Should You Pay For A Buyer Agent?


A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
You know those guides that say you should bang pots and pans, to scare off a bear?
Or that you should talk calmly to an armed kidnapper to humanise yourself?
Those are the kinds of solutions only someone in my current position – safely hammering away on a keyboard in my room – would present. I refuse to believe that many people would attempt that in the actual scenarios. And this is, I think, one of the issues the Singapore Estate Agents Association (SEAA) faces with their recent pact.
SEAA has signed guidelines with a lot of property agents, asking for buyers’ agents to collect service fees from their clients. This goes against the established norm, where in most cases, it’s the seller who pays the commission for both (i.e., there’s a two per cent commission on the sale of the property, of which the buyer and seller’s agents both get one per cent). This is negotiable, but only in the same way most United Nations crises are: a low chance of success, coupled with nobody being very happy.
And to no one’s surprise, it was recently revealed that the real world take up was “tepid”.
Now the intentions are definitely good. If everyone was willing to pay for their own buyer’s agent, property transactions would actually be easier on all of us. Sellers’ agents wouldn’t have to ghost other potential agents, and there would be less impulse to engage in certain shenanigans.
The problem is exactly the same as the aforementioned bear attack scenario. Sure, a property agent might understand how – industry wide and in an abstract sense – asking a buyer for money makes sense. But in reality, very few want to be the ones to try it.
It doesn’t matter if you explain that oh in the end the costs even out as the seller has to pay lower commissions, which can be factored into the pricing etc. That doesn’t matter in the face of FREE, which causes the human brain to immediately ignore the numbers and divide everything into: Free/Not free.
Besides, how are they going to do it, unless there’s a guarantee everyone else is guaranteed to stick to the guidelines? If Agent A wants to charge their buyer, and Agent B doesn’t, then Agent A will soon be looking for a change of career.
I understand that, by using guidelines, it’s possible for the industry to try and self-regulate before the authorities step in.
And maybe because it’s an organisation of professional salespeople, they’re confident they can sell any idea, even to other salespeople. But this is a classic collective action problem: even if it would be good for the property market as a whole, it’s nigh impossible to find the momentum needed for what is, essentially, a simultaneous behavioural change across the entire industry. Because again, this doesn’t work if some agents won’t charge buyers, whilst others try to. It’s just too much of an edge to lose, in an already competitive business.
In the end, this may boil down to requiring government-level regulations, rather than guidelines or an honour system (see what is happening in the US).
Meanwhile in other property news:
- A new condo review is up! Check out 8@BT, a Bukit Timah condo which has some of the most efficient layouts we’ve seen.
- Condo units with private pools aren’t necessarily expensive, but they are hard to find. Here are some where you can have a quiet soak, sans screaming kids at the pool area.
- Not all the best located freehold properties are obvious, or super pricey. Here are the hidden gems in the central areas, which you’ve probably missed.
- 999-year lease homes, for $3.88 million or under, and also next to an MRT station. Need we say more? Check it out.
Weekly Sales Roundup (02 September – 08 September)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
KLIMT CAIRNHILL | $5,690,000 | 1496 | $3,803 | FH |
19 NASSIM | $5,321,000 | 1475 | $3,608 | 99 yrs (2019) |
TEMBUSU GRAND | $3,517,000 | 1432 | $2,457 | 99 yrs (2022) |
THE CONTINUUM | $3,384,000 | 1270 | $2,664 | FH |
GRANGE 1866 | $3,024,000 | 1012 | $2,989 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
KASSIA | $1,009,000 | 474 | $2,130 | FH |
SORA | $1,250,000 | 538 | $2,323 | 99 yrs (2023) |
PINETREE HILL | $1,353,000 | 538 | $2,514 | 99 yrs (2022) |
HILLHAVEN | $1,509,511 | 700 | $2,157 | 99 yrs (2023) |
LENTORIA | $1,562,000 | 732 | $2,134 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
LEEDON RESIDENCE | $5,880,000 | 2131 | $2,759 | FH |
REGENCY PARK | $5,125,000 | 2250 | $2,278 | FH |
THE DRAYCOTT | $5,000,000 | 2637 | $1,896 | FH |
NEWTON ONE | $4,608,000 | 1916 | $2,405 | FH |
THE SUITES AT CENTRAL | $4,310,000 | 1733 | $2,487 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
STRATUM | $680,000 | 452 | $1,504 | 99 yrs (2012) |
PALMERA EAST | $715,000 | 431 | $1,661 | FH |
D’NEST | $762,000 | 484 | $1,573 | 99 yrs (2010) |
NORTH PARK RESIDENCES | $818,900 | 431 | $1,902 | 99 yrs (2015) |
HILLION RESIDENCES | $820,000 | 474 | $1,731 | 99 yrs (2013) |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
REGENCY PARK | $5,125,000 | 2250 | $2,278 | $3,237,000 | 22 Years |
THE WINDSOR | $2,898,888 | 1798 | $1,613 | $1,548,888 | 14 Years |
CLOVER BY THE PARK | $2,480,000 | 1292 | $1,920 | $1,435,000 | 15 Years |
VARSITY PARK CONDOMINIUM | $2,720,000 | 1894 | $1,436 | $1,370,000 | 16 Years |
EAST VIEW | $2,180,000 | 1098 | $1,986 | $1,242,658 | 28 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
THE SCOTTS TOWER | $1,300,000 | 667 | $1,948 | -$916,416 | 13 Years |
THE PEAK @ CAIRNHILL I | $1,060,000 | 527 | $2,010 | -$340,000 | 13 Years |
26 NEWTON | $1,088,000 | 484 | $2,246 | -$86,129 | 8 Years |
URBAN VISTA | $1,170,000 | 797 | $1,469 | -$51,233 | 11 Years |
NYON | $1,900,000 | 915 | $2,077 | $1,000 | 5 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

