Now That GE2025 Is Over, Let’s Talk About The Housing Proposals That Didn’t Get Enough Scrutiny

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.
Our alternative housing proposals are missing a few steps.
I’m talking about the election, and the proposals from different parties that are going around. Some of these are quite surprising to me. Case in point: the proposal to make every housing estate eligible for the Selective En Bloc Redevelopment Scheme (SERS).
SERS is a very expensive programme, which involves not only buying back the flat, but also providing a replacement unit with a fresh lease; and this doesn’t count other forms of support and compensation. To stretch something intended for just five per cent of estates to 100 per cent would be enormous (not to mention kick resale prices into overdrive, since lease decay would become virtually meaningless).
There are also a lot of policies that involve excluding land costs. I am aware of the argument that, because HDB really just pays SLA for the land, it might be fair to exclude this cost for buyers. (Take from one pocket, put into the other, as the coffee shop uncles complain.)
One of these proposals suggests that the land costs be paid only when the owner chooses to sell it on the secondary market. But that’s still a hit to government coffers, as the money for the land comes much later (if at all), and in the meantime, we’re denied funds that could be going toward education, healthcare, upgrading older estates, etc.
I’m not deriding the alternative ideas, mind you; I even like some of them in concept. What nags me is the incomplete nature of the proposals. Some are built on the assumption that we have a nigh-infinite mountain of wealth, which will fund all of these programmes with no trade-offs.
But our coffers, sizeable though they are, are meant to support essentials like healthcare, education, and infrastructure, not just subsidise nicer flats for everyone. Healthcare in our rapidly ageing society is a valid one (unlike our obsession with covered walkways – enough already.) We also need to consider other issues, such as with a low birth rate, a time will come when many flats will be vacant and passed down; so, rampant overbuilding leads to problems later.
So while these new ideas on housing are great, I do wish they came with instructions attached so to speak – detailed explanations of not just the policy, but on how we’ll pay for them, how we can roll them out, and what we’re giving up in exchange for it (because it’s never free.)
I still think we need to talk about the normalisation of dual-income families, in light of all this
More from Stacked
URA Is Asking Questions About Property Agent Commissions; Here’s How It Could Affect You
Property developers have been grumbling of late, and we’re not talking about potential new cooling measures. The gripe has been…

Some of you may have heard this rant before, so I’ll keep it short. I think we really need to look at single-wage-to-home-costs. We’ve transitioned from a time when sole breadwinners could afford a flat with relative ease to a situation where dual-income is almost expected. The majority of homeowners I talk to now tell me that, if they or their spouse were to stop working, they’d need to downgrade.
If we’re going to talk about affordable housing, we can start by looking more deeply into this. If our wages have “kept up” with home prices solely because we normalised dual-income families, the affordability may be a little less than the numbers suggest.
So, as a parting thought on this: do I believe housing is affordable in Singapore? For the most part, yes. Do I believe housing is becoming less affordable? Also yes.
The two beliefs are not mutually exclusive.
Meanwhile in other property news…
- 2025 is rough, and housing options have narrowed a bit – but if you’re looking at your first home or getting worried about the cost, calm down. Here are some reasons it’s not as bad as it seems.
- Buying six to 12 months earlier can sometimes translate to around a 150 per cent difference in gains. That’s from actual data found in a mega-development (Treasure at Tampines), so check out the case study.
- I love walk-ups too, but don’t ignore the shops downstairs. They can shape future demand – or sometimes just add way too much noise.
- Do one-bedder condos really perform better in prime areas, as the old saying suggests? We took a deep dive into eight years’ worth of transactions, to find the answer.
Weekly Sales Roundup (21 April – 27 April)
Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
21 ANDERSON | $21,593,170 | 4489 | $4,811 | FH |
PINETREE HILL | $3,987,000 | 1464 | $2,724 | 99 yrs (2022) |
ARDOR RESIDENCE | $3,809,520 | 1518 | $2,510 | FH |
THE ORIE | $3,758,000 | 1453 | $2,586 | 99 yrs (2024) |
BLOSSOMS BY THE PARK | $3,730,000 | 1507 | $2,475 | 99 yrs (2022) |
Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ONE MARINA GARDENS | $1,251,638 | 431 | $2,907 | 99 years |
LUMINA GRAND | $1,422,000 | 936 | $1,518 | 99 yrs (2022) |
NOVO PLACE | $1,484,000 | 883 | $1,681 | 99 years |
BLOOMSBURY RESIDENCES | $1,552,000 | 646 | $2,403 | 99 years |
LENTOR CENTRAL RESIDENCES | $1,693,000 | 678 | $2,497 | 99 yrs (2023) |
Top 5 Most Expensive Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
FOUR SEASONS PARK | $9,800,000 | 2874 | $3,410 | FH |
THE WHARF RESIDENCE | $8,500,000 | 4446 | $1,912 | 999 yrs (1841) |
CUSCADEN RESERVE | $6,890,000 | 2099 | $3,283 | 99 yrs (2018) |
BEAVERTON COURT | $5,950,000 | 3122 | $1,906 | FH |
THE GRANGE | $5,000,000 | 1765 | $2,832 | FH |
Top 5 Cheapest Resale
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
ISUITES @ MARSHALL | $712,800 | 355 | $2,007 | FH |
SMART SUITES | $716,888 | 452 | $1,586 | FH |
CENTRAL IMPERIAL | $718,000 | 549 | $1,308 | FH |
SOL ACRES | $735,000 | 495 | $1,484 | 99 yrs (2014) |
JOOL SUITES | $750,000 | 409 | $1,834 | FH |
Top 5 Biggest Winners
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
21 ANDERSON | $21,593,170 | 4489 | $4,811 | $19,041,170 | 18 Years |
BOTANIC GARDENS VIEW | $3,140,000 | 1259 | $2,493 | $2,160,000 | 26 Years |
ONE AMBER | $3,320,000 | 1453 | $2,285 | $2,115,930 | 16 Years |
WINDY HEIGHTS | $3,158,000 | 2476 | $1,276 | $1,988,000 | 28 Years |
THE WATERINA | $2,700,000 | 1335 | $2,023 | $1,960,000 | 20 Years |
Top 5 Biggest Losers
PROJECT NAME | PRICE S$ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
UP@ROBERTSON QUAY | $985,000 | 463 | $2,128 | -$298,000 | 12 Years |
ONE SHENTON | $2,880,000 | 1593 | $1,808 | -$146,700 | 11 Years |
1919 | $1,190,000 | 635 | $1,874 | -$125,000 | 7 Years |
THE SAIL @ MARINA BAY | $1,708,000 | 883 | $1,935 | -$58,000 | 18 Years |
PINETREE HILL | $3,987,000 | 1464 | $2,724 | $0 | 0 Years |
Transaction Breakdown

