So Is The 99-1 Property Split Strategy Legal Or Not?

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Most people assume it is, since it’s something that’s been going on for over a decade.
The idea is that one co-owner (most often a spouse) owns 99 per cent of the property, whilst another owns just one per cent.
Later, when the funds exist for each one to own a separate property, the owner of the one per cent transfers it to her spouse, thus incurring Buyers Stamp Duty on just the one per cent. She’s then free to buy a property without incurring Additional Buyers Stamp Duty (ABSD), since she has a property count of zero.
For the longest time, this has been the basis of the “sell one, buy two” strategy. But there was an interesting case of late that shed light on an unasked question: is there any illegality involved here?
Here’s the case in question:

A couple bought a Hillcrest Arcadia condo in a 99:1 ownership split. One spouse claimed she owned 99 per cent of the $1.865 million unit, because – well, that’s what the title said. It was a sweet gesture from her then-boyfriend to soothe her fears of infidelity. Would he do something like that if he were intending to cheat? Of course not, he’d lose his home.
(And, ahem, there’s the added side benefit of buying a second home without ABSD if the chance comes.)
But love is eternal for as long as it lasts. So when the couple split less than a year later, she declared the whole 99 per cent to be hers, since that’s what it said on paper.
But two things happened:
First, the High Court wasn’t having it: since her boyfriend bankrolled most of the purchase, the judge ruled he actually owned 54 per cent, based on the paper trail of payments; so her 99 per cent claim was a no-go (Moral of the story: you can fake your relationship on paper, but not your CPF contributions.)
Second, this interesting bit from the case:
“The pair admitted that they planned for Mr Ngor to transfer and pay taxes on his one per cent share to Ms Wong when they decide to buy a second property. Justice Lee said there was no nefarious intention or knowledge that this would be an unlawful act. Moreover, the plan was never carried out.”
The important turn of phrase here is “would be an unlawful act.” This would suggest that, whilst the Court didn’t punish them – partly because the plan was never executed – it wasn’t okay for them to plan to dodge the ABSD.
Here’s something from a parliamentary response to take note of:
“Whether a ‘99-to-1’ arrangement involves tax avoidance depends on the facts and circumstances surrounding the specific case. Should IRAS determine that tax avoidance has occurred, it will recover the rightful amount of stamp duty from the buyers, and may impose a 50 per cent surcharge on the additional stamp duty payable. There is no statutory time limit for stamp duty audits.”
More from Stacked
6 Ways Covid-19 Construction Delays Can Impact Property Buying Decisions
Covid-19 has resulted in further delays to housing projects in Singapore. To date, about 43,000 homes will face delays of…
That would suggest holding a property in a 99-1 tenancy-in-common split is not per se illegal under Singapore law. But, and this is a big “but,” authorities can treat any contrived use of that structure as tax avoidance.
But I wonder how clearly all of this is communicated to us
I’ve spoken to more than a few people who said their property agent or lawyer assured them it was perfectly fine – no risks, no problem. And then they get an audit letter a year later and realise they’ve been sold half a story.
Maybe it’s time we stop giving buyers unrealistic expectations and sending them into legal grey areas. If someone is going to recommend 99-1 as a strategy, then they’d better spell out the risks; not just the headline savings. And if they provided any kind of guarantees they shouldn’t, well, they should shoulder more of the responsibility when the reckoning comes.
This is especially true in 2025 when property prices are higher, and penalties hit harder.
Meanwhile, in other property news:
- There are plenty of factors to consider when buying a property, but what are the most important? Here’s a look at what to prioritise.
- Subletting is hardly a new idea; and for some it can be a great way to secure a much desired location. But it carries hidden risks that you need to brace for.
- The former Robertson Walk is back, but now as Robertson Opus. Is this 999-year project worth considering?
- District 7 now has one of the biggest price gaps between new and resale condos; join our Stacked Pro readers in finding whether resale is simply the wiser choice here.
For more on the Singapore property market as it unfolds, follow us on Stacked.
Weekly Sales Roundup (23 June – 29 June)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
CANNINGHILL PIERS | $5,656,000 | 1959 | $2,887 | 99 yrs (2021) |
GRAND DUNMAN | $4,395,000 | 1690 | $2,601 | 99 yrs |
NAVA GROVE | $3,949,100 | 1550 | $2,548 | 99 yrs |
THE ORIE | $3,862,000 | 1453 | $2,658 | 99 yrs |
AMBER HOUSE | $3,780,035 | 1238 | $3,054 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ONE MARINA GARDENS | $1,231,686 | 420 | $2,934 | 99 yrs |
NOVO PLACE | $1,383,000 | 872 | $1,586 | 99 yrs |
AURELLE OF TAMPINES | $1,526,000 | 840 | $1,818 | 99 yrs |
THE CONTINUUM | $1,544,000 | 560 | $2,758 | FH |
TEMBUSU GRAND | $1,554,000 | 646 | $2,406 | 99 yrs |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
SCULPTURA ARDMORE | $20,000,000 | 3326 | $6,013 | FH |
RIVERGATE | $6,188,000 | 2088 | $2,963 | FH |
WARNER COURT | $4,880,000 | 4176 | $1,168 | FH |
TANGLIN PARK | $3,800,000 | 1507 | $2,522 | FH |
THE GLYNDEBOURNE | $3,750,000 | 1927 | $1,946 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
PARC ROSEWOOD | $650,000 | 431 | $1,510 | 99 yrs (2011) |
THE NAUTICAL | $674,000 | 441 | $1,527 | 99 yrs (2011) |
PRESTO@UPPER SERANGOON | $725,000 | 420 | $1,727 | FH |
THE COTZ | $738,000 | 452 | $1,632 | FH |
MIDTOWN RESIDENCES | $746,000 | 484 | $1,540 | 99 yrs (2013) |
Top 5 Biggest Winners

