Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Judge A Property Purely On It’s “HIGH” PSF

Get The Property Insights Serious Buyers Read First: Join 50,000+ readers who rely on our weekly breakdowns of Singapore’s property market.

In May 2018 last year, a research report by DBS forecasts new private homes to cost between $2,300 to $2,900 per square foot (PSF) on average by 2030.
Shocked?
Well, judging by the number of shares on that post (5766 at the time of writing), you aren’t the only one to be flabbergasted by the news.
To be fair, it does seem like it is a high number.
Particularly when you find out that the current average in Singapore is $1,500 PSF.
This leads us to the main point of this article.
Why the fixation on the PSF of a property?
Many people that we’ve met seem to place an overemphasis on the PSF of a property, so much so that it blinds them from making an astute purchase.
“$2,100 PSF for Tiong Bahru! Who is crazy enough to pay that!“
And… the conversation is over.
Because there is this mental barrier in their head that a condo in Tiong Bahru should not cost more than $2,000 PSF, they shut it off and cannot bring themselves to cross that threshold.
So what is more important than looking at the PSF of a property?
There are two things that I would like to highlight to you today.
The first is the quantum, and the second is the layout.
Let me show you what I mean with an example:
Say you are looking for a 2 bedroom property in the Newton area.
You come across a 2 bedder at Park Infinia at Wee Nam (TOP 2008).
The last transacted price was at $2,103 PSF at a size of 850 square feet.
You might be thinking, this is not bad at all!
For a District 11 Newton/Novena apartment, the PSF seems about right for a premium district.
850 square feet of space also does appear to be quite generous for a 2 bedroom in this day and age.
Then on the same day itself, you come across an advertisement on Facebook for the Pullman Residences (because Facebook is creepy like that).
“Pullman Residences, premium development starting from $2,800 PSF!“
Immediately, you see the high PSF and balk at it.
When actually the real thing you should be looking at is the final quantum and layout of it.
So simply put:

Now you might be saying, “But the Pullman Residences is so much smaller!“
Yes, but you will have to take into consideration here that the Pullman Residences is a new launch.
Which, once it is launched, will be 15 years its senior!
And, here is the kicker.

Look at all the inefficient spaces of the older development.
Bay windows everywhere and big bomb shelter.
Now, look at the newer development.

So unless you are a big bay window fanatic, the usable space is almost negligible (in our humble opinion).
Let us take a look at another example.

Here is Sky Everton at $2,539 PSF.

Just look at Spottiswoode Residences as a comparison.
Bigger area, low PSF.

But just look at the amount of outdoor space and planters.
Again, unless you are a big fan of these spaces, which would you say is the more efficient layout?
Plus, the quantum here is even lower!
At the end of the day, these comparisons might not work on every single property.
But, we hope that these examples give you a better understanding of why you should never just look, or judge a property by its PSF first.
To all those readers out there that have been taken aback at how the PSF has risen, there is a reason why there are transactions still going on today.
More buyers are becoming cognizant of this; that an efficient space layout and quantum is more important than the number on the paper.
Ultimately, the quantum is the main factor of whether or not you can afford to buy the property, and as such IS the final determinant in which you should base your decision on.
If you want more examples like this, feel free to reach out to us at hello@stackedhomes.com!
Stanley
Stanley loves crunching numbers in excel and analysing them. Naturally, he helps Stacked Homes generate articles based on his analysis as much as he can. When he's not using Excel, he enjoys watching movies and eating chocolates.Read next from Property Advice

Property Advice The New Condos In Singapore With The Most Efficient Layouts In 2025 Revealed – And What To Look Out For

Property Advice The Hidden Costs of Hiring a “Cheaper” Agent In Singapore

Property Advice The Math Behind Why 30–35 Is The Sweet Spot To Upgrade From HDB To Condo

Property Advice The Ideal Size for Each Room of Your Condo to Actually Feel Liveable Revealed
Latest Posts

Singapore Property News How A Waterfront Development With 4,000 Homes Is Going To Reshape Singapore’s Property Market

On The Market 5 Rare HDB Flats Above 1,700 Sq Ft You Can Buy Right Now – From $850K

Pro District 15 Resale vs New Launch Condos – Analysing Price Gaps for Larger Family Units

Property Investment Insights Are Singapore’s Suburban Condos Still Affordable? The Surprising Truth

On The Market Rare 16,000 Sq ft Freehold Plot In D15 Hits The Market For $39M

Editor's Pick I Transformed My Two-Bedroom Unit Into A Dual-Key Layout – Here’s Why I Would Not Do It Again

Pro New Launch vs Resale One and Two Bedders in D15: Here’s Where The Price Gaps Are The Biggest

Property Market Commentary Why More Families Are Choosing Two-Bedders Over Bigger Properties in 2025

Property Market Commentary What The URA Master Plan Reveals About Marina Bay’s Future (And How It Could Impact Property Values)

Editor's Pick We Toured An ‘Exclusive’ Freehold Landed Enclave In Singapore That Feels Close To Nature – And Even Has A Canal Running Through It

Singapore Property News Where Condo Prices Rose Fastest (and Slowest) in Singapore’s Outside Central Regions

Editor's Pick I Left Singapore for New York and Ended Up Launching a $450M Manhattan Project. Here’s What I Learned About Buying Property Here

On The Market 5 Cheapest Freehold 3-Bedroom Condo Units In Singapore You Can Buy This Week – Including Quiet Spot in Floraville

Pro Analysing 10 Years of District 12 Boutique Condo Transactions: Insights Into What Drives Profitability

Editor's Pick Rare Detached Freehold Home On Singapore’s ‘Millionaire’s Row’ Up For Sale At $14m
