Now That GE2025 Is Over, Let’s Talk About The Housing Proposals That Didn’t Get Enough Scrutiny


A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Our alternative housing proposals are missing a few steps.
I’m talking about the election, and the proposals from different parties that are going around. Some of these are quite surprising to me. Case in point: the proposal to make every housing estate eligible for the Selective En Bloc Redevelopment Scheme (SERS).
SERS is a very expensive programme, which involves not only buying back the flat, but also providing a replacement unit with a fresh lease; and this doesn’t count other forms of support and compensation. To stretch something intended for just five per cent of estates to 100 per cent would be enormous (not to mention kick resale prices into overdrive, since lease decay would become virtually meaningless).
There are also a lot of policies that involve excluding land costs. I am aware of the argument that, because HDB really just pays SLA for the land, it might be fair to exclude this cost for buyers. (Take from one pocket, put into the other, as the coffee shop uncles complain.)
One of these proposals suggests that the land costs be paid only when the owner chooses to sell it on the secondary market. But that’s still a hit to government coffers, as the money for the land comes much later (if at all), and in the meantime, we’re denied funds that could be going toward education, healthcare, upgrading older estates, etc.
I’m not deriding the alternative ideas, mind you; I even like some of them in concept. What nags me is the incomplete nature of the proposals. Some are built on the assumption that we have a nigh-infinite mountain of wealth, which will fund all of these programmes with no trade-offs.
But our coffers, sizeable though they are, are meant to support essentials like healthcare, education, and infrastructure, not just subsidise nicer flats for everyone. Healthcare in our rapidly ageing society is a valid one (unlike our obsession with covered walkways – enough already.) We also need to consider other issues, such as with a low birth rate, a time will come when many flats will be vacant and passed down; so, rampant overbuilding leads to problems later.
So while these new ideas on housing are great, I do wish they came with instructions attached so to speak – detailed explanations of not just the policy, but on how we’ll pay for them, how we can roll them out, and what we’re giving up in exchange for it (because it’s never free.)
I still think we need to talk about the normalisation of dual-income families, in light of all this
More from Stacked
How Will CPF Changes In 2025 Affect Your Housing Decisions In Singapore?
Several changes to the Central Provident Fund (CPF) have taken effect from 2025, prompting questions about their impact on housing…

