92 |
PNL | -$116,666.73 |
Based on historical ROR | 4.04% |
2024 Sale Price | $1,620,000.00 |
Loan Redemption Amount | $716,132.00 |
Agency Fee | $35,316.00 |
Conveyancing Fee (Legal Fees) | $2,200.00 |
Proceeds | $866,352.00 |
Net Proceeds | $749,685.27 |
Initial Investment (Downpayment) | $330,000.00 |
Total Returns | 127.18% |
Annualized Returns | 12.44% |
Net Cost Per Year | $54,027.09 |
Average Rent Per Year | $43,818.75 |
Net Rental Yield | -0.87% |
Gross Rental Yield from Pur.P | 3.71% |
We can see the leasehold Lakeshore outperforms Changi Court in terms of gross rental yield (3.71 per cent, compared to Changi Court’s 2.97 per cent). Note that this is true even though Lakeshore was purchased at a lower quantum.
There’s also a drastic difference in total returns: The Lakeshore unit saw 12.4 per cent annualised returns over Changi Court’s 8.5 per cent. However, this could be related to Jurong seeing much more in the way of neighbourhood improvements compared to the relatively quiet stretch along Upper Changi Road. This goes to show that sometimes if the location is on the upswing, it can outweigh concerns such as lease status.
Now let’s look at another comparison: Oleander Towers versus Bullion Park
This time let’s look at two projects that are both older, but one is a freehold condo.
Oleander Towers is a leasehold condo with 318 units, dating back to 1998. It’s quite nondescript as far as condos go, being somewhat within Toa Payoh’s HDB enclave. It’s quite easy to underestimate this project, as it blends in with the other residential high-rises; but there’s something to be said for a condo with HDB-level conveniences nearby, and access to Toa Payoh MRT (NSL).
Bullion Park, which we’ve covered for its phenomenal size (albeit in an ulu location) is a freehold project dating back to 1993. This 472 unit condo has benefitted from the emergence of Lentor MRT (TEL), which has resolved some of its longstanding accessibility issues. It’s still by far one of the most spacious condo options in District 26.
Here’s a look at the numbers for a unit at Oleander Towers:
Oleander Towers (LH TOP 1998) | |
Purchase Price | $1,138,000.00 |
Stamp Duty | $30,120.00 |
Conveyancing Fee (Legal Fees) | $3,200.00 |
Downpayment | $284,500.00 |
Annual Value | $30,000.00 |
Over 8 Years | |
Property Tax | $28,800.00 |
Rental (Y1-Y8) | $332,148.00 |
Agency Fee (Y1-Y8) | $15,085.06 |
MCST (Assumed 400/month) | $38,400.00 |
Including Returns and Costs | |
Total Rental Received | $332,148.00 |
Total Costs (incl. SD) | $115,605.06 |
Total Monthly Repayments | $336,670.47 |
PNL | -$120,127.53 |
Based on historical ROR | 4.99% |
2024 Sale Price | $1,680,000.00 |
Loan Redemption Amount | $690,643.00 |
Agency Fee | $36,624.00 |
Conveyancing Fee (Legal Fees) | $2,200.00 |
Proceeds | $950,533.00 |
Net Proceeds | $830,405.47 |
Initial Investment (Downpayment) | $317,820.00 |
Total Returns | 161.28% |
Annualized Returns | 14.71% |
Net Cost Per Year | $52,369.44 |
Average Rent Per Year | $41,518.50 |
Net Rental Yield | -0.95% |
Gross Rental Yield from Pur.P | 3.65% |
Now, here’s a look at the numbers for a unit at Bullion Park:
Bullion Park (FH TOP 1992) | |
Purchase Price | $1,120,000.00 |
Stamp Duty | $29,400.00 |
Conveyancing Fee (Legal Fees) | $3,200.00 |
Downpayment | $280,000.00 |
Annual Value | $30,000.00 |
Over 8 Years | |
Property Tax | $28,800.00 |
Rental (Y1-Y8) | $259,488.00 |
Agency Fee (Y1-Y8) | $11,785.08 |
MCST (Assumed 400/month) | $38,400.00 |
Including Returns and Costs | |
Total Rental Received | $259,488.00 |
Total Costs (incl. SD) | $111,585.08 |
Total Monthly Repayments | $331,345.28 |
PNL | -$183,442.36 |
Based on historical ROR | 4.96% |
2024 Sale Price | $1,650,000.00 |
Loan Redemption Amount | $679,719.00 |
Agency Fee | $35,970.00 |
Conveyancing Fee (Legal Fees) | $2,200.00 |
Proceeds | $932,111.00 |
Net Proceeds | $748,668.64 |
Initial Investment (Downpayment) | $312,600.00 |
Total Returns | 139.50% |
Annualized Returns | 13.29% |
Net Cost Per Year | $51,291.29 |
Average Rent Per Year | $32,436.00 |
Net Rental Yield | -1.68% |
Gross Rental Yield from Pur.P | 2.90% |
This time, we can see the annualised returns are practically neck-and-neck, with neither showing a significant edge in terms of pure gains. The tiebreaker between the two, however, comes again in the form of rent: Oleander Tower has a substantially higher gross yield at 3.65 per cent, versus Bullion Park’s 2.9 per cent.
When it comes to picking a unit for investment, beware of generalisations
There are certain theories and sayings that might apply on a collective level. If we were to bunch together all the freehold and all the leasehold condos*, or all the old and the new ones, we may see that in general, one group performs better than the other.
This may not help the individual investor choosing a specific unit, however, as the property market is chock full of exceptions to every rule; and even the rules can change based on prevailing policy measures and market conditions.
The key takeaway then, is to avoid letting collective results prejudice you against a specific project or unit. Even if what you see is older, and even if it doesn’t have freehold status, that doesn’t mean it should immediately be struck off the list. Likewise, a newer freehold unit doesn’t always justify its price point. Make your decision based on localised, specific observations and numbers – not just on wider market movements.
For more on-the-ground observations and reviews (old and new condos alike), follow us on Stacked. If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so here.
*And even if we did make a collective comparison, it isn’t true that freehold will always come out ahead.
Kudos on your informative, well researched and well analyzed article. Unlike the fluff pieces nowadays (including in the mainstream media), I came away feeling informed and inspired. I do not feel I wasted my 10 mins.
One like wish though – for the nerd in me, it would be lovely if your data table could explain what each row was. E.g. if I don’t know what “cvy fee” is, I’d love to tap on that cell and see a little tooltip or something that explains what it is.
All the best!
Hey Arul, that’s a great point! We should’ve not put abbreviations in there to make it more readable and understandable. Apologies for this!