So Is The 99-1 Property Split Strategy Legal Or Not?

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Most people assume it is, since it’s something that’s been going on for over a decade.
The idea is that one co-owner (most often a spouse) owns 99 per cent of the property, whilst another owns just one per cent.
Later, when the funds exist for each one to own a separate property, the owner of the one per cent transfers it to her spouse, thus incurring Buyers Stamp Duty on just the one per cent. She’s then free to buy a property without incurring Additional Buyers Stamp Duty (ABSD), since she has a property count of zero.
For the longest time, this has been the basis of the “sell one, buy two” strategy. But there was an interesting case of late that shed light on an unasked question: is there any illegality involved here?
Here’s the case in question:

A couple bought a Hillcrest Arcadia condo in a 99:1 ownership split. One spouse claimed she owned 99 per cent of the $1.865 million unit, because – well, that’s what the title said. It was a sweet gesture from her then-boyfriend to soothe her fears of infidelity. Would he do something like that if he were intending to cheat? Of course not, he’d lose his home.
(And, ahem, there’s the added side benefit of buying a second home without ABSD if the chance comes.)
But love is eternal for as long as it lasts. So when the couple split less than a year later, she declared the whole 99 per cent to be hers, since that’s what it said on paper.
But two things happened:
First, the High Court wasn’t having it: since her boyfriend bankrolled most of the purchase, the judge ruled he actually owned 54 per cent, based on the paper trail of payments; so her 99 per cent claim was a no-go (Moral of the story: you can fake your relationship on paper, but not your CPF contributions.)
Second, this interesting bit from the case:
“The pair admitted that they planned for Mr Ngor to transfer and pay taxes on his one per cent share to Ms Wong when they decide to buy a second property. Justice Lee said there was no nefarious intention or knowledge that this would be an unlawful act. Moreover, the plan was never carried out.”
The important turn of phrase here is “would be an unlawful act.” This would suggest that, whilst the Court didn’t punish them – partly because the plan was never executed – it wasn’t okay for them to plan to dodge the ABSD.
Here’s something from a parliamentary response to take note of:
“Whether a ‘99-to-1’ arrangement involves tax avoidance depends on the facts and circumstances surrounding the specific case. Should IRAS determine that tax avoidance has occurred, it will recover the rightful amount of stamp duty from the buyers, and may impose a 50 per cent surcharge on the additional stamp duty payable. There is no statutory time limit for stamp duty audits.”
More from Stacked
Budget 2022 Property Tax: How Much More It’ll Cost You + What It Means For The Market
In the recent budget 2022 announcement, the government said it would raise property taxes starting next year. While the increment…
That would suggest holding a property in a 99-1 tenancy-in-common split is not per se illegal under Singapore law. But, and this is a big “but,” authorities can treat any contrived use of that structure as tax avoidance.
But I wonder how clearly all of this is communicated to us
I’ve spoken to more than a few people who said their property agent or lawyer assured them it was perfectly fine – no risks, no problem. And then they get an audit letter a year later and realise they’ve been sold half a story.
Maybe it’s time we stop giving buyers unrealistic expectations and sending them into legal grey areas. If someone is going to recommend 99-1 as a strategy, then they’d better spell out the risks; not just the headline savings. And if they provided any kind of guarantees they shouldn’t, well, they should shoulder more of the responsibility when the reckoning comes.
This is especially true in 2025 when property prices are higher, and penalties hit harder.
Meanwhile, in other property news:
- There are plenty of factors to consider when buying a property, but what are the most important? Here’s a look at what to prioritise.
- Subletting is hardly a new idea; and for some it can be a great way to secure a much desired location. But it carries hidden risks that you need to brace for.
- The former Robertson Walk is back, but now as Robertson Opus. Is this 999-year project worth considering?
- District 7 now has one of the biggest price gaps between new and resale condos; join our Stacked Pro readers in finding whether resale is simply the wiser choice here.
For more on the Singapore property market as it unfolds, follow us on Stacked.
Weekly Sales Roundup (23 June – 29 June)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
CANNINGHILL PIERS | $5,656,000 | 1959 | $2,887 | 99 yrs (2021) |
GRAND DUNMAN | $4,395,000 | 1690 | $2,601 | 99 yrs |
NAVA GROVE | $3,949,100 | 1550 | $2,548 | 99 yrs |
THE ORIE | $3,862,000 | 1453 | $2,658 | 99 yrs |
AMBER HOUSE | $3,780,035 | 1238 | $3,054 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ONE MARINA GARDENS | $1,231,686 | 420 | $2,934 | 99 yrs |
NOVO PLACE | $1,383,000 | 872 | $1,586 | 99 yrs |
AURELLE OF TAMPINES | $1,526,000 | 840 | $1,818 | 99 yrs |
THE CONTINUUM | $1,544,000 | 560 | $2,758 | FH |
TEMBUSU GRAND | $1,554,000 | 646 | $2,406 | 99 yrs |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
SCULPTURA ARDMORE | $20,000,000 | 3326 | $6,013 | FH |
RIVERGATE | $6,188,000 | 2088 | $2,963 | FH |
WARNER COURT | $4,880,000 | 4176 | $1,168 | FH |
TANGLIN PARK | $3,800,000 | 1507 | $2,522 | FH |
THE GLYNDEBOURNE | $3,750,000 | 1927 | $1,946 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
PARC ROSEWOOD | $650,000 | 431 | $1,510 | 99 yrs (2011) |
THE NAUTICAL | $674,000 | 441 | $1,527 | 99 yrs (2011) |
PRESTO@UPPER SERANGOON | $725,000 | 420 | $1,727 | FH |
THE COTZ | $738,000 | 452 | $1,632 | FH |
MIDTOWN RESIDENCES | $746,000 | 484 | $1,540 | 99 yrs (2013) |
Top 5 Biggest Winners