Some of you may have heard this rant before, so I’ll keep it short. I think we really need to look at single-wage-to-home-costs. We’ve transitioned from a time when sole breadwinners could afford a flat with relative ease to a situation where dual-income is almost expected. The majority of homeowners I talk to now tell me that, if they or their spouse were to stop working, they’d need to downgrade.
If we’re going to talk about affordable housing, we can start by looking more deeply into this. If our wages have “kept up” with home prices solely because we normalised dual-income families, the affordability may be a little less than the numbers suggest.
So, as a parting thought on this: do I believe housing is affordable in Singapore? For the most part, yes. Do I believe housing is becoming less affordable? Also yes.
The two beliefs are not mutually exclusive.
Meanwhile in other property news…
- 2025 is rough, and housing options have narrowed a bit – but if you’re looking at your first home or getting worried about the cost, calm down. Here are some reasons it’s not as bad as it seems.
- Buying six to 12 months earlier can sometimes translate to around a 150 per cent difference in gains. That’s from actual data found in a mega-development (Treasure at Tampines), so check out the case study.
- I love walk-ups too, but don’t ignore the shops downstairs. They can shape future demand – or sometimes just add way too much noise.
- Do one-bedder condos really perform better in prime areas, as the old saying suggests? We took a deep dive into eight years’ worth of transactions, to find the answer.
Weekly Sales Roundup (21 April – 27 April)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
21 ANDERSON | $21,593,170 | 4489 | $4,811 | FH |
PINETREE HILL | $3,987,000 | 1464 | $2,724 | 99 yrs (2022) |
ARDOR RESIDENCE | $3,809,520 | 1518 | $2,510 | FH |
THE ORIE | $3,758,000 | 1453 | $2,586 | 99 yrs (2024) |
BLOSSOMS BY THE PARK | $3,730,000 | 1507 | $2,475 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ONE MARINA GARDENS | $1,251,638 | 431 | $2,907 | 99 years |
LUMINA GRAND | $1,422,000 | 936 | $1,518 | 99 yrs (2022) |
NOVO PLACE | $1,484,000 | 883 | $1,681 | 99 years |
BLOOMSBURY RESIDENCES | $1,552,000 | 646 | $2,403 | 99 years |
LENTOR CENTRAL RESIDENCES | $1,693,000 | 678 | $2,497 | 99 yrs (2023) |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
FOUR SEASONS PARK | $9,800,000 | 2874 | $3,410 | FH |
THE WHARF RESIDENCE | $8,500,000 | 4446 | $1,912 | 999 yrs (1841) |
CUSCADEN RESERVE | $6,890,000 | 2099 | $3,283 | 99 yrs (2018) |
BEAVERTON COURT | $5,950,000 | 3122 | $1,906 | FH |
THE GRANGE | $5,000,000 | 1765 | $2,832 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ISUITES @ MARSHALL | $712,800 | 355 | $2,007 | FH |
SMART SUITES | $716,888 | 452 | $1,586 | FH |
CENTRAL IMPERIAL | $718,000 | 549 | $1,308 | FH |
SOL ACRES | $735,000 | 495 | $1,484 | 99 yrs (2014) |
JOOL SUITES | $750,000 | 409 | $1,834 | FH |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
21 ANDERSON | $21,593,170 | 4489 | $4,811 | $19,041,170 | 18 Years |
BOTANIC GARDENS VIEW | $3,140,000 | 1259 | $2,493 | $2,160,000 | 26 Years |
ONE AMBER | $3,320,000 | 1453 | $2,285 | $2,115,930 | 16 Years |
WINDY HEIGHTS | $3,158,000 | 2476 | $1,276 | $1,988,000 | 28 Years |
THE WATERINA | $2,700,000 | 1335 | $2,023 | $1,960,000 | 20 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
UP@ROBERTSON QUAY | $985,000 | 463 | $2,128 | -$298,000 | 12 Years |
ONE SHENTON | $2,880,000 | 1593 | $1,808 | -$146,700 | 11 Years |
1919 | $1,190,000 | 635 | $1,874 | -$125,000 | 7 Years |
THE SAIL @ MARINA BAY | $1,708,000 | 883 | $1,935 | -$58,000 | 18 Years |
PINETREE HILL | $3,987,000 | 1464 | $2,724 | $0 | 0 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Editor's Pick

Singapore Property News Rare Mixed-Use Site At Hougang MRT And New Sembawang EC Plot Just Launched: What You Need To Know

Singapore Property News $1.16M For A 4-Room HDB In Clementi? Why This Integrated Development Commands Premium Prices

New Launch Condo Reviews Arina East Residences Review: First Condo Launch in Tanjong Rhu in 13 Years, Near MRT Station

Property Market Commentary 4 Potential Residential En Bloc Sites That Could Be Worth Watching In 2025
Latest Posts

Overseas Property Investing I’m A Singaporean House-Hunting In Mexico City: Here’s What 2 Weeks On The Ground Taught Me

Homeowner Stories I’ve Lived In Braddell View For 14 Years: What It’s Like To Live In Singapore’s Largest Residential Site

Property Investment Insights Why Some 30-Year-Old Leasehold Condos Are Still Outperforming New Ones

Pro How Do Old Leasehold Condos Hold Up Against Newer Projects? A Case Study Of Orchid Park

On The Market 5 Cheapest 4 Room HDB Flats In Central Singapore (From $495K)

Homeowner Stories Why These Buyers Chose Older Leasehold Condos—And Have No Regrets

Pro Do Mega-Developments Really Outperform Regular Condos? A Parc Clematis Vs Clavon Case Study

Pro Affinity at Serangoon vs The Garden Residences: Same Launch Year, Same Location — But Which Gave Better Capital Gains?

Property Market Commentary Can Singapore’s Housing Market Handle A Rapidly Ageing Population?

Property Investment Insights Can You Upgrade From An HDB To A $1.8M Condo In 2025? Here’s What It Takes

Pro High Park Residences vs Parc Botannia: A Data-Driven Look At Mega vs Mid-Sized Condo Performance

Property Investment Insights Are Mega Developments In Singapore More Profitable Than Regular Condos? Here’s What The Data Shows

On The Market 5 Cheapest 5-Room HDB Flats In Central Singapore (Under $750,000)

Pro How Much Do Industrial Areas Really Impact Condo Prices? A Case Study Of Bishan And Yishun

Pro Can A New Integrated Project Raise The Value Of Your Condo? The Surprising Results Near Sengkang Grand Residences