Ryan J
A seasoned content strategist with over 17 years in the real estate and financial journalism sectors, Ryan has built a reputation for transforming complex industry jargon into accessible knowledge. With a track record of writing and editing for leading financial platforms and publications, Ryan's expertise has been recognised across various media outlets. His role as a former content editor for 99.co and a co-host for CNA 938's Open House programme underscores his commitment to providing valuable insights into the property market.Read next from Editor's Pick

New Launch Condo Reviews Penrith Condo Review: Full-Facility Condo For Just 462 Units Near The MRT

New Launch Condo Analysis This New 706-Unit Integrated Condo at River Valley Starts From $1.298M – And the Price Raises a Big Question for Buyers

Property Investment Insights Faber Residence Pricing Review: How It Compares To Nearby Resale And New Launches

Singapore Property News The Real Reason Homes Keep Getting Snapped Up in Singapore
Latest Posts

Overseas Property Investing Why Renewed Interest In Johor Will Not Help All Investors In The Iskandar Region

On The Market 5 Cheapest 5-Room HDB Flats You Can Buy Right Now From $535k

Property Market Commentary The Best Condo Rental Yields Near International Schools In Singapore Isn’t Where You’d Expect

On The Market The Cheapest 3-Bedroom Condos in Singapore You Can Buy Right Now Under $1.2M

New Launch Condo Analysis Skye At Holland Pricing Review: How It Compares To Nearby Resale And New Launches

On The Market Three Rare Bungalows With Unique Design Hit The Market For $13.98m – Each With Over 9,300 Sq Ft Of Space

Pro Are Older One- and Two-Bedders in District 10 Holding Up Against the New Launches? We Break It Down

Property Market Commentary Are Singapore’s Oldest HDB Flats Finally Losing Value? A 2025 Price Update

Property Trends The Room That Changed the Most in Singapore Homes: What Happened to Our Kitchens?

On The Market A Rare 1930s Art Deco Home In Alexandra With 33,000 Sq Ft of Land Is Up For Rent

On The Market The Cheapest 4-Room HDB Flats Still Available Right Now – From $410,000

Pro Old vs New Family-Sized Condos in District 9: A Data-Driven Analysis of Value in 2025

Property Market Commentary 5 Ways Singapore’s Condo Layouts Have Changed Over The Years (And What We No Longer Value)

On The Market 5 Biggest Condos In Singapore You Can Buy Right Now For Less Than $1.8M

Pro Are Older One- and Two-Bedders in District 9 Holding Up Against the New Launches? We Break It Down