For more on the Singapore property market, follow us on Stacked.
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Property News

Property News Can Singapore Property Prices Come Down In 2025?

Property News How Trump’s Tariffs Could Affect Singapore’s Condo And HDB Prices

Property News Are New Executive Condos Still For The “Sandwich Class” In Singapore?

Property News An Executive Condo Just Sold For $3.05m: Is This An Outlier Or A Sign Of Things To Come?
Latest Posts

Property Picks The Cheapest 2 And 3-Bedder Condos Within 1km Of Top Primary Schools—From Just $1 Million (Part 2)

Units Of The Week 5 Cheapest 5-Room HDB Flats Near An MRT From $609k

Homeowner Stories I Almost Sold My Home In Singapore—Here’s Why I’m Glad I Rented It Out Instead

Property Picks These Are The Cheapest 2 And 3-Bedder Condo Units Within 1km Of Popular Primary Schools (Part 1)

Editor's Pick The Worst Property I Ever Bought (And Why We’re Launching Paid Property Content)

Pro We Analysed 8 Years Of 1-Bedroom Condo Data In Central Singapore: Here’s What Investors Should Know

Pro Where You Can Buy A Resale 3-Bedder For The Price Of A New 2-Bedder In 2025

Pro Why 3-Bedders May Be The Smarter Investment (Over 2-Bedders) In 2025: Here’s The Breakdown

Pro Which Singapore Regions Offer The Best Value For Two-Bedder Condos Today? (Resale vs New Launch)

Property Market Commentary What DIY Property Buyers In Singapore Might Miss Out On (And Why It Matters)

Editor's Pick Why This Singapore Homeowner Wakes At 5AM To Commute – And Has Zero Regrets

Editor's Pick Touring Rare Freehold Conservation Shophouses In Cairnhill (From $7 Million)

Editor's Pick “We Treated Our Flat As A Liability” How One Couple Paid Off Their HDB In 15 Years

Editor's Pick Condo Profits Averaged $270K In 2024 Sub Sales: Could This Grow In 2025?

Property Market Commentary Slower Sales At One Marina Gardens And Bloomsbury Residences: A Sign That Buyer Sentiment Is Cooling?
