Why Singapore Landlords Hold All The Power

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
For the most part, landlords have a strong advantage over tenants in Singapore.
We have no formal rent control measures (at least not since 2001*), there is no specific tenancy resolution body (everything goes to the Small Claims Tribunal or SCT), and nearly everything comes down to a private contract.
So I’m always surprised when I hear of tenants making a successful claim against a landlord, as it seems like a tough thing to do. But whenever I do hear of this, it usually involves the security deposit. You’ve probably heard the story before: at the end of the lease, the landlord deducts all sorts of questionable “damages” from the deposit—sometimes to the point of returning practically nothing (or literally nothing).
In cases where tenants have successfully claimed their deposit back through the SCT, I’ve noticed the following patterns:
- Their landlord attempted to make deductions for wear and tear. Tenants aren’t liable for this. Some things that landlords claim as “damages”—such as sliding doors that no longer close properly or peeling laminate on countertops—can often be argued to fall under fair wear and tear.
- If they planned to withhold the final month’s rent (suspecting the landlord was up to something unfair), they usually did so with legal advice first. Just so you know, the usual advice is not to do this, as it could allow the landlord to sue them for breach of contract. However, in some cases, the landlord may not find it worth the effort, depending on the amount involved.
- A lawyer’s letter was sent first, or very early in the process. I don’t know if there’s a direct correlation, but among the successful tenants I’ve encountered, many started by sending a legal letter. Sometimes it was their very first response. I suspect this signals to the landlord that they’re not ignorant of their rights or easily taken advantage of—though, of course, this does incur some cost.
- Photos, photos, photos. Inexperienced or first-time tenants often sleepwalk through the inventory checklist, and unless they have a good agent taking photos for them, they usually don’t document the condition of the property. I’ve seen cases where landlords have even tried to claim for items actually purchased by the tenant—such as saying they bought a replacement desk or mattress when, in fact, the tenant did.
I’d recommend emailing photos of pre-existing damages to the landlord, agent, or both. This makes them easy to retrieve later, with a timestamp as proof.
More from Stacked
Can Resale Condos Maintain Their Momentum For The Rest Of 2021?
First-time buyers and upgraders were hit by more bad news, for end-June 2021. It was expected that a return to…
That said, landlords do have a strong advantage in Singapore, perhaps because of our high homeownership rate (around 90 per cent). In places where a larger proportion of the population rents—often for most or all of their lives—tenant protections tend to be stronger.
But as we’ve never been in that situation, the system in Singapore seems unlikely to change.
If I had to rent, though, I would lean towards unfurnished properties. They may be pricier, but at least everything in the house would be mine—and I wouldn’t have to waste weeks arguing with the landlord over whether a chipped side table is worth $1,000.
*Control of Rent (Abolition) Act 2001. So yes, Singapore did have rent control a long time ago.
Meanwhile in other property news…
- You may have heard a common bit of advice that, if you’re going to buy a one-bedder for investment, you should buy the smallest one. We tested out the theory, comparing standard one-bedders to 1+Study units. See if it checks out.
- 3-bedroom condo units above 1,100 sq. ft., but prices from just $1.08 million. Do they exist? The answer is yes, and here’s where you can find them.
- CPF is seeing some changes in 2025, and here’s how that might affect your home-buying decision.
- Is it really worth paying the ABSD, just so you can retain your old flat when you buy a condo? Here’s a look at some of the reasons.
Weekly Sales Roundup (27 January – 02 February)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
NAVA GROVE | $4,387,800 | 1722 | $2,548 | 99 yrs (2024) |
THE ORIE | $4,005,000 | 1453 | $2,756 | 99 yrs (2024) |
PINETREE HILL | $3,864,000 | 1464 | $2,640 | 99 yrs (2022) |
BAGNALL HAUS | $3,688,000 | 1528 | $2,413 | FH |
J’DEN | $3,626,000 | 1485 | $2,441 | 99 years |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
GEMS VILLE | $1,198,000 | 517 | $2,319 | FH |
BAGNALL HAUS | $1,304,000 | 495 | $2,634 | FH |
SORA | $1,544,000 | 732 | $2,109 | 99 yrs (2023) |
UNION SQUARE RESIDENCES | $1,631,000 | 506 | $3,224 | 99 yrs (2024) |
ONE BERNAM | $1,765,000 | 700 | $2,523 | 99 yrs (2019) |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ORCHARD VIEW | $7,000,000 | 2530 | $2,767 | FH |
CAIRNHILL CREST | $4,120,000 | 1733 | $2,377 | FH |
VIVA | $3,980,000 | 1518 | $2,622 | FH |
11 AMBER ROAD | $3,680,000 | 1507 | $2,442 | FH |
DUCHESS CREST | $3,285,000 | 1711 | $1,919 | 99 yrs (1995) |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
RIVERSAILS | $722,000 | 506 | $1,427 | 99 yrs (2011) |
RIVERFRONT RESIDENCES | $762,500 | 463 | $1,647 | 99 yrs (2018) |
HILLSTA | $880,000 | 624 | $1,410 | 99 yrs (2011) |
THE TRILINQ | $938,000 | 538 | $1,743 | 99 yrs (2012) |
THE PARC CONDOMINIUM | $1,030,000 | 667 | $1,543 | FH |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
RIVIERA RESIDENCES | $2,550,000 | 1216 | $2,096 | $1,711,000 | 20 Years |
DUCHESS CREST | $3,285,000 | 1711 | $1,919 | $1,642,446 | 18 Years |
MAPLE WOODS | $3,088,000 | 1464 | $2,109 | $1,588,000 | 14 Years |
THE LINCOLN RESIDENCES | $3,275,000 | 1410 | $2,323 | $1,487,000 | 16 Years |
TREVISTA | $3,068,000 | 1733 | $1,770 | $1,455,000 | 15 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
ORCHARD VIEW | $7,000,000 | 2530 | $2,767 | -$1,975,006 | 15 Years |
ONE BERNAM | $1,983,000 | 829 | $2,393 | -$586,000 | 2 Years |
THE TRILINQ | $938,000 | 538 | $1,743 | $109,000 | 8 Years |
THE PARC CONDOMINIUM | $1,030,000 | 667 | $1,543 | $110,000 | 12 Years |
PARC SOPHIA | $1,330,000 | 732 | $1,817 | $130,000 | 13 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