Top 5 Biggest Losers

Transaction Breakdown

Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Singapore Property News

Singapore Property News Higher 2025 Seller’s Stamp Duty Rates Just Dropped: Should Buyers And Sellers Be Worried?

Singapore Property News They Paid Rent On Time—And Still Got Evicted. Here’s The Messy Truth About Subletting In Singapore.

Singapore Property News Is Our Housing Policy Secretly Singapore’s Most Effective Birth Control?

Singapore Property News URA’s 2025 Draft Master Plan: 80,000 New Homes Across 10 Estates — Here’s What To Look Out For
Latest Posts

Landed Home Tours Where $4 Million Semi-Ds Sit Next To $40 Million GCBs: Touring First Avenue In Bukit Timah

New Launch Condo Reviews Transforming A Dual-Key Into A Family-Friendly 4-Bedder: We Revisit Nava Grove’s New Layout

On The Market 5 Cheapest HDB Flats Near MRT Stations Under $500,000

New Launch Condo Reviews The Robertson Opus Review: A Rare 999-Year New Launch Condo Priced From $1.37m

Pro Same Location, But Over $700k Cheaper: We Compare New Launch Vs Resale Condos In District 7

Property Trends Why Upgrading From An HDB Is Harder (And Riskier) Than It Was Since Covid

Property Market Commentary A First-Time Condo Buyer’s Guide To Evaluating Property Developers In Singapore

New Launch Condo Analysis This Rare 999-Year New Launch Condo Is The Redevelopment Of Robertson Walk. Is Robertson Opus Worth A Look?

Pro We Compared New Vs Resale Condo Prices In District 10—Here’s Why New 2-Bedders Now Cost Over $600K More

New Launch Condo Reviews LyndenWoods Condo Review: 343 Units, 3 Pools, And A Pickleball Court From $1.39m

Landed Home Tours We Tour Affordable Freehold Landed Homes In Balestier From $3.4m (From Jalan Ampas To Boon Teck Road)

Property Market Commentary Why More Young Families Are Moving to Pasir Ris (Hint: It’s Not Just About the New EC)

On The Market A 10,000 Sq Ft Freehold Landed Home In The East Is On The Market For $10.8M: Here’s A Closer Look

On The Market 5 Spacious Old But Freehold Condos Above 2,650 Sqft

Property Investment Insights We Compared New Launch And Resale Condo Prices Across Districts—Here’s Where The Price Gaps Are The Biggest
