Now That GE2025 Is Over, Let’s Talk About The Housing Proposals That Didn’t Get Enough Scrutiny

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Our alternative housing proposals are missing a few steps.
I’m talking about the election, and the proposals from different parties that are going around. Some of these are quite surprising to me. Case in point: the proposal to make every housing estate eligible for the Selective En Bloc Redevelopment Scheme (SERS).
SERS is a very expensive programme, which involves not only buying back the flat, but also providing a replacement unit with a fresh lease; and this doesn’t count other forms of support and compensation. To stretch something intended for just five per cent of estates to 100 per cent would be enormous (not to mention kick resale prices into overdrive, since lease decay would become virtually meaningless).
There are also a lot of policies that involve excluding land costs. I am aware of the argument that, because HDB really just pays SLA for the land, it might be fair to exclude this cost for buyers. (Take from one pocket, put into the other, as the coffee shop uncles complain.)
One of these proposals suggests that the land costs be paid only when the owner chooses to sell it on the secondary market. But that’s still a hit to government coffers, as the money for the land comes much later (if at all), and in the meantime, we’re denied funds that could be going toward education, healthcare, upgrading older estates, etc.
I’m not deriding the alternative ideas, mind you; I even like some of them in concept. What nags me is the incomplete nature of the proposals. Some are built on the assumption that we have a nigh-infinite mountain of wealth, which will fund all of these programmes with no trade-offs.
But our coffers, sizeable though they are, are meant to support essentials like healthcare, education, and infrastructure, not just subsidise nicer flats for everyone. Healthcare in our rapidly ageing society is a valid one (unlike our obsession with covered walkways – enough already.) We also need to consider other issues, such as with a low birth rate, a time will come when many flats will be vacant and passed down; so, rampant overbuilding leads to problems later.
So while these new ideas on housing are great, I do wish they came with instructions attached so to speak – detailed explanations of not just the policy, but on how we’ll pay for them, how we can roll them out, and what we’re giving up in exchange for it (because it’s never free.)
I still think we need to talk about the normalisation of dual-income families, in light of all this
More from Stacked
How Will CPF Changes In 2025 Affect Your Housing Decisions In Singapore?
Several changes to the Central Provident Fund (CPF) have taken effect from 2025, prompting questions about their impact on housing…