Top 5 Biggest Losers

Transaction Breakdown

Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News

Singapore Property News Why July 2025 Could Be the Best Time Yet for Singles and Second-Timers to Apply for a BTO

Singapore Property News SERS: Singapore’s $94,000 Housing Lottery Or A Bad Bet?

Singapore Property News Clementi 4-Room HDB Sold For Record $1.28 Million – Here’s What Makes It So Special

Singapore Property News The Trick to Seeing Through a Condo Showflat (Most Buyers Never Do This)
Latest Posts

New Launch Condo Reviews River Green Condo Review: Attractive Entry Price To River Valley From $1.2m

On The Market 5 Spacious Cluster Landed Homes That Cost Less Than You’d Expect (From $2.79M)

Pro Why The Interlace Condo Underperformed—Despite Its Massive Land Size And Large Units

On The Market Spacious 4-Bedroom In Orchard Is On The Market For $6.3M – With a Rare Standout Feature

BTO Reviews July 2025 BTO Launch Review: Ultimate Guide To Choosing The Best Unit

New Launch Condo Analysis Promenade Peak Pricing Breakdown: How It Compares to Nearby Resale and New Launch Condos

Editor's Pick Promenade Peak Review: A 63-Storey Condo in River Valley from $2,680 Psf

Editor's Pick Is Great World Quietly Becoming the Place to Live in Central Singapore?

Landed Home Tours We Tour Freehold Landed Homes Within Walking Distance of Somerset MRT From $6 Million

Editor's Pick Canberra Crescent Residences Review: Affordable Family-Focused Condo Starting From $1,880 Psf

On The Market The 5 Biggest HDB Flats You Can Buy For About $1 Million Today

Pro 2 Reasons Costa Del Sol Underperformed—Despite Its Seafront Location And Family Appeal

Homeowner Stories I’ve Lived in Twin VEW for Four Years: What It’s Like Living Without an MRT Nearby

Editor's Pick The Surprising Truth Behind Singapore’s Longest Held Condos – And Why Residents Refuse To Sell After 20 Years

Pro 7 Reasons Reflections at Keppel Bay Underperformed—Despite Its Iconic Design and Prime Waterfront Location

There is a lot of mistakes in your Top 5 biggest loser.
U then loser
You then