For more on the Singapore property market, follow us on Stacked!
Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News

Singapore Property News How Condo Buying In Singapore Became A Game Of Luck

Singapore Property News Is Your HDB or Condo at Risk of a Sinkhole? 5 Signs to Watch Out For

Singapore Property News This 3-Room Flat in Toa Payoh Just Sold for $920K — Here’s What The Seller Could Have Made

Singapore Property News Would You Still Pay More For A Private Condo, If The EC Next Door Looked The Same?
Latest Posts

Landed Home Tours I Visited Third & Fourth Street: The One Annoying Downside Despite Good Location And Bigger Houses

New Launch Condo Analysis Springleaf Residence Launches From $878K — Is This 941-Unit Mega Development Worth It?

On The Market 5 Spacious 3-Bedroom Condos That Cost Less Than You’d Expect (Under $2M)

New Launch Condo Analysis Canberra Crescent Residences Pricing Breakdown: A Price Comparison With Nearby Condos

Property Market Commentary 10 Most Affordable New Launch Condos Under $1.5 Million—Some Are Surprisingly Central

Editor's Pick Why I Might Still Pay $1 Million For A 50-Year-Old HDB—Even If Everyone Says It’s A Bad Buy

Editor's Pick A New River Valley Condo From Just $1.2M? Here’s What You Need To Know About River Green’s Pricing

Property Market Commentary Singapore’s Most Expensive Neighbourhoods Are Changing—4 Buyer Trends That Prove It In 2025

Property Market Commentary URA 2025 Draft Master Plan: 6 Under The Radar Changes You May Have Missed

Editor's Pick We Found Freehold Landed Homes From $4 Million In The East—But Would You Live Here?

Overseas Property Investing Why I Bought 7 Properties in Johor Bahru, and Will Still Buy More

Editor's Pick River Green Condo Review: Attractive Entry Price To River Valley From $1.2m

On The Market 5 Spacious Cluster Landed Homes That Cost Less Than You’d Expect (From $2.79M)

Pro Why The Interlace Condo Underperformed—Despite Its Massive Land Size And Large Units

On The Market Spacious 4-Bedroom In Orchard Is On The Market For $6.3M – With a Rare Standout Feature