Some of you may have heard this rant before, so I’ll keep it short. I think we really need to look at single-wage-to-home-costs. We’ve transitioned from a time when sole breadwinners could afford a flat with relative ease to a situation where dual-income is almost expected. The majority of homeowners I talk to now tell me that, if they or their spouse were to stop working, they’d need to downgrade.
If we’re going to talk about affordable housing, we can start by looking more deeply into this. If our wages have “kept up” with home prices solely because we normalised dual-income families, the affordability may be a little less than the numbers suggest.
So, as a parting thought on this: do I believe housing is affordable in Singapore? For the most part, yes. Do I believe housing is becoming less affordable? Also yes.
The two beliefs are not mutually exclusive.
Meanwhile in other property news…
- 2025 is rough, and housing options have narrowed a bit – but if you’re looking at your first home or getting worried about the cost, calm down. Here are some reasons it’s not as bad as it seems.
- Buying six to 12 months earlier can sometimes translate to around a 150 per cent difference in gains. That’s from actual data found in a mega-development (Treasure at Tampines), so check out the case study.
- I love walk-ups too, but don’t ignore the shops downstairs. They can shape future demand – or sometimes just add way too much noise.
- Do one-bedder condos really perform better in prime areas, as the old saying suggests? We took a deep dive into eight years’ worth of transactions, to find the answer.
Weekly Sales Roundup (21 April – 27 April)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
21 ANDERSON | $21,593,170 | 4489 | $4,811 | FH |
PINETREE HILL | $3,987,000 | 1464 | $2,724 | 99 yrs (2022) |
ARDOR RESIDENCE | $3,809,520 | 1518 | $2,510 | FH |
THE ORIE | $3,758,000 | 1453 | $2,586 | 99 yrs (2024) |
BLOSSOMS BY THE PARK | $3,730,000 | 1507 | $2,475 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ONE MARINA GARDENS | $1,251,638 | 431 | $2,907 | 99 years |
LUMINA GRAND | $1,422,000 | 936 | $1,518 | 99 yrs (2022) |
NOVO PLACE | $1,484,000 | 883 | $1,681 | 99 years |
BLOOMSBURY RESIDENCES | $1,552,000 | 646 | $2,403 | 99 years |
LENTOR CENTRAL RESIDENCES | $1,693,000 | 678 | $2,497 | 99 yrs (2023) |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
FOUR SEASONS PARK | $9,800,000 | 2874 | $3,410 | FH |
THE WHARF RESIDENCE | $8,500,000 | 4446 | $1,912 | 999 yrs (1841) |
CUSCADEN RESERVE | $6,890,000 | 2099 | $3,283 | 99 yrs (2018) |
BEAVERTON COURT | $5,950,000 | 3122 | $1,906 | FH |
THE GRANGE | $5,000,000 | 1765 | $2,832 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ISUITES @ MARSHALL | $712,800 | 355 | $2,007 | FH |
SMART SUITES | $716,888 | 452 | $1,586 | FH |
CENTRAL IMPERIAL | $718,000 | 549 | $1,308 | FH |
SOL ACRES | $735,000 | 495 | $1,484 | 99 yrs (2014) |
JOOL SUITES | $750,000 | 409 | $1,834 | FH |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
21 ANDERSON | $21,593,170 | 4489 | $4,811 | $19,041,170 | 18 Years |
BOTANIC GARDENS VIEW | $3,140,000 | 1259 | $2,493 | $2,160,000 | 26 Years |
ONE AMBER | $3,320,000 | 1453 | $2,285 | $2,115,930 | 16 Years |
WINDY HEIGHTS | $3,158,000 | 2476 | $1,276 | $1,988,000 | 28 Years |
THE WATERINA | $2,700,000 | 1335 | $2,023 | $1,960,000 | 20 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
UP@ROBERTSON QUAY | $985,000 | 463 | $2,128 | -$298,000 | 12 Years |
ONE SHENTON | $2,880,000 | 1593 | $1,808 | -$146,700 | 11 Years |
1919 | $1,190,000 | 635 | $1,874 | -$125,000 | 7 Years |
THE SAIL @ MARINA BAY | $1,708,000 | 883 | $1,935 | -$58,000 | 18 Years |
PINETREE HILL | $3,987,000 | 1464 | $2,724 | $0 | 0 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Editor's Pick

Property Investment Insights Why Kingsford Hillview Peak Underperformed—Despite Its MRT Location And “Good” Entry Price

Overseas Property Investing Buying Property In Malaysia As A Singaporean: 6 Key Restrictions To Be Aware Of

Property Advice Why Punggol Northshore Could Be The Next Hotspot In The HDB Resale Market

Singapore Property News 9,800 New Homes Across 11 GLS Sites In 2H 2025: What To Know About Tanjong Rhu, Dover, And Bedok
Latest Posts

Property Market Commentary Which Central Singapore Condos Still Offer Long-Term Value? Here Are My Picks

On The Market 5 Cheapest Newly MOP 5 Room HDB Flats From $700k

Pro Why Rivergate Outperformed Its District 9 Rivals—Despite Being Nearly 20 Years Old

On The Market Springleaf Vs Faber Walk: Which Future GLS Residential Site Has More Potential?

Property Market Commentary I Reviewed HDB’s 2 And 3-Room Show Flats: Ideal For First-Time Buyers Or Too Small To Live In?

Homeowner Stories “If We Sell, We’ll Never Have A Home This Big Again”: What Singaporean Parents Do After The Kids Move Out

Property Advice How Much Is Your Home Really Worth? How Property Valuations Work in Singapore

Property Investment Insights Singapore Property Data Is Transparent: But Here’s Why It Can Still Mislead You

On The Market 5 Cheapest Convenient 1-Bedders Near Integrated Developments From $800k

Property Advice Why I Had Second Thoughts After Buying My Dream Home In Singapore

Pro Why This 40-Year-Old Leasehold Condo Beat Newer Developments: A Case Study Of Loyang Valley

Property Market Commentary I Reviewed HDB’s Showroom For 4 And 5-Room Flats. Here’s What Future Homeowners Should Know

Pro Can 30+ Year-Old Leasehold Condos Still Perform? The Arcadia’s Surprising Case Study

On The Market 5 Lesser-Known Freehold 3-Bedroom Units Priced Under $2 Million

Property Market Commentary The Biggest Misconceptions About Buying Property In Singapore’s CCR In 2025
